Rules of Adversarial Proceedings in Arbitration Formed Through Judicial Application
https://doi.org/10.17803/1994-1471.2025.176.7.094-103
Abstract
The paper examines judicial practice regarding the implementation of the adversarial principle in arbitration proceedings. The study identifies stages in the development of adversarial proceedings, driven by the dynamics of socio-economic relations, the convergence of legal systems, the search for approaches and methods to enhance judicial efficiency, and shifts in procedural paradigms. It is established that, as a result of judicial application, rules of adversarial proceedings have been formed based on facilitating justice, the good-faith disclosure of truthful information, and the presentation of evidence relevant to the case. Courts have defined exceptions to the general rule of burden of proof distribution — inequality in procedural opportunities for proving and bad-faith procedural conduct, including the withholding of information, failure to present evidence, or refusal to provide explanations. The burden of proof no longer follows unconditionally the burden of assertion: in conditions of inequality of procedural powers of proof, the burden of proof is placed on the party that has or should have the evidence. Such approaches are justified and align with the objectives of the proceedings. At the same time, the principle of legal certainty requires integrating these developed rules into the civil procedural framework, as well as their further elaboration and specification.
About the Author
E. N. LukashevichRussian Federation
Ekaterina N. Lukashevich, Head of the Legal Department; Postgraduate Student, Department of Civil Law and Procedure
Chelyabinsk
References
1. Abolonin V. O. O razvitii grazhdanskogo protsessa cherez smenu osnovnoy paradigmy // Arbitrazhnyy i grazhdanskiy protsess. — 2012. — № 11–12.
2. Alieskerov M. A. Razvitie sostyazatelnogo grazhdanskogo protsessa: zarubezhnaya praktika i rossiyskiy opyt // Zhurnal rossiyskogo prava. — 2021. — № 10.
3. Afanasev S. F. O prave na lozh v tsivilisticheskom protsesse i sposobakh ego nivelirovaniya (v tom chisle s uchetom elektronnykh tekhnologiy) // Yurist. — 2020. — № 1.
4. Budylin S. L. Vnutrennee ubezhdenie ili balans veroyatnostey? Standarty dokazyvaniya v Rossii i za rubezhom // Vestnik Vysshego Arbitrazhnogo Suda RF. — 2014. — № 4.
5. Budylin S. L. Rentgenovskiy luch prava. Raskrytie dokazatelstv v Rossii i za rubezhom // Vestnik Vysshego Arbitrazhnogo Suda RF. — 2014. — № 7.
6. Bortnikova N. A. Dokazyvanie v sudebnom protsesse // SPS «KonsultantPlyus». — 2024.
7. Grazhdanskoe pravo. Aktualnye problemy teorii i praktiki: v 2 t. T. 1 / V. A. Belov [i dr.]; otv. red. V. A. Belov. — 2-e izd., ster. — M.: Yurayt, 2024. — 484 s.
8. Dyakonova M. O. Garmonizatsiya norm o raspredelenii bremeni dokazyvaniya na primere Tipovykh evropeyskikh pravil grazhdanskogo protsessa // Zhurnal rossiyskogo prava. — 2021. — № 7.
9. Zhukov A. A. Pravovye sredstva vozdeystviya suda na protsessualnoe povedenie storon v grazhdanskom sudoproizvodstve: dis. … kand. yurid. nauk. — M., 2022. — 193 s.
10. Larents K., Kanaris K.-V. Metodologiya yurisprudentsii / per. s nem. K. V. Nama. — M.: M-Logos, 2024. — 357 s.
11. Kurochkin S. A. Sudebnye reformy i effektivnost pravosudiya // Vestnik grazhdanskogo protsessa. — 2023. — № 4.
12. Kurs dokazatelstvennogo prava: Grazhdanskiy protsess. Arbitrazhnyy protsess. Administrativnoe sudoproizvodstvo / S. F. Afanasev, O. V. Baulin, I. N. Lukyanova [i dr.]; pod red. M. A. Fokinoy. — 2-e izd., pererab. i dop. — M.: Statut, 2019. — 656 s.
13. Maleshin D. Ya. Grazhdanskaya protsessualnaya sistema Rossii. — M.: Statut, 2011. — 496 s.
14. Peremena lits v obyazatelstve i otvetstvennost za narushenie obyazatelstva: kommentariy k statyam 330–333, 380–381, 382–406.1 Grazhdanskogo kodeksa Rossiyskoy Federatsii / A. G. Arkhipova, V. V. Baybak, S. A. Gromov [i dr.]; otv. red. A. G. Karapetov. — M.: M-Logos, 2022. — 1582 s.
15. Popov B. V. Raspredelenie dokazatelstv mezhdu storonami v grazhdanskom protsesse. — Kharkov, 1905. — 379 s.
16. Shevchenko I. M. O nekotorykh voprosakh raskrytiya dokazatelstv v delakh o bankrotstve // Arbitrazhnye spory. — 2020. — № 3.
17. Ryazanovskiy V. A. Edinstvo protsessa: ucheb. posobie. — M.: Gorodets, 2005. — 80 s.
18. Yablochkov T. M. K ucheniyu ob osnovnykh printsipakh grazhdanskogo protsessa. — M., 1914.
Review
For citations:
Lukashevich E.N. Rules of Adversarial Proceedings in Arbitration Formed Through Judicial Application. Actual Problems of Russian Law. 2025;20(7):94-103. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17803/1994-1471.2025.176.7.094-103