Critical Review of the System of Motives for Criminal Case Initiation
https://doi.org/10.17803/1994-1471.2019.98.1.138-145
##article.abstract##
The significance of the reasons for initiating a criminal case is extremely high, since the reason triggers the criminal procedure mechanism, gives rise to subjective rights and obligations of the participants in the criminal process at the stage of initiating a criminal case and the stage itself. At the same time, the definition of the “reason for initiating a criminal case” have not found its fixation in the Criminal Procedural Code of the Russian Federation, the semantic content of this term and its related categories do not agree with each other in terms oftheir system analysis, and therefore the question of its essence is still debatable. The only reason for the problem of initiating a criminal case was the legislator, since the legal structure of the Criminal Procedural Code of the Russian Federation norms on criminal cases correspond neither to the norms of the Russian language, nor to the requirements of formal logic, nor to the rules of legislative technique. Systematically examining this problem, the author comes to the conclusion that there is a need for profound changes in the norms regulating the reasons for initiating a criminal case, namely, the normative statement of a single concept that presupposes a common understanding of the reasons, their consistency, subsequence, unity of terminology, classification, clear separation from sources and messages about the crime.
##article.author.about##
A. M. Kosenko
Nyagansky Interdistrict Investigation Department of the Investigation Directorate of the Investigative Committee of the Russian Federation for the Khanty-Mansiysk Autonomous Okrug — Ugra
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Kosenko Andrey Mikhailovich, Senior Investigator of the Nyagansky Interdistrict Investigation Department of the Investigation Directorate of the Investigative Committee of the Russian Federation for the Khanty-Mansiysk Autonomous Okrug — Ugra, Major of Justice, Postgraduate of the Moscow Academy of the Investigative Committee of the Russian Federation
628181, Russia, Khanty-Mansiysk Autonomous Okrug — Ugra, Nyagan, microdistrict 6, d. 4
##submission.citations##
1. Arsen’ev V. D. Dokazyvanie fakticheskikh obstoyatel’stv dela v otdel’nykh stadiyakh sovetskogo ugolovnogo protsessa // Voprosy bor’by s prestupnost’yu. Trudy Irkutskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya yuridicheskaya. — 1969. — Vyp. 8. — Ch. 4. — T. 45. S. 3—196.
2. Budnikov V. L., Smagorinskaya E. B. Uchastie advokata v formirovanii i issledovanii dokazatel’stv v dosudebnom ugolovnom proizvodstve : lektsiya. — Volgograd, 2004. — 48 s.
3. Dikarev I. S. [i dr.] Sushchnost’ i aktual’nye problemy stadii vozbuzhdeniya ugolovnogo dela. — M., 2012. — 408 s.
4. Zinovkina I. N. Proverka zayavleniy i soobshcheniy o prestupleniyakh: problemy pravovogo regulirovaniya : dis. … kand. yurid. nauk. — M., 2015. — 262 s.
5. Kapranov A. V. Optimizatsiya stadii vozbuzhdeniya ugolovnogo dela : dis. … kand. yurid. nauk. — Rostov n/D, 2005. — 183 s.
6. Kolomeets V. K. Polozheniya o yavke s povinnoy v rossiyskom zakonodatel’stve (1845—2005 gg.) // Zhurnal rossiyskogo prava. — 2006. — № 1. — S. 142—148.
7. Kop’eva A. N. Znachenie dokumentov pri vozbuzhdenii ugolovnogo dela // Voprosy bor’by s prestupnost’yu. Trudy Irkutskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya yuridicheskaya. — 1971. — Vyp. 11. — Ch. 4. — T. 81. — S. 88—98.
8. Krasnov Yu. K., Nadvikova V. V., Shkatulla V. I. Yuridicheskaya tekhnika : uchebnik. — M., 2014. — 536 s.
9. Matuzov M. I., Mal’ko A. V. Teoriya gosudarstva i prava : uchebnik. — M., 2004. — 512 s.
10. Ryzhakov A. P. Soobshchenie o prestuplenii po «versii» Sledstvennogo komiteta RF // Sovetnik yurista. — 2011. — № 11. — S. 8—20.
11. Slovar’ russkogo yazyka : v 4 t. / pod obshchey red. A. P. Evgen’evoy. — M., 1985. — T. 1. — 696 s.
12. Slovar’ russkogo yazyka : v 4 t. / pod obshchey red. A. P. Evgen’evoy. — M., 1988. — T. 4. — S. 800.
13. Tomin V. T., Polyakov M. P., Popov A. P. Ocherki teorii effektivnogo ugolovnogo protsessa. — Pyatigorsk, 2000. — 239 s.
14. Ushakov D. N. Tolkoviy slovar’ sovremennogo russkogo yazyka. — M., 2014. — 800 s.
15. Yakimovich Yu. K., Pan T. D. Dosudebnoe proizvodstvo po UPK Rossiyskoy Federatsii (uchastniki dosudebnogo proizvodstva, dokazatel’stva i dokazyvanie, vozbuzhdenie ugolovnogo dela, doznanie i predvaritel’noe sledstvie). — SPb., 2003. — 297 s.
##reviewer.review.form##
##article.forCitation##
Kosenko A.M. Critical Review of the System of Motives for Criminal Case Initiation. Actual Problems of Russian Law. 2019;(1):138-145. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17803/1994-1471.2019.98.1.138-145
##common.article.views##:
1109
JATS XML
Email this article 