The Prospects for the Forensic Experts’ Portrait Video Images Comprehensive Examination
https://doi.org/10.17803/1994-1471.2018.97.12.166-174
Abstract
The study of the practice of portrait examinations carried out by forensic expert institutions of Russia shows that the forensic examination of video images becomes complex and requires joint participation of forensic experts of different qualifications. The problem of establishing the authenticity of the video document submitted for examination, which is resolved by experts in the field of photo and video expertise, becomes urgent. Without establishing the fact of the integrity of the original record, the conclusion of an expert in the field of portrait examination will be unreliable. Experts in the field of habitoscopy are majoring in resolving issues of identification on the basis of person’s appearance. The joint participation of experts mentioned above facilitates the establishment of the sequence of actions of the participants of the incident, as well as the degree of technical factors influence on changes in the appearance of a person in the process of video recording. Accumulation of the empirical basis for carrying out complex examinations in the future will create an algorithm for a high-tech research.
About the Author
I. N. Podvolotskiy
Kutafin Moscow State Law University (MSAL)
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
PODVOLOTSKIY Igor Nikolaevich, PhD in Law, Associate Professor of the Department of Forensic Expertise
125993, Russia, Moscow, ul. Sadovaya-Kudrinskaya, d. 9
References
1. Bulgakov V. G. Osnovy kriminalisticheskogo issledovaniya dinamicheskikh priznakov cheloveka : monografiya. — M. : Yurlitinform, 2009. — 170 s.
2. Bulgakov V. G. Vozmozhnosti sudebno-ekspertnoy identifikatsii cheloveka po pokhodke, otobrazivsheysya v materialakh videozapisi // Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta MVD Rossii. — M., 2013. — S. 10—11.
3. Bulgakov V. G. Metodicheskie osnovy kriminalisticheskoy identifikatsii i diagnostiki cheloveka po ego dinamicheskim priznakam : monografiya. — M. : Yurlitinform, 2014. — 144 s.
4. Blokhin A. S., Zotov A. B., Kaganov A. Sh., Nazin L. F. Kontseptual’nye osnovy kriminalisticheskoy ekspertizy videozapisey. — M., 2011. — 200 s.
5. Davydov E. V., Finogenov V. F. Sovremennye vozmozhnosti ekspertnogo issledovaniya ob”ektov, poluchennykh tsifrovym sposobom. — M., 2014. — 57 s.
6. Zhuravlev I. L., Sokolov A. Yu., Kadeyshvili A. A. Effektivnost’ identifikatsii i verifikatsii lits neyronnoy set’yu pri nizkom kachestve fotoizobrazheniy // Entsiklopediya sudebnoy ekspertizy. — 2017. — № 2 (13). — S. 76—88.
7. Zinin A. M. Problemy kriminalisticheskogo ustanovleniya lichnosti // Vestnik kriminalistiki. — 2003. — Vyp. 4 (8). — S. 29—33.
8. Zinin A. M., Zotov A. B., Budanov S. A. Kriminalisticheskoe ustanovlenie lichnosti cheloveka s ispol’zovaniem foto-, videoizobrazheniy i sub”ektivnykh portretov. — M., 1998. — 22 s.
9. Il’in N. N. Kriminalisticheskaya identifikatsiya cheloveka po priznakam vneshnego oblika, zapechatlennym na videoizobrazheniyakh. — M., 2015. — 216 s.
10. Rossinskaya E. R., Galyashina E. I., Zinin A. M. Teoriya sudebnoy ekspertizy (Sudebnaya ekspertologiya) : uchebnik. — 2-e izd., pererab. i dop. — M., 2016. — 368 s.
11. Surzhikov M. L., Postavnin V. I., Ivanov P. Yu. Kriminalisticheskie trebovaniya na ustanovku i ekspluatatsiyu televizionnykh sistem nablyudeniya : Inform. pis’mo. — M., 2001. — 32 s.
Review
For citations:
Podvolotskiy I.N. The Prospects for the Forensic Experts’ Portrait Video Images Comprehensive Examination. Actual Problems of Russian Law. 2018;(12):166-174. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17803/1994-1471.2018.97.12.166-174
Views:
557
Email this article 