Criminal Procedural Status of the Investigation Team
https://doi.org/10.17803/1994-1471.2023.157.12.137-150
- Р Р‡.МессенРТвЂВВВВВВВВжер
- РћРТвЂВВВВВВВВнокласснРСвЂВВВВВВВВРєРСвЂВВВВВВВВ
- LiveJournal
- Telegram
- ВКонтакте
- РЎРєРѕРїРСвЂВВВВВВВВровать ссылку
Full Text:
Abstract
The paper is devoted to the criminal procedural nature of the investigation team. Based on the characteristics inherent in the investigation team, it is differentiated from other forms of collective implementation of the preliminary investigation: crime scene investigation team (duty, target, specialized, joint) and forensic teams. Particular attention is given to the grounds for creation, the parties involved in the investigation team, and the requirements for familiarizing participants in criminal proceedings with this team. The idea is substantiated that the criminal procedural law should establish norms regulating the status of the head of the investigation team, issues of their interaction with the head of the investigative body, with investigators — members of the investigation team. It is noted that the current legal provisions limit the procedural independence of the investigator as a member of the group in question compared to the individual form of preliminary investigation. The study of the practice of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation, as well as appellate and cassation courts of general jurisdiction, made it possible to formulate some proposals for improving the legislative regulation of the functioning of the investigative team.
Keywords
About the Author
A. G. KulevRussian Federation
Aleksandr G. Kulev, Cand. Sci. (Law), Associate Professor, Associate Professor, Department of Criminal Procedure and Criminology
ul. Sovetskaya, d. 14, Yaroslavl, Russia, 150003
References
1. Gordeev A. Yu., Khoryakov S. N. Protsessualnye osobennosti proizvodstva predvaritelnogo sledstviya sledstvennoy gruppoy // Nauka. Teoriya. Praktika. - 2020. - № 3. - S. 19-27.
2. Zafesov V. G. Problemy rassledovaniya mnogoepizodnykh ugolovnykh del gruppovym metodom: protsessualnye i takticheskie aspekty: avtoref. dis. … kand. yurid. nauk. - Krasnodar, 2004. - 25 s.
3. Zakharova O. V. Kollektivnye formy rassledovaniya: ot prinyatiya resheniya do rekomendatsiy // Rossiyskiy sledovatel. - 2011. - № 9. - S. 3-7.
4. Zotov A. Yu. Dolzhnostnye litsa organov predvaritelnogo sledstviya kak subekty ugolovno-protsessualnoy deyatelnosti. - M., 2021. - 184 s.
5. Kashchak A. V. Oznakomlenie uchastnikov ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva s sostavom sledstvennoy gruppy // Vestnik Vostochno-Sibirskogo instituta MVD Rossii. - 2022. - № 3 (102). - S. 145-154.
6. Kuchkina V. G. Sravnitelnyy analiz sledstvennykh i sledstvenno-operativnykh grupp // Rossiyskiy sledovatel. - 2011. - № 24. - S. 2-5.
7. Lubyagin M. S. Problemy realizatsii prava podozrevaemogo, obvinyaemogo na oznakomlenie s sostavom sledstvenno-operativnoy gruppy kak narushenie protsessualnogo prava na zashchitu v ugolovnom sudoproizvodstve // Sibirskie ugolovno-protsessualnye i kriminalisticheskie chteniya. - 2022. - № 2. - S. 68-78.
8. Mozhaeva I. P. O pravovom obespechenii deyatelnosti sledstvenno-operativnykh grupp // Rossiyskiy sledovatel. - 2011. - № 16. - S. 33-35.
9. Popov A. I. Sledstvennaya gruppa kak odna iz form kollektivnogo metoda rassledovaniya prestupleniy: sovremennoe sostoyanie i perspektivy razvitiya // Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta MVD Rossii. - 2013. - № 3. - S. 119-124.
10. Savenko G. M. Sledstvennye gruppy v ugolovnom protsesse: avtoref. dis. … kand. yurid. nauk. - M., 2007. - 27 s.
11. Smirnova I. S. Dosudebnoe proizvodstvo po slozhnomu ugolovnomu delu: avtoref. dis. … kand. yurid. nauk. - Chelyabinsk, 2013. - 24 s.
12. Tarasov A. A. «Brigadnoe rassledovanie» v kontekste obshchikh problem sledstvennogo apparata sovremennoy Rossii // Pravovoe gosudarstvo: teoriya i praktika. - 2019. - № 1 (55). - S. 135-139.
13. Tarasov A. A. Sledstvennaya gruppa po novomu UPK Rossii // Materialy mezhdunarodnoy nauchnoprakticheskoy konferentsii, posvyashchennoy prinyatiyu novogo Ugolovno-protsessualnogo kodeksa Rossiyskoy Federatsii. - M., 2002. - S. 149-152.
14. Terekhov A. Yu., Latypov V. S., Gimazetdinova I. N. Osushchestvlenie dosudebnogo proizvodstva v usloviyakh slozhnosti i bolshogo obema ugolovnogo dela. - M., 2022. - 168 s.
15. Ulimaev R. Yu. Sledstvenno-operativnye gruppy: pravovoy status, organizatsiya i deyatelnost: avtoref. dis. … kand. yurid. nauk. - M., 2001. - 24 s.
16. Khamgokov M. M. Proizvodstvo predvaritelnogo sledstviya sledstvennoy gruppoy: avtoref. dis. … kand. yurid. nauk. - Krasnodar, 2009. - 27 s.
17. Tsvetkov Yu. A. «Osobo vazhnye dela»: ugolovno-protsessualnyy smysl // Ugolovnoe sudoproizvodstvo. - 2022. - № 3. - S. 18-27.
18. Tsokolov I. A. Protsessualnye i kriminalisticheskie osobennosti rassledovaniya prestupleniy sledstvennoy i sledstvenno-operativnoy gruppoy: avtoref. dis. … kand. yurid. nauk. - M., 2001. - 30 s.
19. Shamsutdinov M. M. Proizvodstvo predvaritelnogo sledstviya sledstvennoy gruppoy (protsessualnye, upravlencheskie i taktiko-psikhologicheskie aspekty): avtoref. dis. … kand. yurid. nauk. - Izhevsk, 2005. - 27 s.
Review
For citations:
Kulev A.G. Criminal Procedural Status of the Investigation Team. Actual Problems of Russian Law. 2023;18(12):137-150. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17803/1994-1471.2023.157.12.137-150
ISSN 2782-1862 (Online)