Genesis of the Institution of Accusation

The issues of accusation have always attracted the attention of both law enforcement officials and scientists. In the modern Russian criminal procedural legislation, the accusation has undergone changes, but its essence and significance do not lose relevance and still attract the attention of scientists and practitioners. This is due to the development of the adversarial principle, under which the function of the prosecution must be separated from the function of the defense. The use of information technology should guarantee the collection of not only incriminating, but also exculpatory evidence, based on the purpose of criminal proceedings. In this regard, questions are being considered about the possible development of the institution of accusation in the conditions of digitalization. Of particular interest is the analysis of legislation taking into account its development in retrospect. Studying the positive legislative experience of some foreign countries is also of some interest, since this experience can be used to improve Russian legislation.

1. Antonovich E. K. Ispolzovanie v dokazyvanii rezultatov proslushivaniya telefonnykh peregovorov v usloviyakh razvitiya informatsionnykh tekhnologiy (sravnitelno-pravovoy analiz zakonodatelstva Rossiyskoy Federatsii i zakonodatelstva nekotorykh inostrannykh gosudarstv) // Lex russica. — 2019. — № 7 (152). — S. 160–171.

2. Vilkova T. Yu. Obyazatelnoe audio- i videoprotokolirovanie sudebnogo zasedaniya v ugolovnom sudoproizvodstve v Rossii i za rubezhom: sravnitelno-pravovoy analiz // Evolyutsiya gosudarstva i prava: problemy i perspektivy: sbornik nauchnykh trudov Mezhdunarodnoy nauchnoy konferentsii, posvyashchennoy 55-letiyu YuZGU (28–29 marta 2019 goda) / redkol.: A. A. Gorokhov (otv. red.); Yugo-Zap. gos. un-t. — Kursk, 2019. — S. 181–185.

3. Vilkova T. Yu. Printsip glasnosti ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva: istoriya, sovremennost, perspektivy: monografiya. — M.: Yurayt, 2019. — 286 s. — ISBN 978-5-534-10030-3.

4. Vilkova T. Yu. Realizatsiya printsipa yazyka ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva na stadiyakh vozbuzhdeniya ugolovnogo dela i predvaritelnogo rassledovaniya v usloviyakh razvitiya tsifrovykh tekhnologiy // Voprosy rossiyskogo i mezhdunarodnogo prava. — 2019. — T. 9. — № 3A. — S. 277–284.

5. Vilkova T. Yu., Maslennikova L. N. Zakonnost i unifikatsiya v ugolovnom sudoproizvodstve: ot blankov protsessualnykh dokumentov — k elektronnomu ugolovnomu delu // Vestnik Permskogo universiteta. Yuridicheskie nauki. — 2019. — Vyp. 46. — S. 728–751. — DOI: 10.17072/1995-4190-2019-46-728-751.

6. Voronin M. I. Elektronnye dokazatelstva v UPK: byt ili ne byt? // Lex russica. — 2019. — № 7 (152). — S. 74–84.

7. Voskobitova L. A. Obemnoe ponimanie ugolovno-protsessualnogo prava // Ugolovnoe sudoproizvodstvo. — 2019. — № 2. — S. 10–16.

8. Voskobitova L. A. Osnovy ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva i tsifrovizatsiya // Rossiyskaya pravovaya Sistema v usloviyakh chetvertoy promyshlennoy revolyutsii. XVI Mezhdunarodnaya nauchno-prakticheskaya konferentsiya (Kutafinskie chteniya): materialy konferentsii: v 3 ch. — Ch. 3. — M.: RG-Press, 2019. — S. 75–86.

9. Voskobitova L. A. Ugolovnoe sudoproizvodstvo i tsifrovye tekhnologii: problemy sovmestimosti // Lex russica. — 2019. — № 5 (150). — S. 91–104.

10. Gavrilov B. Ya. Sovershenstvovanie dosudebnogo proizvodstva v svete realizatsii osnovnykh polozheniy UPK RF // Ugolovnyy protsess. — 2005. — № 1. — S. 18–25.

11. Gavrilov B. Ya., Kolbeeva M. Yu. Institut predyavleniya obvineniya: aktualnye problemy ego sovershenstvovaniya // Rossiyskiy sledovatel. — 2009. — № 15. — S. 35–37.

12. Kalnitskiy V. V. Privlechenie v kachestve obvinyaemogo: sovremennaya kharakteristika i predposylki reformirovaniya // Ugolovnoe sudoproizvodstvo. — 2007. — № 3. — S. 23–29.

13. Orlova A. A. Realizatsiya naznacheniya ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva pri privlechenii v kachestve obvinyaemogo: nauchno-prakticheskiy kommentariy. — Podgotovlen dlya SPS «KonsultantPlyus», 2008.

14. Poddubrovskiy S. A. Taktika privlecheniya v kachestve obvinyaemogo i predyavleniya obvineniya (protsessualnoe i kriminalisticheskoe issledovanie): dis. … kand. yurid. nauk. — Volgograd, 2008.

15. Ponomarenko S. I. Sovremennye problemy realizatsii protsessualnogo statusa podozrevaemogo: avtoref. dis. … kand. yurid. nauk. — Volgograd, 2005.

16. Strogovich M. S. Kurs sovetskogo ugolovnogo protsessa: v 2 t. — M.: Nauka, 1968.

17. Fedotchenko A. V. Privlechenie litsa v kachestve obvinyaemogo: dis. … kand. yurid. nauk. — M., 2006.