Motives and Purposes of Crime and their Multiple Meaning
https://doi.org/10.17803/1994-1471.2025.173.4.099-111
Abstract
All intentional crimes are committed either for certain motives or to achieve a certain goal. Indeed, identifying such motives and goals during the investigation of any criminal case initiated based on the fact of the commission of a deliberate crime is of great practical importance. Thus, it makes it possible, firstly, to establish the presence or absence of elements of a particular crime; secondly, to distinguish one crime from another; thirdly, to recognize the act as insignificant; fourthly, to assign a fair punishment to the guilty party, taking into account the circumstances mitigating and aggravating them, related to the motives and goals of the crime; fifthly, to assign a more lenient punishment than that provided for the given crime; sixthly, to determine the reasons for the commission of the crime and to characterize the personality of the person who committed it. Having grouped all the motives and goals of the crime, the author identifies and describes the following types: 1) those that influence their classification; 2) those that eliminate the social danger of the act; 3) those that are taken into account when assigning punishment; 4) those that characterize the reasons for committing the crime, as well as the personality of the person who committed it. In addition, some problematic issues of legislative and law enforcement nature are raised, namely, on legislator’s blurring of the boundaries between the motive and purpose of the crime; on the incorrect application by the courts of Article 64 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation in terms of taking into account as exceptional circumstances those that are related to the purposes and motives of the crime.
About the Author
V. E. KosyginRussian Federation
Vsevolod E. Kosygin, Cand. Sci. (Law), Deputy Head of the Department of Criminal Law
Moscow
References
1. Volkov B. S. Motiv i tsel prestupleniya po sovetskomu ugolovnomu pravu: dis. … d-ra yurid. nauk: 12.00.00. — Kazan, 1969. — 619 s.
2. Garbatovich D. A. Kvalifikatsiya ugolovno-pravovykh deyaniy po subektivnoy storone: dis. … kand. yurid. nauk: 12.00.08. — Chelyabinsk, 2004. — 208 s.
3. Dagel P. S. Kriminologicheskoe znachenie subektivnoy storony prestupleniya // Sotsialisticheskaya zakonnost. — 1966. — № 11. — S. 85–89.
4. Dagel P. S. Ugolovno-pravovoe znachenie motiva i tseli prestupleniya // Sotsialisticheskaya zakonnost. — 1969. — № 5. — S. 41–45.
5. Dagel P. S., Kotov D. P. Subektivnaya storona prestupleniya i ee ustanovlenie / nauch. red. G. F. Gorskiy. — Voronezh: Izd-vo Voronezhskogo universiteta, 1974. — 243 s.
6. Dremova N. A. Motiv i tsel v prestupleniyakh nesovershennoletnikh: ugolovno-pravovoe i kriminologicheskoe issledovanie: dis. … kand. yurid. nauk: 12.00.00. — M., 1972. — 332 s.
7. Zvecharovskiy I. E. Ugolovnoe pravo Rossii: kurs Obshchey chasti, vo mnogom opredelyayushchey deystvennost polozheniy ego chasti Osobennoy: uchebnik. — M.: Prospekt, 2024. — 480 s.
8. Kosygin V. E. Spetsialnye vidy sluzhebnogo podkupa v ugolovnom zakonodatelstve Rossii: dis. … kand. yurid. nauk: 5.1.4. — M., 2023. — 197 s.
9. Kosygin V. E. Ugolovnaya otvetstvennost za podkup arbitra (treteyskogo sudi): kriticheskiy analiz // Aktual’nye problemy rossijskogo prava. — 2022. — T. 17. — № 7 (140). — S. 109–120.
10. Kotov D. P. Motivy prestupleniy i ikh dokazyvanie (voprosy teorii i praktiki). — Voronezh: Izd-vo Voronezhskogo universiteta, 1975. — 152 s.
11. Kotov D. P. Motivy prestupleniy i ikh dokazyvanie sledovatelem: dis. … kand. yurid. nauk: 12.00.00. — Voronezh, 1972. — 295 s.
12. Kotov D. P. Tsel i tselepolaganie v neostorozhnykh prestupleniyakh // Problemy borby s prestupnostyu v usloviyakh nauchno-tekhnicheskoy revolyutsii: tematicheskiy sbornik. — T. 175. — Vladivostok, 1976. — S. 40–46.
13. Kochoi S. M. Otvetstvennost za korystnye prestupleniya protiv sobstvennosti po zakonodatelstvu Rossii: dis. … d-ra yurid. nauk: 12.00.08. — M., 1999. — 343 s.
14. Maslova E. V. Fakultativnye priznaki subektivnoy storony sostava prestupleniya: teoretiko-prikladnoe issledovanie: dis. … kand. yurid. nauk: 12.00.08. — N. Novgorod, 2017. — 300 s.
15. Melkonyan Kh. G. Problema kriminologicheskogo issledovaniya motivov i tseley prestupnogo povedeniya // Lichnost prestupnika i ugolovnaya otvetstvennost. — Saratov: Izd-vo Saratovskogo universiteta, 1981. — S. 53–63.
16. Orlov V. S. Vina i motiv v prestupleniyakh nesovershennoletnikh // Vestnik MGU. Pravo. — 1968. — № 1. — S. 28–34.
17. Petelin B. Ya. Motivy i tseli soversheniya prestupleniya // Sotsialisticheskaya zakonnost. — 1968. — № 10. — S. 40–44.
18. Rarog A. I. Vina v sovetskom ugolovnom prave: monografiya / nauch. red. B. V. Zdravomyslov. — M.: Prospekt, 2022. — 192 s.
19. Satushiev A. Kh. Printsip subektivnogo vmeneniya v konstruirovanii ugolovno-pravovykh norm: dis. … kand. yurid. nauk: 12.00.08. — Rostov n/D, 2008. — 213 s.
20. Sidakova T. M., Karaeva L. Kh. Motiv i tsel kak priznaki subektivnoy storony prestupleniya // Vestnik magistratury. — 2019. — № 5 5 (92). — S. 73–76.
21. Sklyarov S. V. Vina i motivy prestupnogo povedeniya kak osnovanie differentsiatsii i individualizatsii ugolovnoy otvetstvennosti: avtoref. dis. … d-ra yurid. nauk: 12.00.08. — M., 2004. — 45 s.
22. Struchkov N. A. Ustanovlenie sudom subektivnoy storony sostava prestupleniya // Sovetskaya yustitsiya. — 1963. — № 20. — S. 11–13.
23. Tararukhin S. A. Ustanovlenie motiva i kvalifikatsiya prestupleniy. — Kiev, 1977. — 151 s.
24. Ugolovnoe pravo Rossiyskoy Federatsii. Obshchaya chast: uchebnik dlya vuzov / pod red. V. S. Komissarova, N. E. Krylovoy, I. M. Tyazhkovoy. — M.: Statut, 2012. — 879 s.
25. Ugolovnoe pravo Rossiyskoy Federatsii. Obshchaya chast: uchebnik / pod red. I. E. Zvecharovskogo. — M.: Prospekt, 2023. — 584 s.
26. Feldshteyn G. S. Priroda umysla. — M.: T-vo tip. A. I. Mamontova, 1898. — 22 s.
27. Feldshteyn G. S. Uchenie o formakh vinovnosti v ugolovnom prave. — M.: Tip. T-va V. Chicherina v Moskve, 1902. — XII. — 571 s.
Review
For citations:
Kosygin V.E. Motives and Purposes of Crime and their Multiple Meaning. Actual Problems of Russian Law. 2025;20(4):99-111. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17803/1994-1471.2025.173.4.099-111