TACTICAL PECULIARITIES OF INTERROGATIONS IN CASES OF VIOLATIONS OF PRIVACY

Abstract

This article discusses some of the features of different types of tactical interrogations in cases of violations of privacy. The author justifies that characteristics such as the completeness and relevance, objectivity and efficiency of descriptions are stem-forming in all sorts of interrogation. It is stated that the characteristics of interrogations are relized in quite a specific way: communication is the basis for questioning between the investigator and the parties to it. Among those from whom you may need to obtain information during investigation of criminal violations of privacy can be found the following categories: the victim, a witness, an expert, the suspect or the accused. The article considers the problem of objectivity when questioning descriptions as misinformation. It is recommended that the investigator should choose the tactics of interrogation, take into account the interest of persons under interrogation in the outcome of the case, particularly the establishment of psychological contact and effective use of techniques aimed at preventing attempts to perjury. Based on examples from the investigative practices, other recommendations for the interrogation to ensure its completeness and objectivity are provvided.