Referendum as one of the Forms of Realizing the Right of Peoples to Self-Determination

The paper is devoted to the analysis of the approaches of various states and international consultative and advisory bodies to holding referendums on the self-determination of the people. It has been revealed that the right to self-determination can be based not only on ethnicity, but also on other characteristics, including common historical heritage, ethnic unity and language of communication. With regard to self-determination in the form of secession, the importance of establishing the boundaries of secession is noted, historical examples of referendums in various parts of the world and their consequences are examined. There are five historically established features that can be considered as a reflection of the legitimacy of the ongoing referendum on self-determination: connection with historical background, defining the boundaries of the referendum, ensuring fundamental democratic rights, establishing a legal framework and limiting external interference or pressure on referendum participants. These elements together create the conditions for obtaining legitimate results of the referendum and its subsequent meaning from the point of view of law.

1. Akimov Yu. G. Kvebekskaya paradiplomatiya i pozitsiya federalnogo pravitelstva Kanady: ot konflikta k kompromissu // Vestnik SPbGU. — 2011. — Seriya 6. — Vyp. 4. — S. 48–55.

2. Andreeva G. N., Vereshchagin A. N., Starostina I. A. Dveri referenduma priotkryvayutsya? // Sravnitelnoe konstitutsionnoe obozrenie. — 2007. — № 2. –– S. 173–181.

3. Anisimov A. I. Referendum kak sposob realizatsii narodom prava na samoopredelenie // Pravo i politika. — 2018. — № 6. –– S. 8–14.

4. Blishchenko I. P., Doria Zh. Pretsedenty v mezhdunarodnom publichnom i chastnom prave. — M.: MNIMP, 1999.

5. Konsultativnoe zaklyuchenie Mezhdunarodnogo Suda OON «Zapadnaya Sakhara» ot 16 oktyabrya 1975 g. // Kratkoe izlozhenie resheniy, konsultativnykh zaklyucheniy i postanovleniy Mezhdunarodnogo Suda 1948–1991. — Nyu-York, 1993. — S. 125–128.

6. Markedonov S. Mezhdu formalno-pravovymi normami i realnoy politikoy: de-fakto gosudarstva v sovremennykh mezhdunarodnykh protsessakh // Mezhdunarodnaya analitika. — 2022. — № 13 (4). — S. 7–10.

7. Moshnyaga V. P. Yazyk, etnonatsionalnaya identichnost i uprochenie nezavisimoy gosudarstvennosti // Problemy politicheskogo analiza. — Kishinev, 1995.

8. Naumkin V. V. Gluboko razdelennye obshchestva Blizhnego i Srednego Vostoka: konfliktnost, nasilie, vneshnee vmeshatelstvo // Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Seriya 25, Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya i mirovaya politika. — 2015. — № 1. –– S. 66–96.

9. Nikolaev D. G. Fenomen nepriznannykh gosudarstv v mirovoy politike // Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Seriya 25, Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya i mirovaya politika. — 2010. — № 1. — S. 27–41.

10. Ponomarenko A. N. Konstitutsionnye i nadnatsionalnye standarty v sfere referenduma i pravo narodov na samoopredelenie // Zakon i pravo. — 2019. — № 5. — S. 57–60.

11. Ponomarenko A. N. Referendum o samoopredelenii v sovremennoy konstitutsionno-pravovoy praktike: avtoref. dis. … kand. yurid. nauk. — M., 2021.

12. Shushkanov P. A. O nekotorykh problemakh prinyatiya v sostav Rossiyskoy Federatsii inostrannogo gosudarstva ili ego chasti // Pravo i politika. — 2007. — № 8. — S. 27–60.

13. Aznar M. The Human Factor in Territorial Disputes // Kohen M., Hébié M. Research Handbook on Territorial Disputes in International Law. — Edward Elgar Publishing, 2018.

14. Degli Esposti N. The 2017 independence referendum and the political economy of Kurdish nationalism in Iraq // Third World Quarterly. — 2021. — Vol. 42 (10). — P. 2317–2333.

15. Events in East Pakistan, 1971: a legal study // International Commission of Jurists. ICJ. — Geneva, 1972.

16. Ewin R. E. Peoples and Political Obligation // Macquarie Law Journal. — 2003. — Vol. 3. — P. 13–28.

17. Griffiths M. Self-Determination. International Society and World Order // Macquarie Law Journal. — 2003. — Vol. 3. –– P. 29–49.

18. Gross-Espiel H. The Right to self-determination; implementation of United Nations resolutions. — New York: United Nations, 1980.

19. Hama H. H. Article 140 Between Baghdad and KRG: The Future of Kirkuk Status in Post 16 October // India Quarterly. — Vol. 75 (4). — P. 510–524.

20. Scharf M. P. Earned Sovereignty: Juridical Underpinnings // Denver Journal of International Law and Policy. — 2003. — No. 31. — P. 373–385.

21. Shaw M. N. International law. — 6th ed. — Cambridge University Press, 2008.