Challenges of Teaching Constitutional Law in a Secular State
https://doi.org/10.17803/1994-1471.2018.97.12.211-217
Abstract
The article deals with the problem of integrity of scientific views on the generally recognized constitutional norms in the context of social regulation. Many constitutional scholars examine social norms separately from each other, rather than as a whole, which is unacceptable. The authors draw attention to the fact that morality is normative in nature and is closely linked to such social regulators as religion and law. That is why religious rules in universities should be studied and, subsequently, adequately reflected in rule-making and law enforcement activities. The criteria of distinction between law and morality are highlighted. The problem of separation of law from morality in the context of legal regulation is analyzed. The authors also conclude that the principles of international law on which the human rights system is built at the international level and in the national legislation can restrict human rights only in order to ensure the rights of others.
About the Authors
A. M. Osavelyuk
Kutafin Moscow State Law University (MSAL)
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
OSAVELYUK Aleksey Mikhailovich, Doctor of Law, Professor, Professor of the Department of Constitutional and Municipal Law
125993, Russia, Moscow, ul. Sadovaya-Kudrinskaya, d. 9
L. T. Chikhladze
Institute of the RUDN University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
CHIKHLADZE Levan Teimurazovich, Doctor of Law, Associate Professor, Head of the Department of Municipal Law
117198, Russia, Moscow, ul. Miklukho-Maklaya, d. 6
References
1. Alekseev S. S. Filosofiya prava. — M., 1999.
2. Berman G. Vera i zakon: primirenie prava i religii. — M., 1999.
3. Berman G. Dzh. Zapadnaya traditsiya prava: epokha formirovaniya. — M., 1994.
4. Var’yas M. Yu. Tserkovnoe pravo kak korporativnaya pravovaya sistema: opyt teoretiko-pravovogo issledovaniya // Pravovedenie. — 1995. — № 6.
5. David R. Osnovnye pravovye sistemy sovremennosti. — M., 1988.
6. David R., Zhoffre-Spinozi K. Osnovnye pravovye sistemy sovremennosti. — M. : Mezhdunar. otnosh-ya, 1996.
7. Il’in I. A. Sobranie sochineniy : v 10 t. — M., 1994. — T. 4.
8. Lopukhin A. P. Zakonodatel’stvo Moiseya. Issledovanie o semeynykh, sotsial’no-ekonomicheskikh i gosudarstvennykh zakonakh Moiseya. Sud nad Iisusom Khristom, rassmatrivaemiy s yuridicheskoy tochki zreniya. Vavilonskiy tsar’ pravdy Ammurabi i ego novootkrytoe zakonodatel’stvo v sopostavlenii s zakonodatel’stvom Moiseevym / pod red. i s predisl. prof. V. A. Tomsinova. — M. : Zertsalo, 2005.
9. Obshchaya teoriya prava i gosudarstva : uchebnik / pod red. V. V. Lazareva. — M., 1994.
10. Osavelyuk A. M. Gosudarstvo i tserkov’ : monografiya. — M. : RGTEU, 2010.
11. Osavelyuk A. M. Khristianskaya etika i svetskoe pravo // Russkiy mir — 2011 / gl. red. S. N. Baburin. — M., 2011.
12. Papayan R. A. Khristianskie korni sovremennogo prava. — M. : Norma, 2002.
13. Problemy obshchey teorii prava i gosudarstva : uchebnik dlya vuzov / pod obshch. red. akad. RAN V. S. Nersesyantsa. — M. : Norma, 2002.
14. Sbornik vazhneyshikh dokumentov po mezhdunarodnomu pravu. — M., 1996. — Ch. I.
15. Sovetu Bezopasnosti Organizatsii Ob”edinennykh Natsiy. Rezolyutsii XI Vsemirnogo russkogo narodnogo sobora ot 6 marta 2007 g. // Novaya kniga Rossii. — 2007. — № 4.
16. Tsvaygert K.,Ketts X. Vvedenie v sravnitel’noe pravovedenie v sfere chastnogo prava. — M., 1995. — T. 1 : Osnovy.
17. Chikhladze L. T., Babaeva Yu. G. Konstitutsionno-pravovoy status religioznykh ob”edineniy // Politika i obshchestvo. — 2008. — № 11.
18. Chicherin B. N. Filosofiya prava. — SPb. : Nauka, 1998.
Review
For citations:
Osavelyuk A.M., Chikhladze L.T. Challenges of Teaching Constitutional Law in a Secular State. Actual Problems of Russian Law. 2018;(12):211-217. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17803/1994-1471.2018.97.12.211-217
Views:
456
Email this article 