Preview

Actual Problems of Russian Law

Advanced search

A Protocol as an Unnecessary Element in the Mechanism of Detention of a Person on Suspicion of Committing a Crime

https://doi.org/10.17803/1994-1471.2018.97.12.150-165

Abstract

In this paper the author examines the Protocol of Detention of the Suspect as a criminal procedural act recording the decision of the investigator concerning short-term restriction of the constitutional human right to freedom and personal inviolability. Relying methodologically on the true purpose of detention of the suspect in the general system of rights-limiting mechanisms in the field of crime detection, disclosure and investigation, the author concludes that the procedural decision on its implementation (detention protocol) lacks the “high” legal meaning that is embedded in other legislative acts governing preliminary investigation. The author believes that, despite the criminal procedural formalization, the detention of the suspect, in fact, remains a preventive “police” measure used for the purpose of “external,” “pre-trial” ensuring of a favorable regime of pre-trial proceedings in the criminal case. In this regard, it is proposed to exclude the detention protocol from the sphere of criminal procedure and transfer it to the administrative jurisdiction of the police and other “law enforcement” agencies engaged in the actual detention and transportation of potential suspects.

About the Author

S. B. Rossinskiy
Kutafin Moscow State Law University (MSAL)
Russian Federation

ROSSINSKIY Sergei Borisovich, Doctor of Law, Associate Professor, Professor of the Department of Criminal Procedure Law

125993, Russia, Moscow, ul. Sadovaya-Kudrinskaya, d. 9




References

1. Avdeev V. N., Bogatskiy F. A. Podozrevaemiy v ugolovnom sudoproizvodstve Rossii. — Kaliningrad : KYuI MVD Rossii, 2006.

2. Baev O. Ya., Baev M. O. Sovremenniy pravoy mekhanizm zaderzhaniya podozrevaemogo v sovershenii prestupleniya i problemy ego sovershenstvovaniya // Vestnik Voronezhskogo gosuniversiteta. Seriya : Pravo. — 2016. — № 2.

3. Berezin M. N., Gutkin I. M., Chuvilev A. A. Zaderzhanie v sovetskom ugolovnom sudoproizvodstve. — M. : Akademiya MVD SSSR, 1975.

4. Berezina E. S. Zaderzhanie podozrevaemogo kak institut ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva : dis. … kand. yurid. nauk. — M. : VNII MVD Rossii, 2009.

5. Vasil’eva E. G. Problemy ogranicheniya neprikosnovennosti lichnosti v ugolovnom protsesse : dis. … kand. yurid. nauk. — Ufa : Bashkirskiy gosuniversitet, 2002.

6. Veretennikov I. A. Zaderzhanie podozrevaemogo kak kompleksniy pravovoy institut : dis. … kand. yurid. nauk. — M. : YuI MVD Rossii, 2001.

7. Grigor’ev V. N. Zaderzhanie podozrevaemogo. — M. : YurInfor, 1999.

8. Gutkin I. M. Aktual’nye voprosy ugolovno-protsessual’nogo zaderzhaniya : uchebnoe posobie. — M. : Akademiya MVD SSSR, 1980.

9. Gutkin I. M. Mery presecheniya v sovetskom ugolovnom protsesse. — M. : VSh MOOP RSFSR, 1963.

10. Zaytsev O. A., Smirnov P. A. Podozrevaemiy v ugolovnom protsesse. — M. : Ekzamen, 2005.

11. Zaytseva L. L., Purs A. G. Zaderzhanie v ugolovnom protsesse respubliki Belarus’. — Minsk : Kharvest, 2011.

12. Klyukov E. M. Mera protsessual’nogo prinuzhdeniya. — Kazan’ : Kazanskiy gosuniversitet, 1974.

13. Kovriga Z. F. Ugolovno-protsessual’noe prinuzhdenie. — Voronezh : Voronezhskiy gosuniversitet, 1975.

14. Kommentariy k Ugolovno-protsessual’nomu kodeksu RSFSR / pod obshch. red. V. T. Tomina. — M. : Verdikt, 1996.

15. Kurs ugolovnogo protsessa / pod red. L. V. Golovko. — M. : Statut, 2016.

16. Livshits Yu. D. Mery presecheniya v sovetskom ugolovnom protsesse. — M. : Yurid. lit., 1964.

17. Livshits Yu. D., Ginzburg A. Ya. Mery presecheniya i zaderzhanie v sovetskom ugolovnom protsesse. — AlmaAta : Alma-Atinskoe otdelenie FZO VSh MVD SSSR, 1961.

18. Mikhaylov V. A. Metodologicheskie osnovy mer presecheniya. — M. : Akademiya upravleniya MVD Rossii, 1998.

19. Murav’ev K. V. Mery ugolovno-protsessual’nogo prinuzhdeniya — osobye sredstva ugolovno-pravovogo vozdeystviya: doktrina, primenenie, optimizatsiya. — Omsk : Omskaya akademiya MVD Rossii, 2017.

20. Rozin N. N. Ugolovnoe sudoproizvodstvo. — SPb. : Yuridicheskiy knizhniy sklad «Pravo», 1914.

21. Rossinskiy S. B. Pravovye usloviya primeneniya mer ugolovno-protsessual’nogo presecheniya privodyat k pospeshnosti i neobosnovannosti obvineniya // Zakony Rossii: opyt, analiz, praktika. — 2018. — № 5.

22. Strogovich M. S. Ugolovniy protsess : uchebnik dlya yuridicheskikh vuzov i fakul’tetov. — M. : MYu SSSR, 1946.

23. Tkacheva N. V. Mery presecheniya, ne svyazannye s zaklyucheniem pod strazhu v ugolovnom protsesse Rossii. — Chelyabinsk : Yuzhno-Ural’skiy gosuniversitet, 2004.

24. Foynitskiy I. Ya. Kurs ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva. — SPb. : Al’fa, 1996. — T. 2.

25. Khimicheva O. V., Sharov D. V. Nekotorye aspekty obespecheniya prav litsa pri zaderzhanii po podozreniyu v sovershenii prestupleniya // Zakony Rossii: opyt, analiz, praktika. — 2018. — № 5.


Review

For citations:


Rossinskiy S.B. A Protocol as an Unnecessary Element in the Mechanism of Detention of a Person on Suspicion of Committing a Crime. Actual Problems of Russian Law. 2018;(12):150-165. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17803/1994-1471.2018.97.12.150-165

Views: 631


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1994-1471 (Print)
ISSN 2782-1862 (Online)