The Priority Right to Upbringing: History and Modernity

The relevance of the study of the preferential right to upbringing using a comparative historical and legal method (by referring to the Soviet legal experience) can be explained by the fact that it was during the Soviet period that the emphasis was placed on the priority right to upbringing (between the State (society) and parents; between parents), which still takes place in post-Soviet family legislation. The paper analyzes the reasons for the change in the priority subjects of child upbringing in historical retrospect. The problem is that in the post-Soviet period, some law enforcement agencies, undern Article 6 of the Declaration on the Rights of the Child of 1959, when considering cases determining the place of residence of a child, began to recognize the priority right to upbringing for the mother, while other law enforcement agencies are guided by the principle of equality of rights of both parents, fixed in the Family Code of the Russian Federation. The author highlights different aspects of this problem and suggests ways to solve them.

1. Vakhromeeva O. B. Otnosheniya mezhdu roditelyami i detmi: iz istorii semeynogo prava dorevolyutsionnoy Rossii // Trudy istoricheskogo fakulteta Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta. — 2014. — № 19. — S. 58–72.

2. Galichenko M. A. Istoriya razvitiya zakonodatelstva o lishenii roditelskikh prav // Mezhdunarodnyy zhurnal gumanitarnykh i estestvennykh nauk. — 2020. — № 12 3. — S. 81–83.

3. Danilenkov A. V. Vozrastnoy tsenz rebenka kak odin iz sposobov nepravomernogo ogranicheniya prav ottsov v RF // Semeynoe i zhilishchnoe pravo. — 2013. — № 2. — S. 10–15.

4. Zagorovskiy A. I. Kurs semeynogo prava. — Odessa: Tipografiya Aktsionernogo Yuzhno-Russkogo obshchestva pechatnogo dela, 1909. — 574 s.

5. Ilyukhina V. A. Evolyutsiya printsipov semeynogo prava v RSFSR // Istoriko-pravovye problemy: Novyy rakurs. — 2022. — № 2. — S. 112–118.

6. Karaseva A. A. Ideya obshchestvennogo vospitaniya v trudakh N. K. Krupskoy // Vestnik Moskovskogo gosudarstvennogo oblastnogo universiteta. Seriya «Istoriya i politicheskie nauki». — 2019. — № 2. — S. 20–27.

7. Kartashov V. N., Ivanov A. B., Egorov S. A. Istoriya gosudarstva i prava Rossii: v 2 ch. Ch. 1: IX — pervaya polovina XIX veka: uchebnik i praktikum dlya vuzov. — M.: Yurayt, 2020. — 309 s.

8. Narodnaya entsiklopediya nauchnykh i prikladnykh znaniy. T. 11: Obshchestvenno-yuridicheskiy, 2 y polutom. — M.: Tipografiya T-va I. D. Sytina, 1912. — 404 s.

9. Perova M. A. Vlast o nesovershennoletnikh grazhdanakh: detstvo v semeynoy politike sovetskoy Rossii 1917–1930 kh gg. // Vestnik YuUrGU. Seriya «Sotsialno-gumanitarnye nauki». — 2016. — T. 16. — № 4. — S. 50–57.

10. Polyanskiy P. L. Kodeks zakonov o brake, seme i opeke RSFSR 1926 goda. Istoriya i kharakteristika. Tekst. Postateynye materialy: monografiya. — M.: Norma: Infra M, 2022. — 240 s.

11. Ryasentsev V. A. Semeynoe pravo: uchebnik. — M.: Yuridicheskaya literatura, 1967. — 224 s.

12. Ryasentsev V. A. Semeynoe pravo: uchebnik. — M.: Yuridicheskaya literatura, 1971. — 296 s.

13. Smykalin A. S. Kanonicheskoe pravo (na primere Russkoy pravoslavnoy tserkvi XI–XXI vv.): ucheb. posobie. — M.: Prospekt, 2016. — 400 s.

14. Tarusina N. N. Odinokoe materinstvo kak sotsialno-pravovoe yavlenie // Zhurnal rossiyskogo prava. — 2022. — T. 26. — № 7. — S. 68–84.

15. Khazova O. A. Printsip 6 Deklaratsii OON prav rebenka 1959 goda v kontekste Konventsii o grazhdansko-pravovykh aspektakh mezhdunarodnogo pokhishcheniya detey 1980 goda // Trudy Instituta gosudarstva i prava RAN. — 2017. — T. 12. — № 6. — S. 202–220