Preview

Actual Problems of Russian Law

Advanced search

Criminal-legal value of special properties of the victim of a crime as the main or qualifying signs of crimes

https://doi.org/10.17803/1994-1471.2019.100.3.177-193

Abstract

In many norms of the Special Part of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation legal significance is attached to such special qualities of the victim as pregnancy, minority, old age, helplessness, illness and dependence on the culprit. They are considered as criminally-based or qualifying attributes. The main point of the research is the problems of reflection of the norms characterizing the victim signs in the criminal law and formulating corpus delicti taken them into account. According to the author, it is necessary to add the following. characteristic “seniority” into clause “v” Part 2 of Art. 105 of the Criminal Code; characteristics “pupillage” and “seniority” into Art. 110 and 110.1 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation which with the helplessness, dependence and pregnancy set forth therein should be identified as particularly qualifying circumstances; “seniority”, “dependence” and “pregnancy” into Art. 111 and 112 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation which with the minority and helplessness contained in the articles should be identified as particularly qualifying. Art. 115 and Part 2 of Art. 119 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation should be supplemented with pregnancy, pupillage, seniority, helplessness and dependence, with the first of them in the status of especially qualifying. Art. 117 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation should be supplemented with pupillage and seniority, which, together with the pregnancy, helplessness and dependence set forth in the article, should be singled out as particularly qualifying, etc.

About the Author

V. B. Khatuev
Chechen State University
Russian Federation

PhD in Law, Associate Professor of the Department of Criminal Law and Criminology of the Law Faculty,

364900, Grozny, Kievskaya ul., d. 33



References

1. Avdeeva M. V. Ob usilenii ugolovnoy otvetstvennosti za seksual’nye posyagatel’stva v otnoshenii nesovershennoletnikh // Zhurnal rossiyskogo prava. — 2011. — № 4. — S. 121—126.

2. Bagmet A. M., Skobelin S. Yu. Ugolovno-pravovaya okhrana materinstva i detstva // Yuridicheskiy mir. — 2015. — № 3. — S. 49—53.

3. Balashov S. M. Sostoyanie bespomoshchnosti poterpevshego v ugolovnom prave Rossii : avtoref. dis. … kand. yurid. nauk. — M., 2016. — 22 s.

4. Bimbinov A. A. Nenasil’stvennye polovye prestupleniya : dis. … kand. yurid. nauk. — M., 2015. — 227 s.

5. Burkina O., Kotel’nikova E. Priznaki poterpevshego v ugolovnom zakone (analiz novoy redaktsii st. 134 i 135 UK RF) // Ugolovnoe pravo. — 2010. — № 2. — S. 21—23.

6. Goncharov D. Yu. Kvalifikatsiya ubiystv : uchebnoe posobie. — Saratov, 2012. — 132 s.

7. Dubovichenko S. V. Spornye voprosu sub”ektivnoy storony prestupleniya v novom postanovlenii Plenuma Verkhovnogo Suda RF «O sudebnoy praktike po delam o prestupleniyakh protiv polovoy neprikosnovennosti i polovoy svobody lichnosti» // Vestnik Volzhskogo universiteta. — 2015. — № 2 (82). — S. 178—182.

8. Epikhin A. Yu. Problemy isklyucheniya priznaka «zavedomosti» iz dispozitsiy otdel’nykh sostavov prestupleniy na osnovanii Zakona № 14-FZ ot 29.02.2012 // Rossiyskiy sledovatel’. — 2013. — № 14. — S. 12—16.

9. Esakov G. Osoznanie vozrasta poterpevshego litsa v polovykh prestupleniyakh: pozitsiya sudebnoy praktiki // Ugolovnoe pravo. — 2011. — № 6. — S. 15—17.

10. Kameneva A. N. K voprosu ob usilenii ugolovnoy otvetstvennosti za prestupleniya protiv polovoy neprikosnovennosti nesovershennoletnikh // Aktual’nye problemy rossiyskogo ugolovnogo prava. — 2012. — № 3. — S. 162—168.

11. Kaufman M. A. Vozrastnye priznaki poterpevshego: diskussionnye aspekty ugolovno-pravovoy reglamentatsii // Ugolovnoe pravo. — 2015. — № 4. — S. 19—26.

12. Kruglikov L. L., Skripchenko N. Yu. Postanovlenie Plenuma Verkhovnogo Suda RF «O sudebnoy praktike primeneniya zakonodatel’stva, reglamentiruyushchego osobennosti ugolovnoy otvetstvennosti i nakazaniya nesovershennoletnikh» // Ugolovnoe pravo. — 2012. — № 1. — S. 40—44.

13. Lobanova L. V., Davtyan D. V. Ob ugolovno-pravovom znachenii prestarelogo vozrasta poterpevshego // Rossiyskaya yustitsiya. — 2010. — № 11 — S. 27—29.

14. Luneva A. V. Ugolovnaya otvetstvennost’ za detoubiystvo: problemy teorii i pravoprimeneniya : avtoref. dis. … kand. yurid. nauk. — M., 2013. — 27 s.

15. Morozov A. Problemy tolkovaniya i primeneniya stat’i 150 UK RF // Ugolovnoe pravo. — 2013. — № 1. — S. 54—59.

16. Murzina L. I. Ugolovnaya otvetstvennost’ za polovoe snoshenie i inye deystviya seksual’nogo kharaktera s litsom, ne dostigshim shestnadtsatiletnego vozrasta // Vestnik Penzenskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. — 2013. — № 3. — S. 61—65.

17. Polikashina O. V. Preduprezhdenie vovlecheniya nesovershennoletnikh v sovershenie prestupleniy i antiobshchestvennykh deystviy. — M., 2013. — 140 s.

18. Polyanskaya E. M. Problemy preduprezhdeniya ispol’zovaniya rabskogo truda i torgovli lyud’mi : avtoref. dis. … kand. yurid. nauk. — M., 2014. — 20 s.

19. Popov A. N. Kommentariy k postanovleniyu Plenuma Verkhovnogo Suda Rossiyskoy Federatsii «O sudebnoy praktike po delam o prestupleniyakh protiv polovoy neprikosnovennosti i polovoy svobody lichnosti» ot 4 dekabrya 2014 g. № 16. — SPb. : Sankt-Peterb. yurid. in-t (filial) Akademii Gen. prokuratury RF, 2016. — 40 s.

20. Pudovochkin Yu. E. Problemy ponimaniya i kvalifikatsii prestupleniy protiv polovoy neprikosnovennosti nesovershennoletnikh: novoe v ugolovnom zakonodatel’stve // Rossiyskoe pravosudie. — 2010. — № 4. — S. 64—76.

21. Reshetnikova G. A. Sudebnaya praktika po delam ob ubiystve (st. 105 UK RF) : uchebnoe posobie. — Izhevsk, 2012. — 103 s.

22. Romanov V. G. Ugolovnaya otvetstvennost’ za polovoe snoshenie i inye deystviya seksual’nogo kharaktera s litsom, ne dostigshim shestnadtsatiletnego vozrasta : dis. … kand. yurid. nauk. — M., 2013. — 218 s.

23. Sitnikova A. Prestupleniya seksual’nogo kharaktera: interpretatsiya norm i primenenie // Ugolovnoe pravo. — 2013. — № 2. — S. 29—34.

24. Syatkin N. N. Polovoe snoshenie i inye deystviya seksual’nogo kharaktera s litsom, ne dostigshim shestnadtsatiletnego vozrasta: zakonodatel’niy i pravoprimenitel’niy aspekty : dis. … kand. yurid. nauk. — Krasnodar, 2013. — 166 c.

25. Khatuev V. B. Ugolovnaya otvetstvennost’ za dovedenie do samoubiystva ili do pokusheniya na samoubiystvo. — M., 2015. — 448 s.

26. Khatuev V. B. Ugolovno-pravovoe znachenie osobykh kachestv poterpevshego kak obstoyatel’stv, otyagchayushchikh nakazanie // Vestnik MGU. — Seriya 11 «Pravo». — 2017. — № 3. — S. 40—60.

27. Shchipanova N. I., Lalats V. V. Kvalifikatsiya ubiystva pri oshibke litsa v svoystvakh lichnosti poterpevshey // Vestnik YuUrGU. — Seriya «Pravo». — 2013. — T. 13. — № 1. — S. 67—70.


Review

For citations:


Khatuev V.B. Criminal-legal value of special properties of the victim of a crime as the main or qualifying signs of crimes. Actual Problems of Russian Law. 2019;(3):177-193. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17803/1994-1471.2019.100.3.177-193

Views: 1908


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1994-1471 (Print)
ISSN 2782-1862 (Online)