Procedural Law Regulation: The Problem of Efficiency
https://doi.org/10.17803/1994-1471.2023.156.11.029-038
Abstract
The paper provides for some meanings of such an important scientific direction as the improvement of procedural and legal regulation. The authors describe this regulation as a specific way of legal regulation of public relations in general. The essence of procedural and legal regulation involves the activity of authorized entities who, with the help of procedural and legal means, provide regulation and protection in the process of ordering public relations. In the most general form, efficiency is understood as the balance between the actual result obtained and the planned goal, the achievement of which is conditioned by the solution of the corresponding tasks. In turn, the procedural and legal regulation is mediated by the relevant criteria and conditions enumerated in the paper. The authors name the improvement of procedural legislation among such conditions, since now procedural legislation has collisions, gaps, imbalances, etc. Perfect legislation means effective and high-quality legislation, which requires appropriate monitoring, unification of the tasks of judicial proceedings, intersectoral convergence, etc. The paper highlights the importance of procedural principles. The authors propose to consolidate in legislation such of them as justice, equality of everyone before the law and the court, as well as the principle of establishing objective truth. The authors propose to develop and adopt at the level of the federal constitutional law the Fundamentals of Procedural Legislation and Legislation on Judicial Proceedings in the Russian Federation and describe their structural construction.
About the Authors
V. P. BelyaevRussian Federation
Valeriy P. Belyaev - Dr. Sci. (Law), Professor, Professor, Department of Theory and History
of the State and Law
94, 50 let Oktyabrya St, Kursk 305040
G. S. Belyaeva
Russian Federation
Galina S. Belyaeva - Dr. Sci. (Law), Professor, Head of the Department of Administrative Law and Procedure
References
1. Azarov V. A. Spravedlivost kak pervoosnova ravenstva vsekh pered zakonom i sudom v ugolovnom protsesse Rossii // Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Pravo. — 2022. — № 43. — S. 5–20.
2. Alekseev S. S. Mekhanizm pravovogo regulirovaniya v sotsialisticheskom gosudarstve. — M.: Yurid. lit., 1966. — 187 s.
3. Aminov D. I. Sovremennoe znachenie pravovoy kategorii «obektivnaya istina» v sisteme sovremennogo sudoproizvodstva // Vestnik ekonomicheskoy bezopasnosti. — 2021. — № 3. — S. 103–105.
4. Bogatkina R. Sh. Problemy realizatsii i perspektivy razvitiya kategorii «spravedlivost» v ugolovnom sudoproizvodstve // Vestnik Kazanskogo yuridicheskogo instituta MVD Rossii. — 2020. — № 3 (4). — S. 338– 342.
5. Dronova Yu. A., Tumanova L. V. Replika o spravedlivosti kak pravovoy kategorii // Vestnik Tverskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. — 2020. — № 1. — S. 113–122.
6. Kashanin A. V., Tretyakov S. V. Deystvie zakona: teoreticheskie usloviya analiza // Problemnyy analiz i gosudarstvenno-upravlencheskoe proektirovanie. — 2012. — № 4. — S. 79–95.
7. Kirdyashova E. V. Sovershenstvovanie zakonodatelstva i razvitie prava // Vestnik Universiteta imeni O.E. Kutafina (MGYuA). — 2018. — № 4. — S. 118–124.
8. Komarova T. A. Razumnost, spravedlivost i verkhovenstvo prava kak osnovnye nachala grazhdanskogo sudoproizvodstva: avtoref. dis. … kand. yurid. nauk. — Saratov, 2019. — 22 s.
9. Lapaeva V. V. Issledovanie effektivnosti deystviya zakonodatelstva po rezultatam pravovogo monitoringa // Nauka. Innovatsii. Obrazovanie. — 2008. — № 1. — S. 269–291.
10. Martyshin O. V. Problema tsennostey v teorii gosudarstva i prava // Gosudarstvo i pravo. — 2004. — № 10. — S. 5–14.
11. Muradyan E. M. Istina kak problema sudebnogo prava. — M.: Bylina, 2002. — 287 s.
12. Osipov M. Yu. Effektivnost pravovogo regulirovaniya: ponyatie, vidy, metodika otsenivaniya // Sovremennoe pravo. — 2010. — № 5. — S. 7–10.
13. Polenina S. V. Kachestvo zakona i sovershenstvovanie pravotvorchestva // Sovetskoe gosudarstvo i pravo. — 1987. — № 7. — S. 12–19.
14. Problemy razvitiya protsessualnogo prava Rossii / pod red. V. M. Zhuykova; In t zakonodatelstva i sravnitelnogo pravovedeniya pri Pravitelstve Rossiyskoy Federatsii. — M.: Norma: Infra M, 2016. — 223 s.
15. Ravenstvo v ugolovnom protsesse Rossii / A. M. Baranov, S. A. Kuzora, Yu. G. Ovchinnikov, I. A. Cherdantseva. — M.: Yurlitinform, 2013. — 168 s.
16. Reshetnikova I. V. Evolyutsiya grazhdanskogo sudoproizvodstva v Rossii // Rossiyskaya yustitsiya. — 2013. — № 1. — S. 36–39.
17. Tikhomirov Yu. A. Effektivnost zakona: ot tseli k rezultatu // Zhurnal rossiyskogo prava. — 2009. — № 4. — S. 3–9.
18. Tumanov D. A. Nuzhen li sovremennomu sudoproizvodstvu printsip obektivnoy istiny // Vestnik Universiteta imeni O.E. Kutafina (MGYuA). — 2021. — № 12. — S. 28–40.
Review
For citations:
Belyaev V.P., Belyaeva G.S. Procedural Law Regulation: The Problem of Efficiency. Actual Problems of Russian Law. 2023;18(11):29-38. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17803/1994-1471.2023.156.11.029-038