Civil Society and its Institutions in the Theory of Interrelation between the Subjects of Constitutional Law
https://doi.org/10.17803/1994-1471.2025.172.3.052-066
Abstract
The author of the study has been developing the theory of the ratio between the subjects of constitutional law for a long time. The paper describes theoretical constructs, including the conceptual and categorical apparatus, methodology, and certain aspects that have been tested in practice in the process of expert activity. The essence of the theory lies in the fact that various actors with legal status influence on each other in many directions, not limited to legal relations, including states. The transformation of the realization of the right in recent years clearly demonstrates this statement. One of the components of doctrinal research is the consideration of various subjects through the prism of the variety of their relationships with other actors. In the work, the author makes an attempt of this kind of reflection in relation to civil society, which the author seems to be a full-fledged independent subject, and its institutions. At the same time, local self-government and state-public formations (public chambers, councils, public monitoring commissions, etc.) are not taken into account, since they are significantly influenced by the State. As a result, a set of author’s conclusions can be taken throughout the text of the work on the potential of individual subjects of constitutional law in terms of their involvement in public life. The application of the indicated positions may take place in the process of lawmaking, law enforcement, as well as for other doctrinal research on this or similar topics.
About the Author
S. A. VasilyevRussian Federation
Stanislav A. Vasilyev, Cand. Sci. (Law), Associate Professor, Head of the Department of Constitutional and Administrative Law; Senior Researcher, Institute of the State and Law
Sevastopol
References
1. Bogdanova N. A. Sistema nauki konstitutsionnogo prava. — M.: Yurist, 2001. — 254 s.
2. Vavilov N. S. Pravovoe regulirovanie deyatelnosti institutov grazhdanskogo obshchestva na munitsipalnom urovne: dis. … kand. yurid. nauk. — Kazan, 2017. — 191 s.
3. Gosudarstvenno-territorialnoe ustroystvo Rossii / A. G. Granberg, V. V. Kistanov, A. A. Adamesku [i dr.]; pod red. A. G. Grinberga, V. V. Kistanova. — M.: DeKA, 2003. — 446 s.
4. Grazhdanskoe obshchestvo: yuridicheskiy slovar-spravochnik / pod red. A. V. Malko i O. I. Tsybulevskoy. — M.: Prospekt, 2023. — 248 s. — DOI: 10.31085/9785392281718-2021-248.
5. Grebenkov G. V. Chelovek v pravovom bytii: Vvedenie v pravovuyu personologiyu: monografiya. — Donetsk: Donetskiy yuridicheskiy institut MVD Ukrainy, 2013. — 540 s.
6. Ellinek G. Obshchee uchenie o gosudarstve. — SPb.: Yuridicheskiy tsentr-Press, 2004. — 750 s.
7. Zaytsev S. Yu. Vzaimodeystvie transnatsionalnykh korporatsiy i gosudarstva: politologicheskiy analiz // Vestnik Povolzhskogo instituta upravleniya. — 2017. — T. 17. — № 6. — S. 37–45.
8. Zidentop L. Demokratiya v Evrope: per. s angl. / pod red. V. L. Inozemtseva. — M.: Logos, 2004. — 360 s.
9. Ivanov V. N., Frish A. S. Osnovnaya yacheyka sotsialisticheskogo obshchestva. — M.: Politizdat, 1975. — 287 s.
10. Isaev I. A. Ideya poryadka v konservativnoy perspektive: monografiya. — M.: Prospekt, 2015. — 400 s.
11. Kerimov A. D. Sovremennoe gosudarstvo: voprosy teorii. — M.: Norma, 2014. — 144 s.
12. Kin Dzh. Demokratiya i grazhdanskoe obshchestvo: per. s angl. / poslesl. M. A. Abramova. — M.: ProgressTraditsiya, 2001. — 400 s.
13. Koval V. N. Yuridicheskoe obrazovanie v Sevastopole: osobennosti i perspektivy // Zakon i pravoporyadok v tretem tysyacheletii: materialy mezhdunarodnoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii. — Kaliningrad: Kaliningradskiy filial Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta MVD Rossii, 2016. — S. 19–20.
14. Komarova V. V. Instituty grazhdanskogo obshchestva v stanovlenii transportnogo prava // Obrazovanie i pravo. — 2021. — № 5. — S. 72–79. — DOI: 10.24412/2076-1503-2021-5-72-79.
15. Kotlyarevskiy S. A. Pravovoe gosudarstvo i vneshnyaya politika. — M.: Tip. G. Lissnera i D. Sobko, 1909. — 428 s.
16. Kurochkin A. V. Pravovaya institutsionalizatsiya politicheskikh partiy v Rossiyskoy Federatsii: monografiya. — Kazan: Izd-vo Kazan. un-ta, 2014. — 254 s.
17. Kutafin O. E. Izbrannye trudy: v 7 t. T. 7: Rossiyskiy konstitutsionalizm: monografiya. — M.: Prospekt, 2016. — 544 s.
18. Kutafin O. E. Subekty konstitutsionnogo prava Rossiyskoy Federatsii kak yuridicheskie i priravnennye k nim litsa: monografiya. — M.: Prospekt, 2007. — 336 s.
19. Lebedev V. A. Konstitutsionnye prava i svobody cheloveka i grazhdanina v sovremennoy Rossii: monografiya. — M.: Prospekt, 2016. — 207 s.
20. Logacheva N. Yu. Kommercheskie organizatsii kak subekty konstitutsionno-pravovykh otnosheniy v Rossiyskoy Federatsii: avtoref. dis. … kand. yurid. nauk. — M., 2008. — 28 s.
21. Mariten Zh. Chelovek i gosudarstvo. — M.: Ideya-Press, 2000. — 195 s.
22. Marks K., Engels F. Sochineniya. T. 3. — M.: Gospolitizdat, 1954. — 650 s.
23. Maslova O. S. Energeticheskaya bezopasnost kak bazovyy element sistemy konstitutsionnogo stroya // Problemy prava. — 2016. — № 5. — S. 40–41.
24. Moklyak N. N. Sotsialnye otnosheniya: struktura i formy proyavleniya. — Kiev: Naukova dumka, 1986. — 205 s.
25. Monastyrskiy Yu. E. Materialno-pravovye osobennosti trebovaniy ob ubytkakh: monografiya. — M.: Statut, 2019. — 202 s.
26. Mosin S. A. Svoystva konstitutsionnogo printsipa dobrosovestnosti subektov pravootnosheniy // Pravo. Zhurnal Vysshey shkoly ekonomiki. — 2023. — № 1. — 27–45. — DOI: 10.17323/2072-8166.2023.1.27.45.
27. Nagaychuk A. F. Sotsialnye interesy: tekhnologii osushchestvleniya v politike. — SPb.: Izd-vo SPbGU, 2005. — 256 s.
28. Panchenko V. Yu. Pravovoe vzaimodeystvie kak vid sotsialnogo vzaimodeystviya: monografiya. — M.: Prospekt, 2022. — 232 s.
29. Politika sotsialnogo partnerstva (rossiyskiy i zarubezhnyy opyt) / otv. red. M. V. Kargalova, K. D. Krylov. — M.: TK Velbi, Prospekt, 2003. — 208 s.
30. Rayanov F. M. Teoriya pravovogo gosudarstva: monografiya. — M.: Yurlitinform, 2014. — 268 s.
31. Reysner M. A. Gosudarstvo: Gosudarstvo i obshchestvo. Gosudarstvennye formy. — M.: Lenand, 2018. — 296 s.
32. Tikhomirov Yu. A. Gosudarstvo: monografiya. — M.: Norma, 2015. — 320 s.
33. Khabrieva T. Ya., Chirkin V. E. Teoriya sovremennoy konstitutsii. — M.: Norma, 2007. — 319 s.
34. Khokhlov E. B. Ponyatie yuridicheskogo litsa: istoriya i sovremennaya traktovka // Gosudarstvo i pravo. — 1993. — № 9. — S. 149–155.
35. Khudyakov A. V. Pravookhranitelnaya deyatelnost politsii po obespecheniyu ekonomicheskoy bezopasnosti (rossiyskiy i zarubezhnyy opyt) // Aktualnye problemy upravleniya infrastrukturoy organov vnutrennikh del i obespecheniya ekonomicheskoy bezopasnosti: sbornik nauchnykh statey po materialam mezhdunarodnoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii (Moskva, 23 dekabrya 2015 g.). — M.: Akademiya upravleniya Ministerstva vnutrennikh del RF, 2016. — S. 264–268.
36. Chirkin V. E. Territorialnaya organizatsiya publichnoy vlasti: monografiya. — M.: Norma, 2019. — 208 s.
37. Chicherin B. N. Sobstvennost i gosudarstvo / sost., avtor vstup. st., komment.: A. I. Narezhnyy. — M.: Rosspen, 2010. — 926 s.
38. Shmitt K. Gosudarstvo i politicheskaya forma. — M., 2018. — 272 s.
39. Kavanagh S. A., Hawe P., Shiell A., Mallman M., Garvey K. Soft infrastructure: the critical community-level resources reportedly needed for program success // BMC Public Health. — 2022. — No. 22 (1). — DOI: 10.1186/s12889-022-12788-8.
Review
For citations:
Vasilyev S.A. Civil Society and its Institutions in the Theory of Interrelation between the Subjects of Constitutional Law. Actual Problems of Russian Law. 2025;20(3):52-66. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17803/1994-1471.2025.172.3.052-066