The State Sovereignty in the Context of Attracting Foreign Investments
https://doi.org/10.17803/1994-1471.2018.97.12.026-038
Abstract
The paper explores various concepts of the notion of sovereignty of the state, its content, including modern theories, whose representatives write about the sunset, twilight, transformation of sovereignty in the context of globalization. Globalization can adversely affect the social sphere, economy and other spheres of state activity, but it does not lead to the withering away of the main functions of the state, as well as the state itself. Entering into an integration association, becoming a party to an international treaty, the state does not limit its sovereignty, but, on the contrary, uses its sovereign rights. The problem of state sovereignty has acquired special significance today in connection with the process of attracting foreign investment. Foreign investment, being a boon to the economy of the host state, may pose a threat to the security of the state. The states, being sovereign, themselves have the right to decide whether to allow foreign investors into theirterritory or not. Many states have entered into international investment treaties to encourage and protect foreign investment. These agreements provide for the possibility of an investor applying to a foreign state for international arbitration, despite the absence of a separate arbitration clause between the investor and the state. Based on a study of the theoretical issues of state sovereignty, it is concluded that such international treaties do not violate the sovereignty of the state, since states voluntarily become parties to such agreements and themselves allow investors to use the arbitration method of dispute resolution.
About the Authors
G. K. DmitrievaRussian Federation
DMITRIEVA Galina Kirillovna, Doctor of Law, Professor of the Department of Private International Law, Honored Worker of Higher Education of the Russian Federation
125993, Russia, Moscow, ul. Sadovaya-Kudrinskaya, d. 9
N. N. Viktorova
Russian Federation
VIKTOROVA Natalia Nikolaevna, PhD in Law, Associate Professor of the Department of Private International Law
125993, Russia, Moscow, ul. Sadovaya-Kudrinskaya, d. 9
References
1. Blishchenko I. P., Doria Zh. Ponyatie ekonomicheskogo suvereniteta gosudarstva // Pravovedenie. — 2000. — № 1. — S. 200—217.
2. Kanashevskiy V. A. Mezhdunarodnoe chastnoe pravo : uchebnik. — 3-e izd., pererab. i dop.— M. : Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya, 2016. — 1008 s.
3. Karro D., Zhyuyar P. Mezhdunarodnoe ekonomicheskoe pravo : uchebnik. — M. : Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya, 2001. — 608 s.
4. Kartashkin V. A. Verkhovenstvo mezhdunarodnogo prava i gosudarstvenniy suverenitet // Rossiyskiy ezhegodnik mezhdunarodnogo prava. 2013. — M., 2014. — S. 14—26.
5. Kozlova E. I., Kutafin O. E. Konstitutsionnoe pravo Rossii : uchebnik. — M. : Yurist”, 2003. — 587 c.
6. Levin I. D. Suverenitet. — M., 2003. — 223 s.
7. Lukashuk I. I. Mezhdunarodnoe pravo. Obshchaya chast’ : uchebnik dlya studentov yurid. fak-tov i vuzov. — M. : Volters Kluver, 2005. — 432 s.
8. Lukashuk I. I. Globalizatsiya, gosudarstvo, pravo. XXI vek. — M. : Spark, 2000. — 279 s.
9. Lukashuk I. I. Pravo mezhdunarodnoy otvetstvennosti. — M., 2004. — 432 s.
10. Palienko N. N. Suverenitet. Istoricheskoe razvitie idei suvereniteta i ego pravovoe znachenie. — Yaroslavl’, 1903. — 569 s.
11. Pastukhova N. B. Natsional’no-gosudarstvenniy suverenitet v kontekste globalizatsii, integratsionnykh protsessov v mire, novykh vyzovov i ugroz // Lex Russica. — 2006. — № 1. — S. 26—43.
12. Pravo Evropeyskogo Soyuza : uchebnik dlya vuzov / pod red. S. Yu. Kashkina. — M., 2004.— 925 s.
13. Protopopov A. S., Koz’menko V. M., Elmanova N. S. Istoriya mezhdunarodnykh otnosheniy i vneshney politiki Rossii (1648—2005) : uchebnik dlya studentov vuzov / pod red. A. S. Protopopova. — M., 2006. — 399 s.
14. Tagasheva O. V., Ageshkina N. A., Gerasimenko N. S. Kommentariy k Federal’nomu zakonu ot 29 aprelya 2008 g. № 57-FZ «O poryadke osushchestvleniya inostrannykh investitsiy v khozyaystvennye obshchestva, imeyushchie strategicheskoe znachenie dlya obespecheniya oborony strany i bezopasnosti gosudarstva» // SPS «Garant», 2013.
15. Terent’eva L. V. Sootnoshenie ponyatiy «yurisdiktsiya» i «suverenitet» // Vestnik Universiteta imeni O.E. Kutafina (MGYuA). — 2016. — № 12 (28). — S. 126—133.
16. Farkhutdinov I. Z. Inostrannye investitsii: vyzov ekonomicheskomu suverenitetu // Moskovskiy zhurnal mezhdunarodnogo prava. — 2008. — № 3 (71). — S. 5—20.
17. Shumilov V. M. Mezhdunarodnoe ekonomicheskoe pravo. — Rostov n/D : Feniks, 2003. — 512 s.
18. Yakovyuk I. V., Shestopal S. S. Gosudarstvenniy suverenitet i suverennye prava: problema sootnosheniya // Azimut nauchnykh issledovaniy: ekonomika i upravlenie. — 2017. — T. 6. — № 4 (21). — S. 381—387.
19. Dolzer R. The Impact of International Investment Treaties on Domestic Administrative Law // International Law and Politics. — 2005. — Vol. 37:953. — P. 953—972.
20. Kennedy J. Protecting Regulatory Measures in Investment Treaty Law // Czech Yearbook of International Law. — 2013. — Vol. IV. — P. 3—25.
21. Sornarajah M. The International Law on Foreign Investment. — 2nd ed. — Cambridge, 2007. — 525 p.
22. Wriston W. B. The Twilight of Sovereignty, a speech delivered at the Commonwealth Club on 10 November 1992 in San Francisco, California // URL: https://dl.tufts.edu/catalog/tufts:MS134.001.010.00010.00001 (дата обращения: 21.06.2018).
Review
For citations:
Dmitrieva G.K., Viktorova N.N. The State Sovereignty in the Context of Attracting Foreign Investments. Actual Problems of Russian Law. 2018;(12):26-38. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17803/1994-1471.2018.97.12.026-038