Ensuring Intellectual Rights Protection in the context of Advanced Technologies Development

The paper is devoted to the issues related to the observance of the rights of authors and copyright holders in the creation and development of advanced technologies. The paper concludes that the use of objects of copyright and related rights, topologies of integrated circuits in the training of artificial intelligence technologies is an unnamed way of using the corresponding objects. It is established that the use of these objects in a similar way without the consent of the copyright holders should be recognized as a violation of exclusive rights. In addition, it is proved that the use of information about protected objects of patent law in the training of artificial intelligence algorithms is not a violation of patent rights from the point of view of current legislation. The conclusion is formulated about the need to consolidate mechanisms to ensure the rights of authors and copyright holders of results of intellectual work used in the creation and development of advanced technologies. Similar mechanisms are proposed by the author. It is proved that in the absence of such mechanisms as technology develops, a situation may arise when ensuring the rights of developers of advanced technologies will be carried out to the detriment of respect for the rights and legitimate interests of authors and copyright holders.

1. Balashova A. I. Pravovoy rezhim rezultatov deyatelnosti iskusstvennogo intellekta: edinstvo i differentsiatsiya podkhodov // Zhurnal Suda po intellektualnym pravam. — 2023. — Vyp. 3 (41). — S. 190–206.

2. Budylin S. L. Delo ob izobretatelnoy mashine, ili Okhranyayutsya li rezultaty intellektualnoy deyatelnosti iskusstvennogo intellekta? Kommentariy k resheniyu Apellyatsionnogo suda Anglii i Uelsa ot 21.09.2021 po delu Thaler v. Comptroller General of Patents Trade Marks and Designs (2021) EWCA Civ. 1374 // Vestnik ekonomicheskogo pravosudiya Rossiyskoy Federatsii. — 2022. — № 5. — S. 86–105.

3. Domovskaya E. V. Gosudarstvennye reestry prav na obekty promyshlennoy sobstvennosti: pravoprimenitelnye aspekty // Rossiyskiy sudya. — 2019. — № 4. — S. 61–64.

4. Zuykov S. A. O probleme obucheniya generativnykh neyrosetey na obektakh, okhranyaemykh avtorskim pravom // URL: http://ipcmagazine.ru/re-views/on-the-problem-training-generative-neural-networksobjects-protected-by-copyright (data obrashcheniya: 31.05.2024).

5. Shcherbak N. V. Digital art v usloviyakh elektronnoy kommertsii // Intellektualnaya sobstvennost. Avtorskoe pravo i smezhnye prava. — 2022. — № 7. — S. 43–61.