Participation of Bodies, Organizations and Individuals in an Administrative Case to Render an Opinion hereon
https://doi.org/10.17803/1994-1471.2024.159.2.018-026
Abstract
The paper is devoted to examination of some problems related to the participation of bodies, organizations and individuals in administrative cases in order to render a decision hereon. The author analyzes the grounds and objectives of such participation, determines the range of subjects obliged to render an opinion and the procedure for their involvement (entry) into the judicial administrative procedure, elucidates peculiarities of a procedural standing of the relevant bodies, organizations and individuals. On the basis of the research, the author concludes that it can serve to improve the legislation on administrative proceedings and the practice of its application, in particular: on expediency of supplementing the CAP of the Russian Federation with norms that would allow bodies and individuals to be involved in giving opinions not only in cases provided for by the Code, but also in other cases when the court considers it necessary, on specificity of the mechanism involving commissioners for the rights of the child in the judicial administrative proceeding in relevant categories of cases that allows combining an active role of the court and the human rights function of the commissioner.
About the Author
S. M. MikhailovRussian Federation
Sergey M. Mikhailov, Cand. Sci. (Law), Associate Professor, Head of the Department of Civil and Administrative Procedure
References
1. Administrativnoe sudoproizvodstvo: uchebnik / pod red. d-ra yurid. nauk, prof. A. F. Voronova, d-ra yurid. nauk, prof. V. V. Molchanova. — M.: Statut, 2024. — 674 s.
2. Grazhdanskiy protsess: uchebnik / otv. red. V. V. Blazheev, E. E. Uksusova. — 2-e izd., pererab. i dop. — M.: Prospekt, 2023. — 688 s.
3. Grazhdanskoe protsessualnoe pravo: uchebnik: v 2 t. / pod red. P. V. Krasheninnikova. T. 2: Osobennaya chast. Proizvodstvo po otdelnym kategoriyam del. — M.: Statut, 2020. — 317 s.
4. Grazhdanskoe protsessualnoe pravo: uchebnik / S. A. Alekhina, V. V. Blazheev [i dr.]; pod red. M. S. Shakaryan. — M.: TK Velbi, Prospekt, 2004. — 584 s.
5. Dzhandosova E. V. Uchastie v grazhdanskom protsesse gosudarstvennykh organov i organov mestnogo samoupravleniya dlya dachi zaklyucheniya po delu: avtoref. dis. … kand. yurid. nauk. — M., 2006. — 24 s.
6. Kommentariy k Grazhdanskomu protsessualnomu kodeksu Rossiyskoy Federatsii / S. A. Alekhina, A. T. Bonner, V. V. Blazheev [i dr.]; otv. red. M. S. Shakaryan. — M.: TK Velbi, Prospekt, 2003. — 688 s.
7. Kulakova V. Yu. Uchastie v grazhdanskom protsesse gosudarstvennykh organov i organov mestnogo samoupravleniya: avtoref. dis. … kand. yurid. nauk. — M., 2001. — 25 s.
8. Mikhaylov S. M. Osparivanie upolnomochennymi po pravam cheloveka v RF resheniy, deystviy (bezdeystviya), narushayushchikh prava, svobody i zakonnye interesy grazhdan: nekotorye reshennye i nereshennye problemy // Uchenie o grazhdanskom protsesse: nastoyashchee i budushchee: sbornik dokladov na II Mezhdunarodnoy nauchnoy konferentsii pamyati M. K. Treushnikova, Moskva, 9 fevralya 2023 g. / pod red. V. V. Molchanova. — M., 2023. — S. 181–184.
9. Sakhnova T. V. Kurs grazhdanskogo protsessa: teoreticheskie nachala i osnovnye instituty — M.: Volters Kluver, 2008. — 696 s.
10. Chechot D. M. Izbrannye trudy po grazhdanskomu protsessu. — SPb.: Izdatelskiy dom S.-Peterb. gos. un-ta, Izd-vo yurid. f-ta S.-Peterb. gos. un-ta, 2005. — 616 s.
11. Shakaryan M. S. Izbrannye trudy / vstup. st. d-ra yurid. nauk, prof. A. T. Bonnera i dots. M. E. Mirzoyan. — SPb.: Izd. dom R. Aslanova «Yuridicheskiy tsentr», 2014. — 880 s.
Review
For citations:
Mikhailov S.M. Participation of Bodies, Organizations and Individuals in an Administrative Case to Render an Opinion hereon. Actual Problems of Russian Law. 2024;19(2):18-26. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17803/1994-1471.2024.159.2.018-026