Preview

Actual Problems of Russian Law

Advanced search

Classification of crimes in designing criminal procedure regulations

https://doi.org/10.17803/1994-1471.2019.99.2.130-137

Abstract

The rules on categorization of crimes are substantive and legal by their nature. Nevertheless, they have a great influence on the state and development of criminal procedural matter. It is proposed to divide the provisions of the Criminal Procedural Code of the Russian Federation, which reflect the provisions of Art. 15 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation, into two groups. The first group includes the norms of criminal proceedings that are a kind of logical continuation of criminal law regulations related to exemption from criminal liability and punishment. The second group consists of strictly procedural rules that are not directly dependent on the substantive law: the composition of the bench, jurisdiction and competence of criminal cases, bail hearing, negotiations control and recording, the return of a criminal case to the prosecutor. Particular attention is given to the possibility for the court to change the classification of crimes. Based on the studied theoretical sources and court practice, the authors make suggestions aimed at improving the existing criminal procedure legislation and optimizing its application in the framework of the issues raised.

About the Authors

A. G. Kulev
P.G. Demidov Yaroslavl State University (YarSU).
Russian Federation

Kulev Aleksandr Gennadievich, PhD in Law, Associate Professor of the Department of Criminal Procedure and Forensic Science.

150029, Russia, Yaroslavl, ul. 8 Marta.



L. O. Kuleva
P.G. Demidov Yaroslavl State University (YarSU).
Russian Federation

Kuleva Lyudmila Olegovna, Postgraduate of the Department of Criminal Law and Criminology of the Faculty of Law.

150029, Russia, Yaroslavl, ul. 8 Marta.



References

1. Burmagin S. V. Status i deyatel’nost’ suda v ugolovnom protsesse : uchebnoe posobie. — M. : Prospekt, 2016. — 304 s.

2. Vzaimosvyaz’ ugolovnogo i ugolovno-protsessual’nogo prava : monografiya / pod obshch. red. M. B. Kostrovoy. — M. : Prospekt, 2015. — 296 s.

3. Kravtsova A. N. Predely polnomochiy suda kassatsionnoy instantsii po primeneniyu chasti 6 stat’i 15 UK RF // Zhurnal rossiyskogo prava. — 2014. — № 8. — S. 67—72.

4. Malkov V. P. Pravo suda na izmenenie kategorii prestupleniya // Zakonnost’. — 2013. — № 11. — S. 36—39.

5. Nastol’naya kniga sud’i : Rassmotrenie i razreshenie ugolovnykh del v apellyatsionnom poryadke : uchebnoprakticheskoe posobie dlya sudey / otv. red. O. A. Egorova, D. A. Fomin. — M. : Prospekt, 2015. — 336 s.

6. Rogova E. V. Uchenie o differentsiatsii ugolovnoy otvetstvennosti : dis. … d-ra yurid. nauk. — M., 2014. — 596 s.

7. Ryabtseva E. V. Pravosudie v ugolovnom protsesse : monografiya. — M. : Yurlitinform, 2010. — 400 s.

8. Ugolovno-protsessual’noe pravo. Aktual’nye problemy teorii i praktiki : uchebnik dlya magistrov / pod red. V. A. Lazarevoy, A. A. Tarasova. — M. : Yurayt, 2012. — 476 s.

9. Ugolovniy protsess : problemnye lektsii / pod red. V. T. Tomina, I. A. Zinchenko. — M. : Yurayt, 2013. — 799 s.

10. Khaydarov A. A. Znachenie instituta kategoriy prestupleniy dlya otechestvennogo ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva // Biblioteka kriminalista. — 2016. — № 3 (26). — S. 128—131.


Review

For citations:


Kulev A.G., Kuleva L.O. Classification of crimes in designing criminal procedure regulations. Actual Problems of Russian Law. 2019;(2):130-137. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17803/1994-1471.2019.99.2.130-137

Views: 894


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1994-1471 (Print)
ISSN 2782-1862 (Online)