International Legal Protection of Cultural Heritage: Terminological Problems and Periodization of its Development
https://doi.org/10.17803/1994-1471.2024.168.11.136-146
Abstract
The scientific paper is devoted to the study of issues of terminology in the field of international legal protection of cultural heritage and the periodization of the development of this protection. The author traces the history of the enshrinement of the concepts of «cultural heritage» and «cultural property» in international law. These terms are highlighted by the author as the most commonly used general concepts for designating objects of protection in international legal acts in the sphere of protection of architectural monuments, works of fine art, archaeological finds, customs, forms of expression and representation, etc. Attention is drawn to the synonymy of the two mentioned terms in practice, as well as when they are used in international legal acts. At the same time, they are distinguished from a theoretical point of view. In this regard, the reasons for the transition in international law from the term «cultural values» to the concept of «cultural heritage» are explained. The definition of cultural heritage is formulated from the point of view of international law. The periodization of the development of international legal protection of these objects and manifestations is being carried out, which is made possible, among other things, by the aforementioned changes in the terminology used. There are two broad stages in the development of this protection: from 1874 to 1954 and from 1954 to the present day. The second stage is further divided into two parts: from 1954 to 1972 and from 1972 to the present day.
About the Author
T. D. GibadullinRussian Federation
Timur D. Gibadullin, Cand. Sci. (Law), Senior Lecturer, Department of International and European Law
Kazan
References
1. Boguslavskiy M. M. Kulturnye tsennosti v mezhdunarodnom oborote: pravovye aspekty. - 2-e izd., pererab. i dop. - M.: Norma: Infra-M, 2012. - 416 s. + vkl. (16 s.).
2. Boguslavskiy M. M. Mezhdunarodnaya okhrana kulturnykh tsennostey. - M.: Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya, 1979. - 192 s.
3. Galkova O. V. Kulturnoe nasledie: struktura i soderzhanie ponyatiya // Elektronnyy nauchno-obrazovatelnyy zhurnal VGPU «Grani poznaniya». - Dekabr 2010. - № 4 (9). - URL: http://www.grani.vspu.ru/jurnal/9.
4. Knyazkina A. K. Kulturnye tsennosti: chto pod nimi ponimaetsya v mezhdunarodnom i ugolovnom prave? // Aktual’nye problemy rossijskogo prava. - 2008. - № 2. - S. 192-198.
5. Molchanov S. N. Ob ispolzovanii ponyatiy «kulturnye tsennosti» i «kulturnoe nasledie (dostoyanie)» v mezhdunarodnom prave (informatsionno-analiticheskiy obzor) // Moskovskiy zhurnal mezhdunarodnogo prava. - 2000. - № 2. - S. 20-27.
6. Neshataeva V. O. Kulturnye tsennosti: tsena i pravo. - M.: Izdatelskiy dom Vysshey shkoly ekonomiki, 2013. - 208 s.
7. Blake J. International Cultural Heritage Law. - Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015. - XXII, 359 p.
8. Blake J. On Defining the Cultural Heritage // The International and Comparative Law Quarterly. - 2000. - Vol. 49. - № 1. - P. 61-85.
9. Forrest S. International Law and the Protection of Cultural Heritage. - London; New York: Routledge, 2010. - XXII, 458 p.
10. Francioni F. Cultural Heritage // Max Plank Encyclopedia of Public International Law. - URL: https://opil.ouplaw.com/view/10.1093/law:epil/9780199231690/law-9780199231690-e1392?prd=MPIL (data obrashcheniya: 22.02.2022).
11. Frigo M. Cultural property v. cultural heritage: A «battle of concepts» in international law? // International Review of the Red Cross. - 2004. - Vol. 86. - № 854. - P. 367-378.
12. Nafziger J. A. R. Frontiers of Cultural Heritage Law. - Leiden; Boston: Brill Nijhoff, 2021. - XIV, 402 p.
13. Nafziger J. A. R., Paterson R. K. Cultural heritage law // Handbook on the Law of Cultural Heritage and International Trade / ed. by J. A. R. Nafziger, R. K. Paterson. - Cheltenham, UK; Northampton, MA, USA: Edward Elgar, 2014. - P. 1-18.
14. Odendahl K. Global conventions for the protection of cultural heritage // Cultural Heritage and Legal Aspects in Europe / ed. by M. Guštin, T. Nypan. - Koper: Institute for Mediterranean Heritage, Institute for Corporation and Public Law, Science and Research Centre, University of Primorska, 2010. - P. 100-113.
15. Prott L. V., O’Keefe P. J. ‘Cultural Heritage’ or ‘Cultural Property’? // International Journal of Cultural Property. - 1992. - Vol. 1. - № 2. - P. 307-320.
16. Stamatoudi I. A. Cultural Property Law and Restitution: A Commentary to International Conventions and European Union Law. - Cheltenham, UK; Northampton, MA, USA: Edward Elgar, 2011. - X, 401 p.
17. Vrdoljak A. F., Francioni F. Introduction // The Oxford Handbook of International Cultural Heritage Law / ed. by A. F. Vrdoljak, F. Francioni. - Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2020. - P. 1-10.
Review
For citations:
Gibadullin T.D. International Legal Protection of Cultural Heritage: Terminological Problems and Periodization of its Development. Actual Problems of Russian Law. 2024;19(11):136-146. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17803/1994-1471.2024.168.11.136-146