Preview

Actual Problems of Russian Law

Advanced search

Property Separation. Responsibility of Heirs as a Case Study

https://doi.org/10.17803/1994-1471.2024.165.8.085-099

Abstract

The paper is devoted to the problem of legal separation of the testator’s property from the property of the heirs. The legal separation of property is understood as giving it a specific legal regime, including the division of property into different pools of assets owed to different creditors. In the comparative legal aspect, the author examines the practical advantages and disadvantages of various models of legal separation of inherited property or the absence of separation. The paper analyzes the problems of Russian regulation of the liability of heirs: the legislative certainty of the liability model; the perception of this model by judicial practice and doctrine; the fairness of the current distribution of risks of insolvency and destruction of inherited property between creditors of the heir and the testator; features of bankruptcy of the estate. Using the case of inherited property, general conclusions are formulated concerning the phenomenon of detached property as an independent phenomenon of civil law, different from the institution of limited liability and the phenomenon of a legal entity.

About the Author

K. Yu. Ibragimov
St. Petersburg State University
Russian Federation

Konstantin Yu. Ibragimov, Postgraduate Student

St. Petersburg



References

1. Vnukov N. A. Otvetstvennost naslednikov po delam nasledodatelya: aktualnye voprosy teorii i praktiki // Sovremennoe pravo. — 2009. — № 1. — S. 74–76.

2. Zazulina L. D. Zashchita prav kreditorov v sluchae smerti dolzhnika po zakonodatelstvu Rossii i Frantsii // Notarius. — 2020. — № 2. — S. 45–48.

3. Malyshev K. I. Istoricheskiy ocherk konkursnogo protsessa. — SPb.: Tip. tovarishchestva «Obshchestvennaya polza», 1871. — 455 s.

4. Manukyan D. G. Otvetstvennost naslednikov po dolgam nasledodatelya // Obrazovanie i pravo. — 2017. — № 4. — S. 199–204.

5. Mekhanizmy bankrotstva i ikh rol v obespechenii blagosostoyaniya cheloveka: monografiya / A. Z. Bobyleva, D. E. Gorev, Yu. A. Zaytseva [i dr.]; otv. red. S. A. Karelina, I. V. Frolov. — M.: Yustitsinform, 2022. — 312 s.

6. Mozhilyan S. A. Osparivanie sdelok pri bankrotstve umershego grazhdanina: aktualnye voprosy sudebnoy praktiki // Arbitrazhnye spory. — 2020. — № 4. — S. 107–116.

7. Nasledstvennoe pravo: postateynyy kommentariy k statyam 1110–1185, 1224 Grazhdanskogo kodeksa Rossiyskoy Federatsii [Elektronnoe izdanie. Redaktsiya 1.0] / otv. red. E. Yu. Petrov. — M.: M-Logos, 2018. — 656 s.

8. Osnovy nasledstvennogo prava Rossii, Germanii, Frantsii / Yu. B. Gongalo, K. A. Mikhalev, E. Yu. Petrov [i dr.]; pod obshch. red. E. Yu. Petrova. — M.: Statut, 2015. — 271 s.

9. Ostanina E. A. Bankrotstvo nasledstvennoy massy: analiz izmeneniy zakonodatelstva // Nasledstvennoe pravo. — 2015. — № 4. — S. 33–38.

10. Panichkin V. B. Trebovaniya kreditorov k nasledstvu i osvobozhdenie nasledstvennogo imushchestva ot obremeneniy v prave SShA // Nasledstvennoe pravo. — 2010. — № 3. — S. 32–34.

11. Permyakov A. V. Ob otvetstvennosti po dolgam nasledodatelya // Notarius. — 2016. — № 5. — S. 31–34.

12. Petrov E. Yu. Nasledstvennoe pravo Rossii: sostoyanie i perspektivy razvitiya (sravnitelno-pravovoe issledovanie). — M.: M-Logos, 2017. — 152 s.

13. Pokrovskiy I. A. Istoriya rimskogo prava. — URL: https://civil.consultant.ru/elib/books/25/.

14. Rimskoe chastnoe pravo: uchebnik / koll. avtorov; pod red. I. B. Novitskogo, I. S. Pereterskogo. — M.: Knorus, 2014. — 608 s.

15. Sintsov G. V., Feoktistov D. E. Otvetstvennost naslednikov po dolgam nasledodatelya: nekotorye voprosy pravovogo regulirovaniya i pravoprimeneniya // Nasledstvennoe pravo. — 2019. — № 2. — S. 34–37.

16. Folgerova Yu. N. Grazhdansko-pravovaya otvetstvennost naslednikov po dolgam nasledodatelya // Nasledstvennoe pravo. — 2010. — № 3. — S. 16–19.

17. Shishmareva T. P. Pravovoe regulirovanie otvetstvennosti naslednikov po obyazatelstvam nasledodatelya pri nedostatochnosti nasledstvennoy massy // Zakony Rossii: opyt, analiz, praktika. — 2018. — № 10. — S. 41–45.

18. Shishmareva T. P. Problemy nesostoyatelnosti obosoblennykh imushchestvennykh mass // Predprinimatelskoe pravo. Prilozhenie «Pravo i biznes». — 2016. — № 3. — S. 50–54.

19. Hansmann H., Kraakman R. H. The Essential Role of Organizational Law (April 2000). NYU Law and Economics Working Paper No. 00-006; Harvard Law and Economics Discussion Paper 284; Yale ICF Working Paper No. 00-11.


Review

For citations:


Ibragimov K.Yu. Property Separation. Responsibility of Heirs as a Case Study. Actual Problems of Russian Law. 2024;19(8):85-99. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17803/1994-1471.2024.165.8.085-099

Views: 327


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1994-1471 (Print)
ISSN 2782-1862 (Online)