The Importance of SMART Standardization as an Advanced Technology in Legal Support of Industrial Production Quality
https://doi.org/10.17803/1994-1471.2025.176.7.104-113
Abstract
The paper examines the legal aspects of SMART standardization in industrial production. SMART standardization is considered as a new advanced digital technology in the field of standardization. The study reveals the underdeveloped conceptual framework in legislation concerning the use of advanced technologies in general. This deficiency reduces the effectiveness of legal norms and, to some extent, limits the capabilities of economic entities. It is shown that SMART standardization involves the development of a special class of standards — machinereadable (SMART) standards. Conclusions are drawn regarding the legal nature of such standards. It is noted that machine-readable (SMART) standards mark the transition from document-oriented content to machine-processable data. Consequently, the emergence of such standards determines a fundamental shift in their application, and implies a significant reduction in the risk of human error in production. Attention is given to legal issues related to the use of machine-readable (SMART) standards. It is shown that machine-readable (SMART) standards should be classified as elements of machine-readable law. A conclusion is made about the need to clarify the patent legal policy in the field of standardization, where machine-readable (SMART) standards could become one of its components.
Keywords
SMART standardization,
advanced technologies,
digital technologies,
legal support,
industrial production,
machine-readable (SMART) standards,
legal nature of machine-readable (SMART) standards,
digital maturity of the standard,
International Organization for Standardization,
International Electrotechnical Commission,
semantic compatibility of computer systems,
machine-readable law,
Concept for the Development of Machine-Readable Law Technologies,
patent legal policy,
objects of patent law,
patents essential to standards
Supporting agencies: The study was carried out within the framework of «Priority-2030» Strategic Academic Leadership Program («Business Law» Competence Center).
About the Author
A. S. Panova
Kutafin Moscow State Law University (MSAL)
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Albina S. Panova, Dr. Sci. (Law), Associate Professor, Professor, Department of Business and Corporate Law
Moscow
References
1. Aktualnye problemy predprinimatelskogo prava: uchebnik / otv. red. I. V. Ershova. — M.: Prospekt, 2021. — 448 s.
2. Vaypan V. A. Tsifrovoe pravo: istoki, ponyatie i mesto v pravovoy sisteme // Pravo i ekonomika. — 2024. — № 1. — S. 5–27.
3. Golovin S., Lotsmanov A., Tikhomirov S. Integrirovannaya platforma standartizatsii: informatsionnye tekhnologii // Standarty i kachestvo. — 2023. — № 9. — S. 60–65.
4. Gyulbasarova E. V. Obespechenie okhrany intellektualnykh prav v usloviyakh razvitiya peredovykh tekhnologiy // Aktual’nye problemy rossijskogo prava. — 2024. — T. 19. — № 10. — S. 81–89.
5. Denisova O. A., Dmitrieva S. Yu. Standart na SMART-standart: dokument v detalyakh // Standarty i kachestvo. — 2023. — № 10. — S. 44–48.
6. Dmitrieva S. Osnovnye printsipy razrabotki umnykh (SMART) standartov // Standarty i kachestvo. — 2021. — № 12. — S. 22–25.
7. Dmitrieva S., Kubishin O., Samotugo I. «Umnye (SMART) standarty. Arkhitektura i formaty dannykh»: standart v detalyakh // Standarty i kachestvo. — 2025. — № 1. — S. 46–49.
8. Dmitrieva S. Yu., Nikolaev A. F., Georgieva A. A. SMART-standarty: tsifrovoy instrument avtomatizatsii upravleniya // Metody menedzhmenta kachestva. — 2024. — № 9. — S. 16–21.
9. Kolmykov E. A., Vorontsova Yu. V., Vorontsova A. N. Predlozheniya po strukture postroeniya i identifikatsii soderzhaniya pri perekhode k SMART-standartam // Standarty i kachestvo. — 2022. — № 6. — S. 42–45.
10. Leonidov K., Aronov I., Rybakova A. Standarty, osnovannye na patentakh // Standarty i kachestvo. — 2022. — № 4. — S. 14–19.
11. Maslov D. E. Yuridicheskaya rekomendatsiya: teoriya, praktika, tekhnika: dis. … kand. yurid. nauk. — N. Novgorod, 2013. — 273 s.
12. Panova A. S. Pravovoe obespechenie kachestva i bezopasnosti tovarov: voprosy teorii i praktiki. — M.: Prospekt, 2020. — 336 s.
13. Perevozkin A. A. Teoretiko-pravovaya kharakteristika mashinochitaemogo prava // Aktual’nye problemy rossijskogo prava. — 2024. — № 8. — S. 22–37.
14. Prokopov M. S. O ponyatii «tsifrovye tekhnologii nadzora za bezopasnostyu dorozhnogo dvizheniya» // Administrativnoe pravo i protsess. — 2022. — № 8. — S. 79–81.
15. Salamatov V., Vatolkina N., Drobyshev D., Sapozhnikova P. Tsifrovaya transformatsiya standartizatsii: prepyatstviya i vyzovy // Standarty i kachestvo. — 2023. — № 4. — S. 34–39.
16. Salamatov V., Vatolkina N., Drobyshev D., Sapozhnikova P. Tsifrovaya transformatsiya v sfere standartizatsii dlya povysheniya mezhdunarodnoy konkurentosposobnosti Rossii // Rossiyskiy vneshneekonomicheskiy vestnik. — 2023. — № 6. — S. 7–29.
17. Soltsin L. O. Tsifrovye tekhnologii: ponyatie, vidy // SPS «KonsultantPlyus». — 2024.
18. Taksior O., Polikarpov M. Peredovye tekhnologii v inspektsionnoy deyatelnosti // Standarty i kachestvo. — 2021. — № 3. — S. 102–107.
19. Tsifrovoe pravo: uchebnik / pod obshch. red. V. V. Blazheeva, M. A. Egorovoy. — M.: Prospekt, 2020. — 640 s.
Review
For citations:
Panova A.S. The Importance of SMART Standardization as an Advanced Technology in Legal Support of Industrial Production Quality. Actual Problems of Russian Law. 2025;20(7):104-113. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17803/1994-1471.2025.176.7.104-113
Views:
16
Email this article 