Preview

Actual Problems of Russian Law

Advanced search

Controversial Aspects of Legal Consciousness in the light of the Problems of Implementation of the Right to Health Protection

https://doi.org/10.17803/1994-1471.2025.170.1.026-037

Abstract

The paper examines problematic aspects of implementation of the right to health protection and medical care in the context of the development of ideas about a right as a regulator of behavior based on the responsibility of the copyright holder for independent choice. It is noted that health protection as one of the main human values attracts the increased attention of all participants involved in the process. It is characterized by a high level of conflict and, therefore, it requires the use of the most advanced legal technologies for a fair and effective regulation of the relations under consideration. A very sensitive and priority area of interests of every citizen is affected from the standpoint of the effectiveness of the protective properties of the right construction. Using the decisions of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation, the author proves the limited possibilities of detecting violations of the patient’s rights while ignoring the differences between a right and a law. The paper substantiates the need to correct ideas about the right, identifying it with the mechanism of legislative implementation. The author consolidates new knowledge necessary for the development of theoretical aspects of the interaction between the right and the law in the direction of strengthening the potential of the subjective right as a tool for regulating relations in conditions of objective limitations of the legislative form. The author concludes that the prospects for strengthening the legal space in which the level of protection of subjective rights in the field of health protection correlate with the ability of legal regulations to provide rights holders with the opportunity to freely and responsibly choose a trajectory of behavior that does not exclude (gives a chance) to increase the level of quality indicators of medical care.

About the Author

S. V. Vasilyev
Pskov State University
Russian Federation

Sergei V. Vasilyev, Dr. Sci. (Law), Professor, Head of the Department of State Law Disciplines and Theory of Law

Pskov



References

1. Budaev A. M. Realizatsiya prava na okhranu zdorovya grazhdan na mestnom urovne: teoriya, praktika, kontrol // Aktual’nye problemy rossijskogo prava. — 2022. — № 10. — S. 64–71.

2. Dondokov A. I. Doktrina Loss of Chance v angliyskom prave // Zakon. — 2013. — № 7. — S. 150–155.

3. Igoshkina M. E. Primenenie tsifrovykh tekhnologiy pri realizatsii prava na okhranu zdorovya i meditsinskuyu pomoshch: problemy i perspektivy vnedreniya // Gosudarstvennaya vlast i mestnoe samoupravlenie. — 2023. — № 6. — S. 45–47.

4. Kolesnichenko O. V. Utrata shansa v sfere zashchity prava na zdorove: novyy dokazatelstvennyy standart ili deliktnaya poterya? // Arbitrazhnyy i grazhdanskiy protsess. — 2023. — № 9. — S. 36–40.

5. Korol L. N., Shkolyarenko E. A. Pravovye aspekty realizatsii konstitutsionnogo prava grazhdan na okhranu zdorovya i meditsinskuyu pomoshch v Rossiyskoy Federatsii v usloviyakh modernizatsii zdravookhraneniya // Sotsialnoe i pensionnoe pravo. — 2020. — № 2. — S. 23–28.

6. Mokhov A. A., Seleznev G. I. Institut Upolnomochennogo po zashchite prav v sfere okhrany zdorovya grazhdan // Yurist. — 2020. — № 10. — S. 68–74.

7. Skovorodko A. V. Iskusstvennyy intellekt v normotvorcheskom protsesse v sfere realizatsii veteranami Vooruzhennykh Sil Rossiyskoy Federatsii, postradavshimi pri vypolnenii voinskogo dolga, i chlenov ikh semey konstitutsionnogo prava na okhranu zdorovya // Pravo v Vooruzhennykh Silakh. — 2019. — № 7. — S. 28–37.

8. Sobolev S. I. Preparirovanie instituta subsidiarnoy otvetstvennosti pri administrativnoy likvidatsii dolzhnika // Vestnik ekonomicheskogo pravosudiya Rossiyskoy Federatsii. — 2021. — № 6. — S. 27–73.

9. Sokolova M. A. K voprosu o bazovoy terminologii Federalnogo zakona № 323-FZ «Ob osnovakh okhrany zdorovya grazhdan v RF» // Meditsinskoe pravo. — 2023. — № 4. — S. 27–31.

10. Timofeev I. V. Dostupnost i neobkhodimost (pokazannost) meditsinskoy pomoshchi: konstitutsionno-pravovoe soderzhanie ponyatiy // Konstitutsionnoe i munitsipalnoe pravo. — 2018. — № 6. — S. 20–25.

11. Ukraintseva V. S. K voprosu o sovershenstvovanii Federalnogo zakona «Ob alternativnoy grazhdanskoy sluzhbe» // URL: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/k-voprosu-o-sovershenstvovanii-federalnogo-zakona-obalternativnoy-grazhdanskoy-sluzhbe (data obrashcheniya: 18.05.2024).

12. Shakirova E. Kompensatsii patsientam i ikh rodstvennikam posle operatsiy — analiz sporov // Zhilishchnoe pravo. — 2023. — № 12. — S. 105–112.

13. Yurev S. S., Korotkova P. E. Pravo na okhranu zdorovya i domashniy arest: problemy regulirovaniya i pravoprimeneniya // Advokatskaya praktika. — 2021. — № 5. — S. 7–12.


Review

For citations:


Vasilyev S.V. Controversial Aspects of Legal Consciousness in the light of the Problems of Implementation of the Right to Health Protection. Actual Problems of Russian Law. 2025;20(1):26-37. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17803/1994-1471.2025.170.1.026-037

Views: 100


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1994-1471 (Print)
ISSN 2782-1862 (Online)