Preview

Actual Problems of Russian Law

Advanced search

Individual Legal Consciousness Formation in the Context of the Use of Virtual Gaming Assets

https://doi.org/10.17803/1994-1471.2026.189.8.040-047

Abstract

The paper examines the legal conceptualization of the use of virtual in‑game assets (VIAs). Such assets — including accounts, characters, weapons, equipment, cosmetic items, currency, and virtual real estate — possess substantial consumer value and may have both tangible and intangible value. Some of them may be converted into real‑world money. From a legal perspective, the defining characteristic of virtual in‑game assets is their economic value. It is noted that the legal dimension of the conversion process should be considered through the lens of internet users' responses to changes in the external environment arising from their interaction with one another and with that environment. Unlike other forms of virtual property, VIAs are inherently connected with online games and cannot exist independently thereof. The article draws attention to the fact that legal rules govern only a limited part of the relationships emerging online. The principal regulatory framework consists of user agreements and rules developed by the internet community itself on the basis of a multistakeholder approach. In view of the rapid development of virtual space and the emergence of metaverses, the article contends that it is appropriate to orient regulation towards moral norms, universal human values, and to use the potential of legal culture and legal consciousness.

About the Authors

O. A. Stepanov
Institute of Legislation and Comparative Law under the Government of the Russian Federation
Russian Federation

Oleg A. Stepanov - Dr. Sci. (Law), Professor, Principal Research Fellow, Centre for Judicial Law.

Moscow



M. M. Stepanov
Institute of Legislation and Comparative Law under the Government of the Russian Federation
Russian Federation

Mikhail M. Stepanov - Cand. Sci. (Law), Associate Professor, Leading Research Fellow, Department of Legal Theory and Interdisciplinary Studies of Legislation.

Moscow



References

1. Arshinov V. I., Budanov V. G. Setevye informatsionnye revolyutsii i bolshoy antropologicheskiy perekhod: evolyutsionnyy aspekt // Slozhnost. Razum. Postneklassika. — 2020. — № 4. — S. 40–51.

2. Ayusheeva I. Z. Grazhdansko‑pravovoy rezhim obektov metavselennoy, virtualnoy i dopolnennoy realnosti // Aktual’nye problemy rossijskogo prava. — 2024. — T. 19. — № 12. — S. 48–56.

3. Bernatskiy G. G. Deformirovannoe pravosoznanie: puti vozniknoveniya i preodoleniya // Vestnik Voronezhskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya «Pravo». — 2025. — № 1 (60). — S. 43–51.

4. Egorova M. A., Kozhevina O. V. Mesto kriptovalyuty v sisteme obektov grazhdanskikh prav // Aktual’nye problemy rossijskogo prava. — 2020. — T. 15. — № 1. — S. 81–91.

5. Kashkin S. Yu. Pravo v usloviyakh antropologicheskogo tsivilizatsionnogo perekhoda v tsifrovoe obshchestvo // Vestnik Rossiyskogo novogo universiteta. Seriya «Chelovek i obshchestvo». — 2024. — № 4. — S. 85–96.

6. Kiselev A. F., Lubkov A. V., Pakhomov N. N. Obrazovanie v perspektive globalnogo antropologicheskogo perekhoda (pedagogicheskaya utopiya dlya XXI veka) // Vysshee obrazovanie segodnya. — 2019. — № 3. — S. 76–83.

7. Rozhkova M. A. Tsifrovye aktivy i virtualnoe imushchestvo: kak sootnositsya virtualnoe s tsifrovym // Zakon.ru. 2018. 13 iyunya. — URL: https://zakon.ru/blog/2018/06/13/cifrovye_aktivy_i_virtualnoe_imuschestvo_kak_sootnositsya_virtualnoe_s_cifrovym.

8. Sitnik A. A. NFT kak obekt pravovogo regulirovaniya // Aktual’nye problemy rossijskogo prava. — 2022. — T. 17. — № 12. — S. 84–93.

9. Somova I. Yu., Ipatova K. S., Amelchenko A. Ya. Biotsifrovaya konvergentsiya kak instrument transgumanizma: metody i tseli antropologicheskogo perekhoda // Mir nauki. Sotsiologiya, filologiya, kulturologiya. — 2023. — T. 14. — № 3. — URL: https://sfk‑mn.ru/PDF/04SCSK323.pdf.

10. Stepanov O. A., Stepanov M. M. O pravovom reagirovanii na posledstviya povedeniya lichnosti v virtualnom prostranstve // Pravoprimenenie. — 2024. — T. 8. — № 1. — S. 24–33.

11. Stepanov O. A., Stepanov M. M. O tsifrovoy identichnosti cheloveka v virtualnom prostranstve // Rossiyskaya yustitsiya. — 2025. — № 10. — S. 30–35.

12. Sukhanov E. A. O grazhdansko‑pravovoy prirode «tsifrovogo imushchestva» // Vestnik grazhdanskogo prava. — 2021. — T. 21. — № 6. — S. 7–29.

13. Khabrieva T. Ya. Pravo v realiyakh tekhnologicheskoy revolyutsii: monografiya. — M.: Norma; Infra‑M, 2025. — 168 s.

14. Khabrieva T. Ya. Pravovye ocherki tekhnologicheskoy revolyutsii: monografiya. — M.: Norma; Infra‑M; Rossiyskaya akademiya nauk, 2025. — 144 s.

15. Dobrynskaya V., Strelnikov V. Videogame Attributes as Alternative Investments // URL: https://ssrn.com/abstract=5209656.

16. Stepanov O. A., Stepanov M. M. On digital identification of actions personality // State and Law. — 2024. — No. 7. — P. 205–210.


Review

For citations:


Stepanov O.A., Stepanov M.M. Individual Legal Consciousness Formation in the Context of the Use of Virtual Gaming Assets. Actual Problems of Russian Law. 2026;21(8):40-47. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17803/1994-1471.2026.189.8.040-047

Views: 100

JATS XML


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1994-1471 (Print)
ISSN 2782-1862 (Online)