Scientific Tools for Administrative-Law Research on Disciplinary Proceedings
https://doi.org/10.17803/1994-1471.2025.179.10.071-085
Abstract
In Russian scholarship on administrative procedural law, there is no consensus regarding the legal nature of activities related to the imposition of disciplinary sanctions on civil servants for breaches of official discipline, corrupt practices, and acts damaging to official integrity. Alongside views that exclude disciplinary proceedings from the structure of the administrative process, certain scholars classify such proceedings as service-delict disciplinary procedures or administrative-disciplinary procedures. These positions fail to consider the legal nature of the relationships that form part of the subject matter of administrative law in the application of disciplinary sanctions to civil servants; the specific method of administrative regulation, which ensures the performance of duties or compliance with prohibitions in areas of external-authority activities or intra-organizational relations; as well as the procedural category of an individually-defined case and the procedural form for its consideration and resolution. From the standpoint of defining the content and structure of administrative-procedural activities of executive authorities, introducing new procedural categories and concepts without sufficient justification risks undermining the substantive unity of the administrative process. This circumstance necessitates a unified approach to the study of administrative-procedural forms employed by executive authorities. As a methodological framework, the propositions of V. D. Sorokin’s concept of the administrative process may be utilized. These involve the elements of a unified method of legal regulation (at the level of the legal system), the types of regulation derived from these elements, and their channels of implementation, represented by corresponding forms of legal process. On this basis, disciplinary proceedings may be characterized as a channel for implementing two types of legal regulation, founded on prescriptions and prohibitions as direct regulators of social relations. Consequently, disciplinary proceedings constitute a procedural form of law-enforcement (jurisdictional) activity exercised by disciplinary authorities in imposing sanctions, analogous in typology to the procedural form of criminal proceedings.
About the Author
E. L. LeshchinaRussian Federation
Eduard L. Leshchina, Cand. Sci. (Law), Associate Professor, Department of Theory of the State and Law, Constitutional and Administrative Law
Chelyabinsk
References
1. Administrativnoe pravo Rossiyskoy Federatsii: uchebnik dlya bakalavrov / pod red. A. Yu. Sokolova. — 2‑e izd. — M.: Norma, 2018. — 352 s.
2. Administrativnoe pravo Rossiyskoy Federatsii: uchebnik / Yu. I. Migachev, L. L. Popov, S. V. Tikhomirov; pod red. L. L. Popova. — 5‑e izd., pererab. i dop. — M.: Yurayt, 2023. — 456 s.
3. Administrativno-protsessualnoe pravo: uchebnik / pod red. A. I. Kaplunova. — 3‑e izd., pererab. i dop. — SPb.: Izd-vo SPb. un-ta MVD Rossii, 2022. — 356 s.
4. Administrativno-protsessualnoe pravo: uchebnik / pod red. A. I. Kaplunova. — 2‑e izd., pererab. i dop. — SPb.: R-Kopi, 2017. — 376 s.
5. Administrativnyy protsess Rossiyskoy Federatsii: uchebnik / pod red. L. L. Popova. — M.: Prospekt, 2017. — 350 s.
6. Adushkin Yu. S. Teoreticheskie voprosy sovetskogo distsiplinarnogo proizvodstva: Administrativnoprotsessualnyy aspekt: avtoref. dis. … kand. yurid. nauk. — Odessa, 1979. — 14 s.
7. Bakhrakh D. N. Administrativnoe pravo Rossii: uchebnik. — M.: Eksmo, 2011. — 624 s.
8. Butov P. S. Sovershenstvovanie materialnykh i protsedurno-protsessualnykh norm o primenenii distsiplinarnoy otvetstvennosti rabotnikov po trudovomu pravu Rossiyskoy Federatsii: avtoref. dis. … kand. yurid. nauk. — Tomsk, 2006. — 29 s.
9. Galagan I. A. Administrativnaya otvetstvennost v SSSR. Protsessualnoe regulirovanie. — Voronezh: Izd-vo Voronezh. un-ta, 1976. — 198 s.
10. Grishkovets A. A. Sootnoshenie administrativnogo i distsiplinarnogo prinuzhdeniya na sluzhbe v organakh vnutrennikh del // Sovremennoe pravo. — 2024. — № 11. — S. 22–33.
11. Dobrobaba M. B. Distsiplinarnaya otvetstvennost v sluzhebno-deliktnom prave: ponyatie i pravovaya priroda // Aktual’nye problemy rossijskogo prava. — 2013. — № 6 (31). — S. 689–697.
12. Dobrobaba M. B. Distsiplinarnaya otvetstvennost: pravovye mekhanizmy obespecheniya effektivnosti v sisteme gosudarstvennoy sluzhby: monografiya / M. B. Dobrobaba, M. V. Presnyakov, S. E. Channov. — M.: Norma, 2023. — 352 s.
13. Dobrobaba M. B. Sluzhebno-deliktnoe distsiplinarnoe proizvodstvo v administrativnom protsesse // Vestnik Universiteta imeni O.Е. Kutafina (MGYuA). — 2015. — № 8. — S. 177–184.
14. Dobrobaba M. B. Sluzhebnoe deliktnoe pravo kak kompleksnyy pravovoy institut administrativnogo prava // Vestnik VGU. Seriya «Pravo». — 2013. — № 1. — S. 252–264.
15. Zubarev S. M. Ponyatie i pravovaya priroda distsiplinarnogo proizvodstva // Administrativnyy protsess v Rossiyskoy Federatsii: uchebnik / otv. red. L. L. Popov. — M.: Prospekt, 2021. — 352 s.
16. Kaplunov A. I. Znachenie nauchnogo naslediya V. D. Sorokina dlya razvitiya teorii administrativnoprotsessualnogo prava kak samostoyatelnoy otrasli rossiyskogo prava // Administrativnoe pravo i protsess. — 2024. — № 6. — S. 11–15.
17. Kaplunov A. I. O pravovoy prirode i klassifikatsii administrativno-protsessualnykh form deyatelnosti organov ispolnitelnoy vlasti // Pravovaya politika i pravovaya kultura. — 2022. — № 2. — S. 52–57.
18. Kaplunov A. I. Razvitie teorii administrativnogo protsessa kak uslovie sovershenstvovaniya normativnoy osnovy administrativno-protsessualnoy deyatelnosti // Ugolovno-ispolnitelnoe pravo. — 2017. — T. 12 (1–4). — № 4. — S. 490–497.
19. Kaplunov A. I. Sovremennye podkhody k ponimaniyu administrativnogo protsessa kak rezultat i osnova razvitiya otechestvennogo administrativno-protsessualnogo zakonodatelstva // Sibirskoe yuridicheskoe obozrenie. — 2021. — T. 18. — № 3. — S. 261–276.
20. Leshchina E. L. Distsiplinarnoe prinuzhdenie po administrativnomu pravu: ponyatie, priznaki, struktura // Vestnik Nizhegorodskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta imeni N.I. Lobachevskogo. — 2018. — № 1. — S. 87–95.
21. Leshchina E. L. Protsessualnaya forma proizvodstva po distsiplinarnym delam // Lex russica. — 2022. — T. 75. — № 1. — S. 38–47.
22. Obukhova G. N. Pravovaya protsedura privlecheniya rabotnika k otvetstvennosti za neispolnenie libo nenadlezhashchee ispolnenie svoikh trudovykh obyazannostey: dis. … kand. yurid. nauk. — Omsk, 2016. — 183 s.
23. Perederin S. V. Protsedurno-protsessualnye pravovye sredstva i sposoby obespecheniya trudovykh prav rabotnikov: avtoref. dis. … d-ra yurid. nauk. — M., 2001. — 52 s.
24. Protasov V. N. Osnovy obshchepravovoy protsessualnoy teorii. — M.: Yurid. lit., 1991. — 143 s.
25. Rogozhkina E. A. Proizvodstvo po distsiplinarnym delam kak forma realizatsii distsiplinarnoy otvetstvennosti gosudarstvennykh sluzhashchikh // Gosudarstvo i pravo. — 2017. — № 8. — S. 96–99.
26. Rogozhkina E. A., Kaplunov A. I. Proizvodstvo po distsiplinarnym delam v organakh vnutrennikh del Rossiyskoy Federatsii: monografiya. — SPb.: Izd-vo SPb. un-ta MVD Rossii, 2020. — 204 s.
27. Salishcheva N. G. Administrativnyy protsess: uchebnik dlya bakalavriata i magistratury / pod red. M. A. Shtatinoy. — M.: Yurayt, 2017. — 364 s.
28. Sorokin V. D. Administrativno-protsessualnoe pravo: uchebnik. — 2‑e izd., pererab. i dop. — SPb.: Yuridicheskiy tsentr Press, 2008. — 569 s.
29. Sorokin V. D. Voprosy teorii sovetskogo administrativno-protsessualnogo prava: dis. … d-ra yurid. nauk. — L., 1968. — 599 s.
30. Sorokin V. D. Izbrannye trudy. — SPb.: Yuridicheskiy tsentr Press, 2005. — 1084 s.
31. Sorokin V. D. Pravovoe regulirovanie: predmet, metod, protsess (makrouroven). — SPb.: Yuridicheskiy tsentr Press, 2003. — 661 s.
32. Spiridonov P. E. Sovremennye voprosy administrativno-distsiplinarnogo proizvodstva // Aktual’nye problemy rossijskogo prava. — 2018. — № 9 (94). — S. 102–109.
33. Starilov Yu. N. Administrativnoe sudoproizvodstvo i administrativnye protsedury: k sistemnomu vzaimodeystviyu i nadlezhashchemu urovnyu pravovoy reglamentatsii // Administrativnoe pravo i protsess. — 2018. — № 3. — S. 7–23.
34. Stakhov A. I., Kononov P. I. Ispolnitelnoe administrativno-protsessualnoe pravo: uchebnik. — M.: Yurayt, 2023. — 685 s.
35. Tereshchuk S. S. Distsiplinarnoe proizvodstvo po delam o korruptsionnykh pravonarusheniyakh na gosudarstvennoy sluzhbe: dis. … kand. yurid. nauk. — Saratov, 2024. — 201 s.
36. Trofimov E. V. Nagradnoe delo v Rossiyskoy Federatsii: administrativno-pravovoe issledovanie: dis. … d-ra yurid. nauk. — M., 2012. — 454 s.
37. Yuridicheskaya protsessualnaya forma: Teoriya i praktika / pod obshch. red. P. E. Nedbaylo i V. M. Gorsheneva. — M.: Yuridicheskaya literatura, 1976. — 278 s.
Review
For citations:
Leshchina E.L. Scientific Tools for Administrative-Law Research on Disciplinary Proceedings. Actual Problems of Russian Law. 2025;20(10):71-85. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17803/1994-1471.2025.179.10.071-085
JATS XML




















