Preview

Actual Problems of Russian Law

Advanced search

The Injunction to Pay under a Bank Guarantee as a Procedural Means of Interference in Guarantee Legal Relations

https://doi.org/10.17803/1994-1471.2024.167.10.070-080

Abstract

The paper analyzes the balance between the procedural institution of acceptance of interim measures by the courts and the material institution of ensuring the fulfillment of obligations by issuing independent (bank) guarantees. The author raises the issue of the intrusion of interim measures into the independent nature of the guarantee relationship and justifies the approach according to which such interim measures may be permissible if there are signs of abuse of the right by unscrupulous beneficiaries. The paper analyzes the practice of both arbitrazh courts and courts of general jurisdiction and the approaches of courts to the adoption of interim measures prohibiting banks from making payments under a bank guarantee. The author also touches upon the issues of the standard of proof when courts apply interim measures in guarantee relations. In conclusion, it is substantiated that alternative methods of restoring the rights of the principal or guarantor in the form of collecting unjustified enrichment from an unscrupulous beneficiary may not be effective enough.

About the Author

S. V. Gavrichkov
St. Petersburg Law Office «Glavnaya bukva»; Institute of the State and Law, Russian Academy of Sciences
Russian Federation

Stanislav V. Gavrichkov, Advocate; Senior Partner; Postgraduate Student 

Moscow



References

1. Alekseeva O. G., Aminov E. R., Bando M. V. [i dr.] Grazhdanskoe pravo: uchebnik: v 2 t. / pod red. B. M. Gongalo. T. 2. — 3‑e izd., pererab. i dop. — M.: Statut, 2018. — 560 s.

2. Bashilov B. I. Obespechitelnye mery po korporativnym sporam v arbitrazhnom protsesse Rossiyskoy Federatsii: dis. … kand. yurid. nauk. — M., 2019. — S. 144, 145.

3. Bevzenko R. S. Aktsessornost obespechitelnykh obyazatelstv: evropeyskaya pravovaya traditsiya i rossiyskaya praktika // Vestnik grazhdanskogo prava. — 2012. — T. 12. — № 5. — S. 4–36; № 6. — S. 5–48.

4. Braginskiy M. I., Vitryanskiy V. V. Dogovornoe pravo: obshchie polozheniya. — M., 1998. — S. 478–479.

5. Vishnevskiy A. A. Sovremennoe bankovskoe pravo: bankovsko-klientskie otnosheniya: sravnitelno-pravovye ocherki. — M.: Statut, 2013. — 349 s.

6. Erpyleva N. Yu. Struktura, forma i soderzhanie bankovskikh garantiy v mezhdunarodnom bankovskom prave // Bankovskoe pravo. — 2011. — № 2. — S. 41–48.

7. Efimova L. G. Pravovaya priroda nezavisimoy (bankovskoy) garantii // Pravovaya paradigma. — 2018. — T. 17. — № 4.

8. Kankhush D. Printsip nezavisimosti bankovskoy garantii: sravnitelno-pravovoy analiz // Bankovskoe pravo. — 2021. — № 4. — S. 44–51.

9. Karapetov A. G., Kosarev A. S. Standarty dokazyvaniya: analiticheskoe i empiricheskoe issledovanie // Vestnik ekonomicheskogo pravosudiya RF. Prilozhenie k ezhemesyachnomu zhurnalu. — 2019. — № 5. Spetsialnyy vypusk. — S. 3–96.

10. Zalog, bankovskaya garantiya i drugie sposoby obespecheniya ispolneniya obyazatelstv: Postateynyy kommentariy glavy 23 Grazhdanskogo kodeksa Rossiyskoy Federatsii / B. M. Gongalo, P. V. Krasheninnikov, L. Yu. Mikheeva [i dr.]; pod red. P. V. Krasheninnikova, B. M. Gongalo. — M.: Statut, 2010. — 238 s.

11. Sarbash S. V. Nekotorye problemy obespecheniya ispolneniya obyazatelstv // Vestnik VAS RF. — 2007. — № 7.

12. Smola A. A. Aktualnye problemy primeneniya arbitrazhnymi sudami obespechitelnykh mer // Vestnik Arbitrazhnogo suda Moskovskogo okruga. — 2019. — № 4. — S. 37–52.

13. Ovseyko S. Kommentariy k Konventsii OON o nezavisimykh garantiyakh i rezervnykh akkreditivakh // Bankovskoe pravo. — 2001. — № 3. — S. 54–64.

14. Melamed A. L. Bankovskaya garantiya — novyy institut v rossiyskom zakonodatelstve // Rossiyskaya yustitsiya. — 1995. — № 7. — S. 13.

15. Kolesnikova S. G., Teplyukova L. S. Primenenie arbitrazhnymi sudami obespechitelnykh mer v dele o bankrotstve // Arbitrazhnye spory. — 2021. — № 2. — S. 5–62.

16. Tay Yu. V., Budylin S. L. Obespechitelnye mery. Kak nam obustroit Rossiyu?! // Vestnik grazhdanskogo protsessa. — 2020. — № 4. — S. 89–130.

17. Shmitgoff K. Eksport: pravo i praktika mezhdunarodnoy torgovli. — M.: Yurid. lit., 1993. — S. 203.

18. Bane Ch. The Progressive Development of Commercial Law // Litowitz D. E. Perspectives on the Uniform Commercial Code. — Durham, 2001. — P. 3–12.

19. Errera J.‑M. Banking and Internal Management. — Paris: Eska, 1999. — P. 54–55.

20. Mattout J.‑P. International banking law: applicable law, international law, currencies and rates. — Paris: Revue Banque, 1996.


Review

For citations:


Gavrichkov S.V. The Injunction to Pay under a Bank Guarantee as a Procedural Means of Interference in Guarantee Legal Relations. Actual Problems of Russian Law. 2024;19(10):70-80. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17803/1994-1471.2024.167.10.070-080

Views: 99


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1994-1471 (Print)
ISSN 2782-1862 (Online)