Legal Regime of the Results of Intellectual Activities of Budgetary Institutions in Science and Education
https://doi.org/10.17803/1994-1471.2018.97.12.123-130
Abstract
The status of the institution as a “holder” of the founder’s property makes one think about the need to apply, by analogy of the law, the provisions governing the right of operational management to relations regarding the disposal of the institution with its exclusive rights. Given the fact that the prerequisites for introducing the consent of the founder as a necessary condition for disposing of the valuable property of the institution are equally applicable both to objects of real rights and exclusive rights to the results of intellectual activity. However, the author justifies the inadmissibility of the application by analogy of the law of the provisions of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation limiting the powers of the budget institution to dispose of the property assigned to it on the right of operational management, indicating that there is no regulation gap that would require replenishment. In this regard, the author comes to the conclusion that, as a general rule, a budget institution has the right to independently manage its exclusive rights to the results of intellectual activity without the founder’s consent.
About the Author
V. A. Savinykh
St. Petersburg State University (SPbSU)
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
SAVINYKH Vladislav Alekseevich, PhD in Law, Associate Professor of the Department of Administrative and Financial Law of the Law Faculty
199106, Russia, St. Petersburg, 22nd line of Vasilyevsky Island, d. 7
References
1. Vasil’eva E. N. Prava na rezul’taty intellektual’noy deyatel’nosti, sozdannye v byudzhetnykh uchrezhdeniyakh za schet sredstv federal’nogo byudzheta // Trudy Instituta gosudarstva i prava RAN. — 2012. — № 3. — S. 150—164.
2. Voynikanis E. A., Kalyatin V. O. Baza dannykh kak ob”ekt pravovogo regulirovaniya : uchebnoe posobie dlya vuzov. — M. : Statut, 2011. — 174 s.
3. Gavrilov E. Zakonodatel’stvo ob intellektual’nykh pravakh: novelly, vnesennye Federal’nym zakonom ot 12 marta 2014 goda № 35-FZ v glavu 69 GK RF // Khozyaystvo i pravo. — 2014. — № 8. — S. 50—67.
4. Gavrilov E. P. Veshchnye prava v chetvertoy chasti GK RF posle 30 sentyabrya 2014 g. // Patenty i litsenzii. — 2014. — № 7. — S. 2—10.
5. Grazhdanskiy kodeks Rossiyskoy Federatsii. Avtorskoe pravo. Prava, smezhnye s avtorskimi. Postateyniy kommentariy k glavam 69—71 / B. M. Gongalo, V. O. Kalyatin, M. Ya. Kirillova [i dr.] ; pod red. P. V. Krasheninnikova. — M: Statut, 2014. — 510 s.
6. Eremenko V. I. O sozdanii byudzhetnymi uchrezhdeniyami nauki i obrazovaniya khozyaystvennykh obshchestv // Zakonodatel’stvo i ekonomika. — 2010. — № 1. — S. 26—29.
7. Eremenko V. I., Evdokimova V. N. Novovvedeniya v chasti obshchikh polozheniy v razdele VII Grazhdanskogo kodeksa RF // Advokat. — 2014. — № 10. — S. 12—25.
8. Pravo intellektual’noy sobstvennosti : uchebnik / E. V. Badulina, D. A. Gavrilov, E. S. Grin’ [i dr.] ; pod obshch. red. L. A. Novoselovoy. — M. : Statut, 2017. — T. 1 : Obshchie polozheniya. — 512 s.
9. Sergeev A. P. Primenenie pravil o vindikatsii k razresheniyu sporov po povodu tovarnykh znakov // Zakon. — 2017. — № 1. — S. 91—96.
10. Chelyshev M. Yu., Vorob’ev Yu. N. Pravovoy rezhim intellektual’noy sobstvennosti v gosudarstvennom vuze // Intellektual’naya sobstvennost’. Aktual’nye problemy teorii i praktiki : sbornik nauchnykh trudov / pod red. V. N. Lopatina. — M. : Yurayt, 2008. — T. 1. — S. 84—93.
Review
For citations:
Savinykh V.A. Legal Regime of the Results of Intellectual Activities of Budgetary Institutions in Science and Education. Actual Problems of Russian Law. 2018;(12):123-130. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17803/1994-1471.2018.97.12.123-130
Views:
468
Email this article 