Nature of legal status of the subjects of forensic activities
https://doi.org/10.17803/1994-1471.2019.101.4.111-117
Abstract
The paper discusses the main problems of the enforcement mechanism in the appointment and production of forensic examination. It is shown that the provisions of the current criminal procedural legislation inadequately carry out the legal regulation of the subjects of forensic activities. Particular attention is given to ensuring the rights and legitimate interests of those participating in the expert study of individuals. Analyzing the rules governing the procedure for the appointment of forensic examinations, the author draws attention to the absence of temporary restrictions on familiarizing the participants in the criminal process with the resolution on the appointment of the examination. The author justifies the possibility of vesting the defense with the right to assign expertise, which could be implemented through non-state forensic institutions or private experts. Proposals for the improvement of legislation and law enforcement practice are formulated. The theoretical conclusions formulated in the paper serve as a basis for further research of forensic issues, and can also contribute to the improvement of rule-making in this area.
About the Author
L. V. Lazareva
Vladimir Law Institute of the Federal Enforcement Service of Russia;
Vladimir State University named after Alexander and Nikolay Stoletovs
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Doctor of Law, Professor, Professor of the Department of Criminal Procedure and Forensic Science;
Professor of the Department of Criminal Law Disciplines,
600020, Vladimir, ul. B. Nizhegorodskaya, d. 67e
References
1. Baev O. Ya. Taktika ugolovnogo presledovaniya i professional’noj zashchity ot nego. Sledstvennaya taktika : nauchno-prakticheskoe posobie. — M. : Ekzamen, 2003. — 432 c.
2. Kommentarij k zakonodatel’stvu o sudebnoj ekspertize: ugolovnoe, grazhdanskoe, arbitrazhnoe sudoproizvodstvo / Yu. G. Koruhov [i dr.] ; otv. red. V. F. Orlova. — M. : Norma, 2004. — 191 s.
3. Lazareva L. V. Konceptual’nye osnovy ispol’zovaniya special’nyh znanij v rossijskom ugolovnom sudoproizvodstve : dis. ... d-ra yurid. nauk. — Vladimir, 2011. — 470 s.
4. Lazareva L. V. Proizvodstvo sudebnoj ekspertizy na stadii vozbuzhdeniya ugolovnogo dela: problemy regulirovaniya i realizacii // Sudebnaya ekspertiza. — 2015. — № 3. — S. 10—22.
5. Rossinskaya E. R. Kommentarij k Federal’nomu zakonu «O gosudarstvennoj sudebno-ekspertnoj deyatel’nosti v Rossijskoj Federacii». — M. : Pravo i zakon : Yurajt-Izdat, 2002. — 384 s.
6. Rossinskaya E. R. Sudebnaya ekspertiza v grazhdanskom, arbitrazhnom, administrativnom i ugolovnom processe. — M. : Norma, 2005. — 656 s.
7. Sudebnaya ekspertiza kak sredstvo dokazyvaniya v ugolovnom sudoproizvodstve : nauchnoe izdanie. — M. : IPK RFCSE, 2005. — 264 c.
8. Sudebnye ekspertizy / S. A. Aksenov, E. G. Dmitriev, S. M. Zosimov, V. V. Kolkutin [i dr.]. — 2-e izd., dop. — M. : Yurlitinform, 2006. — 288 c.
9. Fojnickij I. Ya. Kurs ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva. — SPb., 1996. — T. 2.
10. Shejfer S. A. Sledstvennye dejstviya. — 2-e izd. — M. : Yurlitinform, 2001. — 208 s.
11. Shlyahov A. R. Sudebnaya ekspertiza: organizaciya i provedenie. — M. : Yurid. lit., 1979. — 167 s.
12. Ekspert : rukovodstvo dlya ekspertov organov vnutrennih del / pod red. T. V. Aver’yanovoj i V. F. Statkusa. — M. : KnoRus : Pravo i zakon, 2003. — 591 s.
Review
For citations:
Lazareva L.V. Nature of legal status of the subjects of forensic activities. Actual Problems of Russian Law. 2019;(4):111-117. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17803/1994-1471.2019.101.4.111-117
Views:
1836
Email this article 