Causation in Law as a Subject of Research
https://doi.org/10.17803/1994-1471.2025.181.12.125-134
Abstract
The paper examines law as an ideal object and an element of social consciousness, introduces the fiction of a reasonable and just legislator, and explores the socio-historical significance of criminal law. Russian legal theory and practice have not developed a generally accepted understanding of causation, which creates a risk of arbitrary and unjust application of the law. This problem can and should be solved within the framework of criminal policy. At the same time, it is necessary to ensure uniform application of the law at least in typical situations. Philosophical, scientific, and everyday understanding of causation should form the basis for understanding causation in law.
However, philosophical and natural scientific concepts of causation are insufficient for establishing causation in legal qualification. The theory of equivalence of conditions allows for the identification of minimal but insufficient signs of causation. The understanding of causation in law must correspond to reasonable criminal policy, taking into account the principle of economy of repression.
About the Author
I. A. KlepitskijRussian Federation
Ivan A. Klepitskij, Dr. Sci. (Law), Professor, Professor, Department of Criminal Law
Moscow
References
1. Igonina E. O. Prichinnaya svyaz v prestupleniyakh, sovershennykh meditsinskimi rabotnikami po neostorozhnosti: dis. … kand. yurid. nauk. — SPb., 2024. — 250 s.
2. Lokk Dzh. Dva traktata o pravlenii // Sochineniya v trekh tomakh. T. 3. — M., 1988. — S. 135–404.
3. Sergeevskiy N. D. O znachenii prichinnoy svyazi v ugolovnom prave. Ch. II. — Yaroslavl, 1880. — 178 s.
4. Soktoev Z. B. Prichinnost i obektivnaya storona prestupleniya. — M., 2024. — 272 s.
5. Burchard Ch. Criminal Law Exceptionalism as an Affirmative Ideology, and its Expansionist Discontents // Criminal Law and Philosophy. — 2023. April. — Vol. 17. — Iss. 1. — P. 17–27.
6. Burchard Ch., Duff A. Criminal Law Exceptionalism: Introduction // Criminal Law and Philosophy. — 2023. April. — Vol. 17. — Iss. 1. — P. 3–4.
7. Duff R. A., Marshall S. E. Is Criminal Law «Exceptional»? // Criminal Law and Philosophy. — 2023. April. — Vol. 17. — Iss. 1. — P. 39–48.
8. Hobbes Th. De Cive: Philosophical Rudiments Concerning Government and Society. — London, 1839. — 266 p.
9. Levin B. Criminal Law Exceptionalism // Virginia Law Review. — 2022. — Vol. 108. — P. 1381–1448.
10. Lorca R. Could We Live Together Without Punishment? On the Exceptional Status of the Criminal Law // Criminal Law and Philosophy. — 2023. April. — Vol. 17. — Iss. 1. — P. 29–38.
11. Reinach A. Über den Ursachenbegriff im geltenden Strafrecht. — Leipzig, 1905. — 71 S.
12. Ristroph A. An Intellectual History of Mass Incarceration // Boston College Law Review. — 2019. — Vol. 60. — P. 1949–2010.
13. Ristroph A. The Wages of Criminal Law Exceptionalism // Criminal Law and Philosophy. — 2023. April. — Vol. 17. — Iss. 1. — P. 5–15.
Review
For citations:
Klepitskij I.A. Causation in Law as a Subject of Research. Actual Problems of Russian Law. 2025;20(12):125-134. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17803/1994-1471.2025.181.12.125-134
JATS XML





















