Applying the Experience of International Legal Protection of Belovezhskaya Forest to the Development of the Baikal Region Environmental Activities

The paper is structured by grouping environmental issues common to various World Heritage sites, including Belovezhskaya Forest and Lake Baikal. The paper highlights the problems of defining the boundaries of World Heritage Site (WHS); the WHS management practice; methods used in protection of the Belovezhskaya Forest to ensure the participation of the local population in the conservation of the WHS; issues of management and conservation of biodiversity on the territory of the WHS. In conclusion, the authors formulate proposals aimed at improving the conservation of Lake Baikal World Heritage site. In particular, it is concluded that among the immediate interests of the local population of the central ecological zone of the Baikal natural territory (especially those involved in the organization of the tourism business) is the popularization of the World Heritage protection regime, along with obstruction of the implementation of proposals to reduce the boundaries of the World Heritage site (including through the erroneous differentiation of the concepts «site» and «region» of the World Heritage). The prospects for using legal methods of interaction between public institutions and government authorities are indicated, including making proposals in accordance with the procedure established by law to improve the management of a World Heritage Site, as well as through the creation of advisory councils of local populations and indigenous peoples.

1. Anisimov A. P. Obekty prirodnogo naslediya kak pravovaya kategoriya // Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Pravo. — 2019. — № 31. — S. 43–52.

2. Brinchuk M. M. Spetsialnyy pravovoy rezhim prirodnykh resursov: titul prirody v golovnom akte ekologicheskogo zakonodatelstva // Gosudarstvo i pravo. — 2022. — № 11. — S. 106–113.

3. Buryy A. V., Arnolbik V. M., Bernatskiy D. I., Kravchuk V. G. Razvitie sistemy funktsionalnogo zonirovaniya natsionalnogo parka «Belovezhskaya pushcha» // Belovezhskaya pushcha. Issledovaniya: sbornik nauchnykh statey. — Vyp. 15. — 2017. — S. 6–16.

4. Ditsevich Ya. B., Kolobov R. Yu. Potentsial Konventsii ob okhrane vsemirnogo kulturnogo i prirodnogo naslediya dlya resheniya prirodookhrannykh zadach na obekte vsemirnogo naslediya «Ozero Baykal» // Mezhdunarodnoe pravo. — 2020. — № 4. — S. 11–24.

5. Kolobov R. Yu. Problemy opredeleniya granits obekta vsemirnogo naslediya «Ozero Baykal» // Sibirskiy yuridicheskiy vestnik. — 2019. — № 2 (85). — S. 113–119.

6. Kolobov R. Yu. Rol Konventsii ob okhrane vsemirnogo kulturnogo i prirodnogo naslediya v okhrane ozera Baykal // Voprosy rossiyskogo i mezhdunarodnogo prava. — 2020. — T. 10. — № 1 2. — S. 482–496.

7. Kolobov R. Yu., Ditsevich Ya. B. O neobkhodimosti zakrepleniya osnovnykh mezhdunarodno-pravovykh prirodookhrannykh rezhimov v rossiyskom zakonodatelstve // Problemy preduprezhdeniya narusheniy ekologicheskogo zakonodatelstva: sbornik statey materialov IX ezhegodnogo nauchno-prakticheskogo kruglogo stola. — Irkutsk: Irkutskiy yuridicheskiy institut (filial) Universiteta prokuratury Rossiyskoy Federatsii, 2022. — S. 54–59.

8. Chmyga O. V. Edinolichnye organy territorialnogo obshchestvennogo samoupravleniya Belarusi: pravovoy status i perspektivy sovershenstvovaniya pravovogo regulirovaniya // Problemy ukrepleniya zakonnosti i pravoporyadka: nauka, praktika, tendentsii: sbornik nauchnykh trudov / GU «Nauchno-prakticheskiy tsentr problem ukrepleniya zakonnosti i pravoporyadka Generalnoy prokuratury Respubliki Belarus»; redkol.: V. V. Marchuk (gl. red.) [i dr.]. — Minsk: Izd. tsentr BGU, 2022. — Vyp. 15. — S. 117–123.

9. Are bilateral conservation policies for the Białowieża forest unattainable? Analysis of stated preferences of Polish and Belarusian public / S. Valasiuk, M. Czajkowski, M. Giergiczny [et al.] // Journal of Forest Economics. — 2017. — Vol. 27. — P. 70–79.

10. Blicharska M., Herzele v. A. What a forest? Whose forest? Struggles over concepts and meanings in the debate about the conservation of the Białowieża Forest in Poland // Forest Policy and Economics. — 2015. — Vol. 57. — P. 25.

11. Daily, Eco-environmental impacts of dams in the Yangtze River Basin, China / Boyan Li, Nengcheng Chen, Wei Wang [et al.] // Science of the Total Environment. — 2021. — Vol. 774. — 145743. — ISSN 0048-9697.

12. Is the impact of loggings in the last primeval lowland forest in Europe underestimated? The conservation issues of Bialowieza Forest / G. Mikusinski, J. B. Bubnicki, M. Churski [et al.] // Biological Conservation. — 2018. — Vol. 227. — P. 266–274.

13. Mikusinski G., Niedzialkowski K. Percieved importance of ecosystem services in the Bialowieza Forest for local communities — Does proximity matter? // Land Use Policy. — 2020. — Vol. 97. — 104667.

14. Niedziałkowski K., Blicharska M., Mikusiński G., Jędrzejewska B. Why is it difficult to enlarge a protected area? Ecosystem services perspective on the conflict around the extension of the Białowieża National Park in Poland // Land Use Policy. — 2014. — Vol. 38. — P. 314–329.

15. Population ecology and conservation of endangered megafauna: the case of European bison in Białowieża Primeval Forest, Poland / A. Mysterud, K. A. Bartoń, B. Jędrzejewska [et al.] // Animal Conservation. — 2006. — Vol. 10. — Iss. 1. — P. 78.