Uncertainty of the Procedural Status of the Commissioner for the Protection of the Rights of Entrepreneurs for the President of the Russian Federation as a Threat to Independence of Pre-trial Officials
https://doi.org/10.17803/1994-1471.2019.98.1.146-155
Abstract
The uncertainty of the procedural status of the Commissioner for the Protection of the Rights of Entrepreneurs for the President of the Russian Federation is substantiated. It is concluded that the Commissioner has a non-procedural effect on the officials conducting pre-trial proceedings. It is recognized that the participation of the Commissioner in criminal proceedings is possible, but his activity must become procedural in nature. To this end, proposals are being formulated for the improvement of regulatory legal acts and law enforcement practice.
About the Author
P. O. Panfilov
Kikot Moscow University of the Ministry of the Interior of Russia
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Panfilov Pavel Olegvich, Postgraduate in a Military College of the Department of Criminal Procedure
117437, Russia, Moscow, ul. Akademika Volgina, d. 12
References
1. Astaf’ev Yu. V. Normativnye probely obespecheniya zakonnykh interesov uchastnikov stadii vozbuzhdeniya ugolovnogo dela // Problemy otpravleniya pravosudiya po ugolovnym delam v sovremennoy Rossii: teoriya i praktika. — Kursk, 2015. — S. 16—24.
2. Starodubova G. V. Zapret vneprotsessual’nykh obrashcheniy kak garantiya nezavisimosti sudey v ugolovnom protsesse // Vestnik VGU. Seriya : Pravo. — 2017. — № 3. — S. 257—262.
3. Strogovich M. S. Kurs sovetskogo ugolovnogo protsessa. — M. : Nauka, 1968. — T. 1. — 470 s.
4. Tomin V. T. Izbrannye trudy. — SPb. : Yuridicheskiy tsentr-Press, 2004. — 586 s.
5. Tomin V. T. Printsipy sovetskogo ugolovnogo protsessa // Praktikum po sovetskomu ugolovnomu protsess. — Gor’kiy : GVSh MVD SSSR, 1988. — 104 s.
6. Filippov A. G. Realizatsiya printsipa protsessual’noy nezavisimosti dolzhnostnykh lits — uchastnikov ugolovnogo protsessa : dis. … kand. yurid. nauk. — N. Novgorod, 2004. — 217 s.
7. Emikh V. V. Upolnomochennye po zashchite prav predprinimateley: zarubezhniy opyt i rossiyskaya model’ // Nauchniy ezhegodnik Instituta filosofii i prava Ural’skogo otdeleniya Rossiyskoy akademii nauk. — 2014. — T. 14. — Vyp. 3. — S. 177—198.
8. Etina T. S. Vneprotsessual’nye obrashcheniya k sudu: voprosy pravovoy reglamentatsii // Vestnik Kemerovskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. — 2015. — № 2 (62). — T. 2. —S. 232—237.
9. Bozh’ev V. P. Ugolovno-protsessual’nye pravootnosheniya. — M. : Yuridicheskaya literatura, 1975. — 176 s.
10. Boytsova V. V. Pravovoy institut ombudsmena v sisteme vzaimodeystviya gosudarstva i grazhdanskogo obshchestva : avtoref. dis. … d-ra yurid. nauk. — M., 1995. — 40 s.
11. Viktorskiy S. I. Russkiy ugolovniy protsess : uchebnoe posobie. — M. : Gorodets, 1997. — 448 s.
12. Vlasenko V. V. «Amnistiya kapitalov» kak osobiy vid osvobozhdeniya ot ugolovnoy otvetstvennosti po delam o prestupleniyakh v sfere ekonomicheskoy deyatel’nosti (ch. 3 st. 76.1 UK RF) // Ugolovnoe pravo. — 2016. — № 1. — S. 9—13.
13. Gavrilin Yu. V. Zashchita prav sub”ektov predprinimatel’skoy deyatel’nosti ot nezakonnogo i neobosnovannogo ugolovnogo presledovaniya // Advokatskaya praktika. — 2013. — № 6. — S. 25—28.
14. Kokorev L. D. Polozhenie lichnosti v sovetskom ugolovnom sudoproizvodstve : avtoref. dis. … d-ra yurid. nauk. — Voronezh, 1974. — 40 s.
15. Pobedkin A. V. Garantii nezavisimosti ili korporativnye privilegii? // Vestnik Voronezhskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. — 2014. — № 1 (16). — S. 115—127.
16. Pobedkin A. V. Ugolovniy protsess: sostoyanie vne prava : monografiya. — M. : Yurlitinform, 2013. — 248 s.
Review
For citations:
Panfilov P.O. Uncertainty of the Procedural Status of the Commissioner for the Protection of the Rights of Entrepreneurs for the President of the Russian Federation as a Threat to Independence of Pre-trial Officials. Actual Problems of Russian Law. 2019;(1):146-155. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17803/1994-1471.2019.98.1.146-155
Views:
637
Email this article 