Issues of Efficiency of Organizational and Administrative Functions and Powers of the Judicial Authority of the Russian Federation

The improvement of the organization of court proceedings is an urgent task for the development of the judicial system of the Russian Federation. The purpose of the study is to identify problems that impede the progressive development of court proceedings in the Russian Federation. The paper discloses the main regulatory, administrative, managerial and organizational reasons and circumstances that adversely affect the effectiveness of Russian legal proceedings. Against the background of these problems, the official burden on the judge’s office continues to grow. Many judges’ offices are not capable to fulfill official duties in a timely manner and in accordance with established internal regulations. Problematic issues of the powers of judges and excessive responsibility of court staff also negatively affect the development of legal proceedings in the Russian Federation, create conditions for high staff turnover in the judicial system. The paper justifies the need to eliminate the identified organizational problems of court proceedings. In conditions of decentralized office work, the powers of the judge’s office should be clearly regulated. In order to develop and improve the efficiency of the centralized records management system, it is proposed to establish a new position — a junior clerk of the court session.

1. Burdina E. V., Petukhov N. A. Sluzhebnaya nagruzka na sudey: problemy opredeleniya, otsenki, upravleniya: monografiya / pod red. V. V. Ershova. — M.: RGUP, 2017. — 236 s.

2. Voronov E. N. Upravlenie sudom (administrativno-pravovoe regulirovanie) // Rossiyskiy sudya. — 2012. — № 9. — S. 22–23.

3. Ershov V. V., Petukhov N. A., Burdina E. V. Sluzhebnaya nagruzka na sudey kak predmet nauchnogo analiza: teoreticheskie i metodologicheskie voprosy // Rossiyskoe pravosudie. — 2017. — № 6 (134). — S. 5–23.

4. Zueva I. V. Sudoproizvodstvo po delam o nesostoyatelnosti (bankrotstve) // Vestnik Arbitrazhnogo suda Zapadno-Sibirskogo okruga. — 2005. — № 2. — S. 35–45.

5. Neshataeva V. O., Bugrova S. S. K voprosu o regulirovanii nagruzki sudey // Rossiyskoe pravosudie. — 2017. — № 3 (131). — S. 35–48.

6. Sviridenko O. M. Materialno-pravovoe i protsessualnoe obosnovanie spetsializatsii bankrotnykh sudov // Pravo i ekonomika. — 2004. — № 7. — S. 38–40.

7. Soldatov V. A. Nezavisimost sudey arbitrazhnykh sudov v sisteme printsipov arbitrazhnogo pravosudiya // Arbitrazhnyy i grazhdanskiy protsess. — 2013. — № 1. — S. 12–15.

8. Starilov Yu. N. Kurs obshchego administrativnogo prava: v 3 t. T. 1. — M., 2002. — 711 s.

9. Frolov I. V. Upravlencheskie funktsii sudebnykh organov, ikh mesto v sisteme gosudarstvennogo (administrativnogo) upravleniya sfery finansovogo ozdorovleniya, nesostoyatelnosti (bankrotstva) // Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. — 2009. — № 324. — S. 253–256.

10. Shokumov Yu. Zh. Aktualnye voprosy razvitiya arbitrazhnogo sudoproizvodstva i protsessualnykh funktsiy suda v Rossii // Vestnik ekonomicheskoy bezopasnosti. — 2019. — № 2. — S. 193–199.

11. Yakovlev V. F. Opyt sozdaniya arbitrazhnykh sudov // Vestnik Vysshego Arbitrazhnogo Suda RF. — 2012. — № 1. — S. 6–25.