Theoretical and Legal Characteristics of Machine-Readable Law
https://doi.org/10.17803/1994-1471.2024.165.8.022-037
Abstract
The idea of automating law and legal activity has become increasingly popular in the scientific legal environment in recent years. One of the ways of such automation is to transform legislation into a machine-readable form. This could provide the possibility of automatic application of the law, increase legal certainty, and make the law accessible to the user. The adoption in 2021 of the Concept for the Development of Machine-Readable Law Technologies became one of important steps towards the introduction of machine-readable law in Russia. It seems that for the successful development of this area, we need a comprehensive theoretical and legal understanding of a new phenomenon for the domestic legal theory, namely: machine-readable law. Using formal logical methods, the author gives a definition of machine-readable law based on the essential and necessary features of the phenomenon under consideration. The paper provides a list of mandatory and optional features of machine-readable law. Special attention is paid to the issues of algorithmization of law and the use of legal ontologies. The paper highlights the main consequences of machine-readable law relating both to the law-making stage and to the stage of using machine-readable law. Such consequences include various types of testability of machine-readable law, the possibility of automatic interpretation, enforcement and direct implementation of machine-readable legal regulations. The author provides the concept of machine-readable law in the broadest sense of the word, covering not only legal regulations, but also the content of smart contracts, machine-readable powers of attorney. The paper also deals with the issues of machine-executable law and the related transition from legal normativity to technological normativity. This work contributes to the theoretical and legal understanding of machine-readable law and can contribute to its successful development in Russia.
About the Author
A. A. PerevozkinRussian Federation
Andrey A. Perevozkin , Postgraduate Student, Department of Theoretical and Public Law Disciplines, Institute of State and Law
Tyumen
References
1. Bakov A. A. Teoreticheskie osnovy informatiki: opredelenie ponyatiya algoritm // Vestnik MGPU. Seriya «Informatika i informatizatsiya obrazovaniya». — 2008. — № 16. — S. 26–28.
2. Baranov P. P. Problemy ontologii prava // Filosofiya prava. — 2013. — № 5 (60). — S. 97–103.
3. Byrdin E. N. Teoriya gosudarstva i prava (v skhemakh, tablitsakh i opredeleniyakh): uchebno-metodicheskoe posobie. — Tyumen: TyumGU, 2018. — 104 s.
4. Vashkevich A. M. Mashinochitaemoe pravo: pravo kak elektrichestvo. — M., 2019. — 256 s.
5. Gaydamakin A. A. Semanticheskie otnosheniya kak osnova formalnogo yazyka prava // Nauchnyy vestnik Omskoy akademii MVD Rossii. — 2012. — № 2 (45). — S. 80–85.
6. Zenin S. S., Kuteynikov D. L., Izhaev O. A., Yapryntsev I. M. Pravotvorchestvo v usloviyakh algoritmizatsii prava // Lex russica. — 2020. — № 7 (164). — S. 97–104.
7. Lipchanskaya M. A., Privalov S. A. Razvitie tekhnologiy mashinochitaemogo prava: teoreticheskie problemy i perspektivy // Zhurnal rossiyskogo prava. — 2022. — T. 26 — № 10. — S. 85–96.
8. Mirolyubova S. Yu. Pravovye ontologii v mashinochitaemom formate — instrument prodvizheniya yuridicheskikh znaniy v semanticheskoy seti // Monitoring pravoprimeneniya. — 2022. — № 1 (42). — S. 39–45.
9. Ponkin I. V., Lapteva A. I. Pravo i tsifra: Mashinochitaemoe pravo, tsifrovye modeli-dvoyniki, tsifrovaya formalizatsiya i tsifrovaya onto-inzheneriya v prave: uchebnik / Konsortsium «Analitika. Pravo. Tsifra». — M.: Buki Vedi, 2021. — 174 s.
10. Poryvaeva N. F. Algoritmizatsiya prava: dis. … kand. yurid. nauk. — M., 2022. — 186 s.
11. Rubashkin V. Sh. Ontologicheskaya semantika. Znaniya. Ontologii. Ontologicheski orientirovannye metody informatsionnogo analiza tekstov. — M.: Fizmatlit, 2013. — 348 s.
12. Truntsevskiy Yu. V. Zakon kak kod i pretsizionnoe pravo v rakurse datifikatsii // Zhurnal zarubezhnogo zakonodatelstva i sravnitelnogo pravovedeniya. — 2021. — T. 17. — № 1. — S. 49–67.
13. Fedorova G. N. Informatsionnye sistemy: uchebnik dlya studentov uchrezhdeniy srednego professionalnogo obrazovaniya. — 3-e izd., ster. — M.: Akademiya, 2013. — 208 s.
14. Khabrieva T. Ya., Chernogor N. N. Budushchee prava. Nasledie akademika V. S. Styopina i yuridicheskaya nauka. — M.: Rossiyskaya akademiya nauk; Institut zakonodatelstva i sravnitelnogo pravovedeniya pri Pravitelstve RF; Infra-M, 2020. — 176 s.
15. Yarakhmedovich A. A. Pravovaya priroda smart-kontrakta // Vestnik SGYuA. — 2019. — № 5 (130). — S. 103– 106.
16. Andersson H. Computational Law: Law That Works Like Software. — CodeX: The Stanford Center for Legal Informatics, 2014. — P. 1–25.
17. Brownsword R. Artificial Intelligence and Legal Singularity: The Thin End of the Wedge, the Thick End of the Wedge, and the Rule of Law // Is Law Computable? Critical Perspectives on Law and Artificial Intelligence / S. Deakin, Ch. Markou (eds). — Hart Publishing, 2020. — P. 135–160.
18. Casey A., Niblett A. Self-Driving Laws // University of Toronto Law Journal. — 2016. — No. 66. — P. 429–442.
19. Diver L. Digisprudence: Code as Law Rebooted. — Edinburgh University Press Ltd., 2022. — 264 p.
20. Genesereth M. Computational Law: The Cop in the Backseat. — CodeX: The Stanford Center for Legal Informatics, 2015.
21. Hildebrandt M. Legal and Technological Normativity: more (and less) than twin sisters // Techne. — Vol. 12. — Iss. 3. — 2008. — P. 169–183.
22. Hildebrandt M. Code-driven Law: Freezing the Future and Scaling the Past // Is Law Computable? Critical Perspectives on Law and Artificial Intelligence / S. Deakin, Ch. Markou (eds). — Hart Publishing, 2020. — P. 67–84.
23. Mohun J., Roberts A. Cracking the code: Rulemaking for humans and machines. OECD Working Papers on Public Governance. — No. 42. — 2020. — P. 1–109.
24. Waddington M. Machine-consumable legislation: A legislative drafter’s perspective — human v. artificial intelligence // The Loophole. — 2019. — June. — No. 2. — P. 21–52.
25. Zalnieriute M., Crawford L. B., Boughey J., Moses L. B., Logan S. From Rule of Law to Statute Drafting Legal Issues for Algorithms in Government Decision-Making // The Cambridge Handbook of the Law of Algorithms / W. Barfield (ed.). — Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2021. — P. 251–372.
Review
For citations:
Perevozkin A.A. Theoretical and Legal Characteristics of Machine-Readable Law. Actual Problems of Russian Law. 2024;19(8):22-37. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17803/1994-1471.2024.165.8.022-037