Legislator’s error: types, reasons, ways of correction
https://doi.org/10.17803/1994-1471.2019.101.4.095-103
Abstract
The paper raises the question of the inevitability not only of judicial (in specific criminal cases) errors, but also of law enforcement errors (the practice of incorrect application of the criminal law established spontaneously or at the direction of higher judicial authorities), as well as legislative errors of political, system or technical nature. Considering the specific law-making mistakes made in the norms of the General Part and in each of the structural elements of many of the norms of the Special Part of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation, the author notes the appreciable work of the legislator to eliminate errors with satisfaction. At the same time, the paper provides specific examples of errors that are repeatedly noted in the special literature, still yet to be corrected, and suggests ways to correct them, in particular, amending the Regulations of the State Duma of the Federal Assembly of the Russian Federation regarding the procedure for discussing bills.
About the Author
A. I. Rarog
Kutafin Moscow State Law University (MSAL)
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Doctor of Law, Professor, Honored Scientist of the Russian Federation, Honorary Lawyer of the City of Moscow, Professor of the Department of Criminal Law,
125993, Moscow, ul. Sadovaya-Kudrinskaya, d. 9
References
1. Berner A. F. Uchebnik ugolovnogo prava. — SPb., 1865. — T. 1 : Chast’ Obshchaya. — 940 s.
2. Borisov S. V. K voprosu o kriminologicheskoj osnove sostava prestupleniya v vide posobnichestva v sovershenii terroristicheskogo akta // Kriminologicheskie osnovy ugolovnogo prava : materialy H Rossijskogo kongressa ugolovnogo prava. — M., 2016. — S. 285—288.
3. Burchak F. G. Uchenie o souchastii po sovetskomu ugolovnom pravu. — Kiev, 1969. — 216 s.
4. Gracheva Yu. V. Ocenka predelov sudejskogo usmotreniya v normah o zamene neotbytoj chasti nakazaniya bolee myagkim vidom nakazaniya // Ugolovnoe pravo: strategiya razvitiya v XXI veke : materialy X Mezhdunarodnoj nauchno-prakticheskoj konferencii. — M., 2013. — S. 176—178.
5. Groshev A. V. Antikorrupcionnye novelly ugolovnogo zakonodatel’stva Rossijskoj Federacii (kriticheskij analiz) // Sovremennye problemy ugolovnoj politiki. — Krasnodar, 2011. — T. 2. — S. 104—106.
6. Kadnikov N. G. K voprosu o kvalifikacii nekotoryh prestuplenij, posyagayushchih na obshchestvennuyu bezopasnost’ i obshchestvennyj poryadok // Vestnik Mosk. un-ta MVD Rossii. — 2092. — № 3. — S. 182—187.
7. Nekrasova A. A. Problemy sistematizacii ugolovno-pravovogo regulirovaniya special’nyh vidov prikosnovennosti i souchastiya v prestupleniyah terroristicheskogo haraktera // Obshchestvo i pravo. — 2016. — № 4 (58). — S. 69—71.
8. Rarog A. I. «Rabota nad oshibkami» — obyazannost’ zakonodatelya // Gosudarstvo i pravo. — 2014. — № 4. — S. 65—73.
9. Rossijskoe ugolovnoe pravo. Obshchaya i Osobennaya chasti : v 3 t. / pod red. N. A. Lopashenko. — M., 2014. — T. 3. — 664 s.
10. Savenko I. A. Izmeneniya v zakonodatel’stve po prestupleniyam korrupcionnoj napravlennosti // Sovremennye problemy ugolovnoj politiki. — Krasnodar, 2011. — T. 2. — S. 113—119.
11. Tel’nov P. F. Otvetstvennost’ za souchastie v prestuplenii. — M., 1974. — 208 s.
12. Ugolovnoe pravo Rossii. Osobennaya chast’ / pod red. I. E. Zvecharovskogo. — M., 2010. — 640 s.
13. Ugolovnoe pravo Rossii. Osobennaya chast’ / pod red. O. S. Kapinus. — M., 2015. — T. 2. — 941 s.
14. Shargorodskij M. D. Vina i nakazanie v sovetskom ugolovnom prave. — M., 1945. — 56 s.
Review
For citations:
Rarog A.I. Legislator’s error: types, reasons, ways of correction. Actual Problems of Russian Law. 2019;(4):95-103. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17803/1994-1471.2019.101.4.095-103
Views:
2048
Email this article 