Legal regulation of initiation stage of criminal proceedings: foreign experience
https://doi.org/10.17803/1994-1471.2019.101.4.104-110
Abstract
The paper describes the main trends in the development of the criminal case in the Russian criminal procedure. The author analyzed changes in the criminal procedure legislation of Ukraine, the Republic of Kazakhstan regarding refusal to initiate a criminal case as a stage of criminal proceedings. The author makes a conclusion about the significance of the stage of initiation of a criminal case in the Russian criminal procedure. It also does not exclude the need to improve criminal procedural legislation in terms of regulating the stage in question by legislatively defining the rights of participants to verify a crime report, defining a list of investigative actions, the results of which could be used for evidence at the preliminary investigation stage, beyond duplication of actions already taken and so on.
Keywords
stage of initiation of a criminal case,
Criminal Procedural Code of the Russian Federation,
Criminal Procedure Code of Ukraine,
Criminal Procedure Code of the Republic of Kazakhstan,
Unified Register of Pre-Trial Investigations,
foreign experience in reforming the stage of initiating a criminal case
About the Author
V. N. Rostova
Prosecutor’s Office of the Chelyabinsk Region
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Prosecutor of the Department for Supervision of the Procedural Activity of the Directorate of the Ministry of the Interior of Russia, Main Directorate of the Ministry of the Interior of Russia in the Chelyabinsk Region, 1st Class Lawyer,
454091, Chelyabinsk, ul. Elkina, d. 11
References
1. Derishev Yu. V., Naumov K. A. Predusmatrivaet li UPK otmenu rukovoditelem sledstvennogo organa postanovleniya o vozbuzhdenii ugolovnogo dela? // Zakonnost’. — 2016. — № 7. — S. 53—57.
2. Zyablina M. V. K voprosu ob isklyuchenii iz rossijskogo ugolovnogo processa stadii vozbuzhdeniya ugolovnogo dela // Rossijskaya yusticiya. — 2017. — № 7. — S. 66—69.
3. Karetnikov A. S., Koretnikov S. A. Sledstvennye dejstviya kak sposoby proverki soobshcheniya o prestuplenii // Zakonnost’. — 2014. — № 7. — S. 37—42.
4. Karipova A. T., Kasymova A. S., Mukanov D. Zh. O vliyanii uchetno-registracionnoj sistemy na pokazateli prestupnosti v novyh pravovyh usloviyah (na primere kvartal’nogo analiza prestupnosti) // Vserossijskij kriminologicheskij zhurnal. — 2016. — T. 10. — № 4. — C. 701—709.
5. Kurs ugolovnogo processa / pod red. L. V. Golovko. — M., 2017. — 1280 s.
6. Mahmutov M. Zakon o doznanii v sokrashchennoj forme i reforma stadii vozbuzhdeniya ugolovnogo dela // Zakonnost’. — 2013. — № 7. — S. 39—43.
7. Novyj UPK glazami praktikov: pervye itogi primeneniya // URL: http://jurliga.ligazakon.ua/news/2013/9/12/97602.htm (data obrashcheniya: 22.09.2017).
8. Halikov A. Sobiranie dokazatel’stv v hode proverki soobshcheniya o prestuplenii // Zakonnost’. — 2013. — № 12. — S. 54—57.
9. Shalumov M. S. Ispol’zovanie materialov, sobrannyh do vozbuzhdeniya ugolovnogo dela, v kachestve dokazatel’stv // Ugolovnyj process. — 2005. — № 3. — S. 28—32.
Review
For citations:
Rostova V.N. Legal regulation of initiation stage of criminal proceedings: foreign experience. Actual Problems of Russian Law. 2019;(4):104-110. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17803/1994-1471.2019.101.4.104-110
Views:
971
Email this article 