The Power of Prosecutors in the Field of Criminal Proceedings in Russia and Abroad
https://doi.org/10.17803/1994-1471.2025.172.3.149-155
Abstract
The paper analyzes the regulation of the prosecutor’s powers in the field of criminal proceedings in the legislation of a number of foreign countries. A comparison is made with the powers of the prosecutor in Russian criminal procedure legislation. It is noted that in the overwhelming majority of foreign countries the prosecutor is vested with a greater range of powers. According to Russian criminal procedure legislation, the prosecutor, having a large volume of powers in the conduct of a pre-trial investigation in the form of an inquiry, has a much smaller volume of powers in the conduct of a preliminary investigation, which, in the author’s opinion, is a shortcoming of the Russian criminal procedure law that requires elimination. The author concludes that in order to increase the efficiency of the prosecutor’s supervisory activities in the area of criminal proceedings, it seems quite reasonable to return to the prosecutor some of the powers lost after the 2007 reform, including those related to the initiation of criminal proceedings.
About the Author
S. V. KornakovaRussian Federation
Svetlana V. Kornakova, Cand. Sci. (Law), Associate Professor, Associate Professor, Department of Theory and History of State and Law
Irkutsk
References
1. Gasymov A. N. K voprosu o nadzornoy deyatelnosti prokurora v dosudebnom proizvodstve zarubezhnykh stran // Trudy Akademii upravleniya MVD Rossii. — 2023. — № 3 (67). — S. 88–96.
2. Golovko L. V. Arkhetipy dosudebnogo proizvodstva, vozmozhnye perspektivy razvitiya otechestvennogo predvaritelnogo sledstviya // Ugolovnoe sudoproizvodstvo. — 2014. — № 2. — S. 9–16.
3. Golovko L. V. Reformirovanie sledstvennykh organov v Rossii // Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. — 2013. — № 3. — S. 43–55.
4. Ilyutchenko N. V. Optimizatsiya ugolovnogo protsessa: opyt Avstrii // Aktual’nye problemy rossijskogo prava. — 2015. — № 15. — S. 178–183.
5. Kopylova I. N. Ustranenie prepyatstviy k rassmotreniyu sudom ugolovnogo dela: rossiyskaya i germanskaya modeli postroeniya instituta // Akademicheskiy yuridicheskiy zhurnal. — 2019. — T. 20. — № 3. — S. 42–48.
6. Malofeev I. V. Rol prokurora v osushchestvlenii funktsii ugolovnogo presledovaniya // Sibirskie ugolovnoprotsessualnye i kriminalisticheskie chteniya. — 2022. — № 3. — S. 5–16.
7. Khayrullina E. A. Polnomochiya prokurora v dosudebnom proizvodstve po ugolovnomu delu soglasno ugolovno-protsessualnomu zakonodatelstvu Frantsii // Vestnik ekonomiki, prava i sotsiologii. — 2011. — № 3. — S. 153–157.
8. Chubykin A. V. O polnomochiyakh prokurora na stadii vozbuzhdeniya ugolovnogo dela // Baikal Research Journal. — 2013. — № 4. — S. 26.
9. Shcherba S. P. Polnomochiya prokurorov na dosudebnykh stadiyakh v ugolovnom protsesse Germanii, Frantsii, Anglii, Italii i Ispanii // Zakonnost. — 2011. — № 6. — S. 53–57.
10. Pilnacek S. Ein Jahr StPO-Reform — Erwartungen, Realität und Zukunft // ÖJZ. — 2009. — № 62. — S. 550–554.
11.
Supplementary files
Review
For citations:
Kornakova S.V. The Power of Prosecutors in the Field of Criminal Proceedings in Russia and Abroad. Actual Problems of Russian Law. 2025;20(3):149-155. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17803/1994-1471.2025.172.3.149-155