Development of the Doctrine of Civil Procedural Capacity and Legal Capacity (in Memory of Professor Maria S. Shakaryan)
https://doi.org/10.17803/1994-1471.2024.159.2.036-045
Abstract
The paper is dedicated to the memory of Honored Lawyer of the RSFSR, Doctor of Law, Professor Maria S. Shakaryan. The paper highlights some historical aspects of the development of the doctrine of civil procedural legal capacity and legal capacity, highlights the contribution that Professor Maria S. Shakaryan made to the study of these categories. It is noted that many of the issues that Professor Shakaryan raised in her works remain controversial in the science of civil procedural law to this day. Special attention is paid to dissemination of the concepts of procedural capacity and legal capacity to all participants in procedural relations, as well as to the court. The author argues that this approach destroys the integrity of the concept of not only procedural capacity, but also procedural legal capacity. Separately, the author examines the issue of the need to involve citizens recognized by the court as legally incompetent to participate in person in court proceedings. Attention is drawn to the problem of ensuring adequate protection of the rights of citizens recognized by the court as legally incompetent, which is relevant in practice and unresolved in civil procedural legislation.
About the Author
D. Yu. IonovaRussian Federation
Dina Yu. Ionova, Cand. Sci. (Law), Associate Professor, Department of Civil and Administrative Proceedure
References
1. Abramov S. N. Grazhdanskiy protsess. — M., 1948. — 483 s.
2. Alekhina S. A. K voprosu o pravosposobnosti publichno-pravovykh obrazovaniy v administrativnom sudoproizvodstve // Zakony Rossii: opyt, analiz, praktika. — 2016. — № 5. — S. 3–10.
3. Afanasev S. F. O nekotorykh aspektakh prava na sudebnuyu zashchitu nedeesposobnykh i ogranichenno deesposobnykh lits // Vestnik grazhdanskogo protsessa. — 2014. — № 5. — S. 67–83.
4. Vaskovskiy E. V. Kurs grazhdanskogo protsessa: Subekty i obekty protsessa, protsessualnye otnosheniya i deystviya. — M.: Statut, 2016. — 624 s.
5. Grazhdanskoe protsessualnoe pravo Rossii: kurs dlya spetsialistov, magistrantov i aspirantov / S. F. Afanasev [i dr.]; pod red. S. F. Afanaseva. — M.: Yurayt, 2013. — 879 s.
6. Grazhdanskoe protsessualnoe pravo: uchebnik: v 2 t. / pod red. P. V. Krasheninnikova. T. 1: Obshchaya chast. — M.: Statut, 2020. — 489 s.
7. Grazhdanskiy protsess Rossii: uchebnik / pod red. M. A. Vikut. — M., 2004. — 459 s.
8. Gurvich M. A. Pravo na isk // Izbrannye trudy. T. 1. — Krasnodar, 2006. — 672 s.
9. Gusev V. G. Grazhdanskaya protsessualnaya pravosposobnost: dis. … kand. yurid. nauk. — Saratov, 1996. — 161 s.
10. Zeyder N. B. Grazhdanskie protsessualnye pravootnosheniya. — Saratov: Izd-vo Saratovskogo universiteta, 1965. — 74 s.
11. Ionova D. Yu., Kazikhanova S. S. Aktualnye problemy sudebnoy zashchity prav nesovershennoletnikh, ne dostigshikh chetyrnadtsati let // Zakony Rossii: opyt, analiz, praktika. — 2021. — № 8. — S. 42–48.
12. Melnikov A. A. Pravovoe polozhenie lichnosti v grazhdanskom protsesse. — M., 1969. — 247 s.
13. Luchina S. V. Vzaimodeystvie subektov, obladayushchikh tozhdestvennymi materialno-pravovymi interesami v grazhdanskom protsesse: dis. … kand. yurid. nauk. Volgograd. — 2001. — 215 s.
14. Nefedev E. A. Uchebnik russkogo grazhdanskogo sudoproizvodstva (izdanie trete 1900 g.). — Krasnodar. — 2005. — 480 s.
15. Osokina G. L. Grazhdanskiy protsess. Obshchaya chast. — M.: Yurist, 2004. — 669 s.
16. Samsonov N. V. K voprosu o ponyatii i vidakh grazhdanskoy protsessualnoy pravosposobnosti // Sovremennoe pravo. — 2018. — № 1. — S. 81–85.
17. Sakhnova T. V. Kurs grazhdanskogo protsessa. — 2-e izd., pererab. i dop. — M.: Statut, 2014. — 784 s.
18. Sergun A. K. Protsessualnaya pravosposobnost i pravosubektnost (v literature i v GPK) // Trudy VYuZI. T. 38. — M., 1975. — S. 72–102.
19. Sovetskoe grazhdanskoe protsessualnoe pravo: uchebnik / V. P. Volozhanin, A. F. Kozlov, K. I. Komissarov [i dr.]; pod obshch. red. K. S. Yudelsona. — M.: Yurid. lit., 1965.
20. Tumanov D. A., Alekhina S. A. K voprosu o pravovom kharaktere spora i pravosposobnosti kak predposylkakh prava na predyavlenie iska // Zhurnal rossiyskogo prava. — 2009. — № 12. — S. 95–105.
21. Shakaryan M. S. Subekty sovetskogo grazhdanskogo protsessualnogo pravootnosheniya: avtoref. dis. … d-ra yurid. nauk. — M., 1972. — 41 s.
22. Shakaryan M. S. Subekty sovetskogo grazhdanskogo protsessualnogo prava (1970) // Izbrannye trudy. — SPb., 2014. — 880 s.
23. Yudin A. V. Novoe ponimanie kategorii «grazhdanskaya protsessualnaya nedeesposobnost» i delo Shtukaturova // Tsivilist. — 2012. — № 1. — S. 108–113.
Review
For citations:
Ionova D.Yu. Development of the Doctrine of Civil Procedural Capacity and Legal Capacity (in Memory of Professor Maria S. Shakaryan). Actual Problems of Russian Law. 2024;19(2):36-45. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17803/1994-1471.2024.159.2.036-045