Preview

Actual Problems of Russian Law

Advanced search

Particular Cruelty as an Evaluative Concept in Criminal Law

https://doi.org/10.17803/1994-1471.2024.161.4.142-148

Abstract

The element of particular cruelty in the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation is reflected in Art. 63 as an aggravating circumstance, as well as a classifying element in Art. 105, 111, 112, 131 and 132, etc. However, law does not disclose the content of this element. Along with the concept of «particular cruelty,» the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation operates with other, similar terms: torture, torment, bullying, sadism, torture. The content and correlation of the concepts under consideration seem ambiguous, which is the subject of discussion in the doctrine of criminal law. Judicial practice also testifies to the unresolved nature of this issue, which results in the absence of a unified approach in similar cases. The paper, among other things, substantiates the need to replace the concept of «particular cruelty» with the concept of «sadism» in Art. 131 and 132 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation. The thesis is put forward that particular cruelty can occur when committing crimes, the object of which is not only social relations that characterize the individual, but also the safety of public health and public morality.

About the Author

N. M. Aubakirova-Ter-Grigoryan
Kutafin Moscow State Law University (MSAL)
Russian Federation

Nalini M. Aubakirova-Ter-Grigoryan - Postgraduate Student, Department of Criminal Law

 Moscow



References

1. Andreeva L. A., Konstantinov P. Yu. Vliyanie zhestokosti prestupnogo povedeniya na ugolovnuyu otvetstvennost. — SPb.: Yuridicheskiy tsentr-Press, 2002. — 207 s.

2. Borisenkova N. V. Ugolovno-pravovaya otsenka zhestokosti: avtoref. dis. … kand. yurid. nauk. — M., 2005. — 29 s.

3. Borkov V. N. Otgranichenie pytki ot primeneniya nasiliya ili spetsialnykh sredstv pri prevyshenii dolzhnostnykh polnomochiy // Ugolovnoe pravo. — 2022. — № 12. — S. 3–9.

4. Gladkikh G. Yu. Ugolovnaya otvetstvennost za pytki v Rossiyskoy Federatsii: avtoref. dis. … kand. yurid. nauk. — Rostov n/D, 2004. — 26 s.

5. Kommentariy k Ugolovnomu kodeksu RF / pod red. V. T. Tomina, V. V. Sverchkova. — M.: Yurayt, 2009. — 1301 s.

6. Menshikova A. G. Sootnoshenie ponyatiy «osobaya zhestokost», «izdevatelstvo» i «mucheniya» primenitelno k p. «v» ch. 2 st. 112 UK RF // Rossiyskiy yuridicheskiy zhurnal. — 2014. — № 4. — S. 65–70.

7. Naumov A. V. Praktika primeneniya Ugolovnogo kodeksa Rossiyskoy Federatsii: kommentariy sudebnoy praktiki i doktrinalnoe tolkovanie / pod red. G. M. Reznika. — M.: Volters Kluver, 2005. — 926 s.

8. Nauchno-prakticheskoe posobie po primeneniyu UK RF / pod red. V. M. Lebedeva. — M.: Norma, 2005. — 919 s.

9. Osobennaya chast Ugolovnogo kodeksa Rossiyskoy Federatsii: kommentariy, sudebnaya praktika, statistika / pod obshch. red. V. M. Lebedeva; otv. red. A. V. Galakhova. — M.: Gorodets, 2009. — 1167 s.

10. Popov A. N. Ubiystva pri otyagchayushchikh obstoyatelstvakh. — SPb.: Yuridicheskiy tsentr-Press, 2003. — 896 s.

11. Popova N. P. Otvetstvennost za prestupleniya, sovershennye s osoboy zhestokostyu: dis. … kand. yurid. nauk. — M., 2005. — 195 s.

12. Radzhabov R. M. Sootnoshenie ponyatiya «osobaya zhestokost» so smezhnymi otsenochnymi kategoriyami // Rossiyskiy sledovatel. — 2008. — № 13. — S. 13–15.

13. Trishina Zh. V. Osobaya zhestokost kak sposob soversheniya prestupleniy protiv lichnosti: ugolovno-pravovye i kriminologicheskie problemy: avtoref. dis. … kand. yurid. nauk. — Saratov, 2009. — 22 s

14.


Supplementary files

Review

For citations:


Aubakirova-Ter-Grigoryan N.M. Particular Cruelty as an Evaluative Concept in Criminal Law. Actual Problems of Russian Law. 2024;19(4):142-148. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17803/1994-1471.2024.161.4.142-148

Views: 312


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1994-1471 (Print)
ISSN 2782-1862 (Online)