Preview

Actual Problems of Russian Law

Advanced search

Ensuring Confidentiality and Privacy in Criminal Proceedings: A Comparative Legal Analysis of the Russian Federation and the Republic of Kazakhstan Experience

https://doi.org/10.17803/1994-1471.2024.167.10.149-156

Abstract

The paper examines the limitations of personal rights in criminal proceedings, as well as the risks associated with the lack of compliance with security measures due to the unlawful disclosure of preliminary investigation data. During the research, scientific methods such as analysis, comparison, and expert assessment were used. The study resulted in the identification of significant problems in the current criminal procedure legislation of the Russian Federation and the Republic of Kazakhstan in the area of observing the personal rights of a person and citizen, as well as ensuring the confidentiality of criminal case materials. Among these are lack of differentiation of principles establishing inviolability in various spheres of life; lack of a clear mechanism and tools for ensuring confidentiality in criminal proceedings; the optional nature of Article 161 of the Criminal Procedure Code of the Russian Federation, which determines the inadmissibility of disclosing preliminary investigation materials, etc. In studying these problems, possible ways and means of solving them were developed, such as: introducing a special chapter in the Criminal Procedure Code regulating issues of ensuring confidentiality in criminal proceedings; giving an imperative nature to Article 161 of the Criminal Procedure Code of the Russian Federation; differentiation of the principles of criminal procedure in accordance with various spheres of life.

About the Author

E. A. Lavrushko
Orenburg State University; Kazakh Russian International University
Russian Federation

Elena A. Lavrushko, Postgarduate Student; Master of Law, Lecturer, Law Department 

Orenburg



References

1. Efremova M. A. K voprosu ob ugolovnoy otvetstvennosti za razglashenie dannykh predvaritelnogo rassledovaniya // Vestnik Kazanskogo yuridicheskogo instituta MVD Rossii. — 2015. — № 4 (22). — S. 34–37.

2. Metelskiy P. S. Ugolovnaya otvetstvennost za razglashenie dannykh predvaritelnogo rassledovaniya (st. 310 UK RF) // Vestnik Novosibirskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya «Pravo». — 2008. — № 1. — S. 68–74.

3. Novikova M. A. Rassledovanie razglasheniya dannykh predvaritelnogo rassledovaniya i svedeniy o merakh bezopasnosti, primenyaemykh v otnoshenii uchastnikov ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva: avtoref. dis. … kand. yurid. nauk. — M., 2009. — 75 s.

4. Smirnov A. V., Kalinovskiy K. B. Kommentariy k UPK RF / pod red. A. V. Smirnova. — 5‑e izd., pererab. i dop. — M.: Prospekt, 2009. — 480 s.


Review

For citations:


Lavrushko E.A. Ensuring Confidentiality and Privacy in Criminal Proceedings: A Comparative Legal Analysis of the Russian Federation and the Republic of Kazakhstan Experience. Actual Problems of Russian Law. 2024;19(10):149-156. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17803/1994-1471.2024.167.10.149-156

Views: 87


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1994-1471 (Print)
ISSN 2782-1862 (Online)