Preview

Actual Problems of Russian Law

Advanced search

The Specifics of the Legal Regime of the Civil Legal Relations Objects Functioning (Theoretical Aspect)

https://doi.org/10.17803/1994-1471.2020.112.3.136-144

Abstract

The paper analyzes the current state of development of the concept of the legal regime and its features in the legal literature. It is indicated that the key phrase “regulatory procedure” is not fully consistent with the definition of the legal regime. Wider approaches to understanding the phenomenon of the concept of “legal regime” in the form of a functional characteristic of the operation of law are proposed. It is noted that to describe the features of the legal regime, researchers often and haphazardly use individual qualitative characteristics that do not fully reveal the meaning of the definitions of both the legal regime and its individual attributes. The author clarifies the difference between the characteristics of “special” and “particular”, “specialized” and “specific” in relation to civil legal relations. The conclusion is drawn on the need for legislative consolidation of the revealed differences and the establishment of two types of legal regimes — the legal regime of activity and the legal regime of the operation of an object. Based on the conducted structural study, the author formulates the definitions for the legal regime and civil law regime.

About the Author

D. S. Tereshchenko
B.B. Gorodovikov Kalmyk State University
Russian Federation

Dmitry S. Tereshchenko, Lieutenant Colonel of Tax Police, Adviser of the Tax and Customs Services of the 3rd Rank (Lugansk, Ukraine), Master of Law, Postgraduate Student of the Department of Civil Law and Procedure of the B.B. Gorodovikov Kalmyk State University (Elista, Republic of Kalmykia)

ul. A.S. Pushkina, d. 11, Elista, Republic of Kalmykia, Russia, 358000



References

1. Alekseev S. S. Obshchie dozvoleniya i obshchie zaprety v sovetskom prave / pod red. L. A. Plekhanova. — M. : Yurid. lit., 1989. — 288 c.

2. Alekseev S. S. Teoriya prava. — Izd. 2-e, dop., pererab. — M. : Bek, 1995. — 320 s.

3. Anisimov A. P. Aktual’nye problemy pravovogo rezhima zemel’ naselennyh punktov v Rossijskoj Federacii : monografiya. — M. : Yurlitinform, 2010. — 456 s.

4. Barzilova I. S. Ponyatie i yuridicheskaya priroda pravovyh rezhimov // Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta MVD Rossii. — 2017. — № 3. — S. 10—14.

5. Belyaeva G. S. Pravovoj rezhim: obshcheteoreticheskoe issledovanie : dis. ... d-ra yurid. nauk. — Kursk, 2013. — 407 s.

6. Bratanovskij S. I., Bratanovskaya M. S. K konceptual’nomu ponyatiyu «pravovogo rezhima» v pravovoj sisteme Rossijskoj Federacii // Sovremennoe obshchestvo i vlast’. — 2016. — № 2 (8). — S. 61—65.

7. Vishnyakova O. V. Slovar’ paronimov russkogo yazyka. — M. : Rus. yaz., 1984. — 191 s.

8. Efremova T. F. Novyj slovar’ russkogo yazyka. Tolkovo-slovoobrazovatel’nyj. — M. : Rus. yaz., 2000. — T. 2 : P — Ya. — 1088 s.

9. Mal’ko A. V., Rodionov O. S. Pravovye rezhimy v rossijskom zakonodatel’stve // Zhurnal rossijskogo prava. — 2001. — № 9. — S. 19—26.

10. Mal’ko A. V., Salomatin A. Yu. Teoriya gosudarstva i prava : uchebnoe posobie / predisl. akad. RAN A. G. Lisicina-Svetlanova. — 2-e izd. — M. : RIOR: Infra-M, 2014. — 213 s.

11. Matuzov N. I., Mal’ko A. V. Pravovye rezhimy: voprosy teorii i praktiki // Pravovedenie. — 1996. — № 1. — S. 16—29.

12. Morozova L. A. Konstitucionnoe regulirovanie v SSSR. — M. : Yurid. lit., 1985. — 144 s.


Review

For citations:


Tereshchenko D.S. The Specifics of the Legal Regime of the Civil Legal Relations Objects Functioning (Theoretical Aspect). Actual Problems of Russian Law. 2020;15(3):136-144. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17803/1994-1471.2020.112.3.136-144

Views: 656


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1994-1471 (Print)
ISSN 2782-1862 (Online)