Civil Law Analysis of the Category «Public Legal Entity»: A Case Study of such Legal Entities as Public Authorities

The paper analyzes the possibility of applying the categories «public legal entity» or «legal entity of public law» in civil law. The application of this category to legal entities — public authorities — can be explained by the problem of dualism of their legal status. This dualism is manifested in the fact that, participating in civil legal relations as independent entities, legal entities-public authorities do not cease to be part of the public authority mechanism, which affects the independence of their volition and expression of will, calls into question the existence of their independent interest, different from the interest of the entire public legal entity. Under certain circumstances, legal entities-public authorities may participate in civil law relations on behalf of and in the interests of the entire public legal entity. This complicates the differentiation of such forms in practice and requires its resolution in the science of civil law. As the type-forming features of public legal entities, the author highlights their inherent connection with the public legal entity that created them and the specifics of the legal regime of their property regulation. Applying an extensive set of methods, including comparative legal and formal legal methods and from the standpoint of a systematic scientific approach, the author comes to the conclusion that it is necessary to exclude the possibility of granting public authorities the legal status of legal entities and defining the public legal entities themselves — the Russian Federation, its constituent entities and municipalities — as public legal entities instead of the legal status sui generis. The paper provides a valuable description of the risks of such an innovation caused by an incorrect understanding of the essence of a public legal entity.

1. Bazarov V. B. Publichnye yuridicheskie litsa: monografiya / nauch. red. L. V. Kuras. — Irkutsk: Ottisk, 2019. — 160 s.

2. Boldyrev V. A. O «yuridicheskikh litsakh» publichnogo prava // Zhurnal rossiyskogo prava. — 2008. — № 11. — S. 127–134.

3. Bratus S. N. Subekty grazhdanskogo prava. — M.: Gos. izd-vo yurid. lit-ry, 1950. — 368 s.

4. Venediktov A. V. Gosudarstvennaya sotsialisticheskaya sobstvennost. — M.: Izd-vo Akademii nauk SSSR, 1948. — 840 s.

5. Vinnitskiy A. V. O neobkhodimosti zakonodatelnogo zakrepleniya instituta yuridicheskikh lits publichnogo prava // Zhurnal rossiyskogo prava. — 2011. — № 5. — S. 81–90.

6. Ioffe O. S. Izbrannye trudy po grazhdanskomu pravu: Iz istorii tsivilisticheskoy mysli. Grazhdanskoe pravootnoshenie. Kritika teorii «khozyaystvennogo prava». — M.: Statut, 2020. — 782 s.

7. Kozlova N. V. Ponyatie i sushchnost yuridicheskogo litsa. Ocherk istorii i teorii: ucheb. posobie / nauch. red. V. S. Em. — M.: Statut, 2003. — 318 s.

8. Leskova Yu. G. K voprosu o reformirovanii instituta yuridicheskogo litsa: publichno-pravovoy aspekt // Administrativnoe i munitsipalnoe pravo. — 2012. — № 2.

9. Mikhaylenko O. V. Publichnye yuridicheskie litsa v chastnom prave i chastnye yuridicheskie litsa v publichnom prave // Zhurnal rossiyskogo prava. — 2011. — № 3. — S. 109–117.

10. Pokrovskiy I. A. Osnovnye problemy grazhdanskogo prava. — M.: Statut, 2020. — 351 s.

11. Rasskazov O. L. Yuridicheskie litsa publichnogo prava v rossiyskoy sisteme prava i yuridicheskoy nauke // Zakon i pravo. — 2008. — № 10. — S. 46–48.

12. Rossiyskoe grazhdanskoe pravo: uchebnik: v 2 t. T. 1: Obshchaya chast. Veshchnoe pravo. Nasledstvennoe pravo. Intellektualnye prava. Lichnye neimushchestvennye prava / otv. red. E. A. Sukhanov. — M.: Statut, 2015. — 958 s.

13. Rudakova V. D. Grazhdansko-pravovoy status publichnykh yuridicheskikh lits: avtoref. dis. … kand. yurid. nauk. — M., 2014. — 28 s.

14. Sukhanov E. A. Eshche raz o yuridicheskikh litsakh — nesobstvennikakh // Pravovedenie. — 2017. — № 3. — S. 130–141.

15. Sukhanov E. A. Problemy kodifikatsii korporativnogo i veshchnogo prava: izbrannye trudy, 2013–2017. — M.: Statut, 2018. — 496 s.

16. Sukhanov E. A. Problemy reformirovaniya Grazhdanskogo kodeksa Rossii: izbrannye trudy 2008–2021 gg. — M.: Statut, 2013. — 494 s.

17. Uskov O. Yu. Yuridicheskie litsa publichnogo prava: ponyatie i vidy // Zhurnal rossiyskogo prava. — 2010. — № 6. — S. 101–111.

18. Chirkin V. E. Eshche raz o yuridicheskom litse publichnogo prava // Zhurnal rossiyskogo prava. — 2006. — № 5. — S. 94–104.

19. Chirkin V. E. Yuridicheskoe litso publichnogo prava // Zhurnal rossiyskogo prava. — 2005. — № 5. — S. 16–26.

20. Shershenevich G. F. Uchebnik russkago grazhdanskago prava. — SPb.: Izd-e br. Bashmakovykh, 1907. — 815 s.

21. Yuridicheskie litsa v rossiyskom grazhdanskom prave: monografiya: v 3 t. / A. A. Ayurova, O. A. Belyaeva, M. M. Vildanova [i dr.]; pod red. A. V. Gabova. — M.: Infra-M, 2019. — T. 2. — 352 s.

22. Yakovlev V. F. Grazhdansko-pravovoy metod regulirovaniya obshchestvennykh otnosheniy. — Sverdlovsk: Nauka, 1972. — 212 s.

23. Yastrebov O. Ya. Problema otraslevoy prinadlezhnosti yuridicheskogo litsa v rossiyskom pravovedenii // Yuridicheskiy mir. — 2010. — № 4. — S. 42–46.

24. Jastrebov O. The Use of the Category of «Legal Persons of Public Law» in Foreign Legal Instruments // Middle-East Journal of Scientific Research 20(11):1541-1545, 2014. — URL: https://www.idosi.org/mejsr/mejsr20(11)14/38.pdf (data obrashcheniya: 12.02.2022)