Application of Mediation Procedures in the CIS Countries: Comparative Legal Analysis
https://doi.org/10.17803/1994-1471.2020.113.4.176-186
Abstract
The paper is devoted to the consideration of mediation procedures regulation by the norms of the legislation of the CIS countries, the application of which depends on the will of the parties and entails a change in the general procedure for criminal proceedings. Their undoubted practical advantages are noted. Based on the comparative legal analysis, the norms of the legislation of all the CIS countries are examined, which regulate mediation procedures in criminal proceedings. Some features, advantages and disadvantages of such regulation are revealed. The author makes a conclusion on the importance given to mediation procedures, which have become an integral part of the legal system of the CIS countries, as well as on the similarity of many basic provisions regarding their regulation. It is noted that the legislation of all CIS countries contains mediation procedures based on the reconciliation of the parties and the active repentance of the person who committed the crime (with the exception of the Kyrgyzstan legislation). At the same time, similar conditions are provided for a decision on the release of a person from criminal liability, namely: the category of crime clearly defined by law, the consent of the suspect (accused) and compensation for the harm caused by the crime. It is noted that Kazakhstan, Belarus, and Kyrgyzstan have gained experience in successfully using mediation as a way to resolve conflicts in pre-trial order. According to the authors, such experience is appropriate and necessary to study and use in the process of improving domestic legislation.
About the Authors
S. V. Kornakova
Baikal State University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Cand. Sci. (Law), Department of Legal Support for National Security
ul. Lenina, d. 11, Irkutsk, Russia, 664003
E. V. Mishchenko
Orenburg State University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Dr. Sci. (Law), Associate Professor, Dean of the Faculty of Law
prosp. Pobedy, d. 13, Orenburg, Russia, 460018
V. V. Mishin
Zaozerskiy Garrison Military Court
Chairman
ul. Flotskaya, d. 2, Zaozersk, Murmansk region, Russia, 184310
References
1. Abshilava G. V. Soglasitelnye procedury v ugolovnom sudoproizvodstve Rossijskoj Federacii: avtoref. dis. ... d-ra yurid. nauk. — M., 2012. — 56 s.
2. Bekkaria Ch. O prestupleniyax i nakazaniyax. — M. : Stels BIMPL, 1995. — 304 s.
3. Dudina N. A. Sootnoshenie proizvodstva pri zaklyuchenii dosudebnogo soglasheniya o sotrudnichestve s soglasitelnymi procedurami v ugolovno-processualnom zakonodatelstve zarubezhnyx stran // Vestnik Sibirskogo yuridicheskogo instituta FSKN Rossii. — 2016. — № 2 (23). — S. 86—91.
4. Zajceva L. L. Alternativnoe razreshenie ugolovno-pravovyx konfliktov v zakonodatelstve Respubliki Belarus // Aktualnye problemy yuridicheskogo obrazovaniya v kontekste obucheniya alternativnomu uregulirovaniyu sporov kak podxodu k obespecheniyu prav cheloveka : materialy Mezhdunar. nauch.-metod. konferencii, Minsk, 29 noyabrya — 3 dekabrya 2016 g. — Minsk : ICz BGU, 2016. — S. 199—207.
5. Kuvaldina Yu. V. Sdelka o priznanii viny: opyt ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva SShA // Aktualnye problemy sovremennogo ugolovnogo processa Rossii : sbornik nauch. statej. — Samara : Samarskij universitet, 2005. — S. 198—214.
6. Kulbaev A. K. Ugolovno-processualnyj kodeks Kyrgyzskoj Respubliki 2017 goda: novelly. — Bishkek, 2018. — 183 s.
7. Kuri X., Ilchenko O. Yu. Effektivnost nakazaniya: rezultaty mezhdunarodnyx issledovanij // Aktualnye problemy ekonomiki i prava. — 2013. — № 2 (26). — S. 240—256.
8. Mixajlov P. Sdelki o priznanii viny — ne v interesax poterpevshix // Rossijskaya yusticiya. — 2001. — № 5. — S. 37—38.
9. Orlov Yu. K. Problemy teorii dokazatelstv v ugolovnom processe. — M. : Yurist, 2009. — 175 s.
10. Petruxin I. Sdelki o priznanii viny chuzhdy rossijskomu mentalitetu // Rossijskaya yusticiya. — 2001. — № 5. — S. 35—37.
11. Rodin V. V., Yadzhin N. V. Dosudebnoe soglashenie i «sdelka s pravosudiem»: pragmatizm bez konflikta s nravstvennostyu? // Yuridicheskaya nauka i pravooxranitelnaya praktika. — 2014. — № 4 (30). — S. 180—189.
12. Smolkova I. V. Znachenie priznaniya obvinyaemym svoej viny pri prekrashhenii ugolovnogo presledovaniya v svyazi s deyatelnym raskayaniem (st. 28 UPK RF) // Biblioteka kriminalista. — 2017. — № 3 (38). — S. 200—206.
13. Smolkova I. V. Priznanie obvinyaemym svoej viny: dokazatelstvennoe i pravovoe znachenie. — M.: Yurlitinform, 2017. — 432 s.
14. Smolkova I. V. Trebuetsya li priznanie obvinyaemym svoej viny pri osobom poryadke prinyatiya sudebnogo resheniya (glava 40 UPK RF) // Sibirskie ugolovno-processualnye i kriminalisticheskie chteniya. — 2018. — № 3 (32). — S. 112—119.
15. Smolkova I. V. Trebuetsya li priznanie obvinyaemym svoej viny pri prekrashhenii ugolovnogo dela v svyazi s primireniem storon (st. 25 UPK RF) // Biblioteka kriminalista. — 2018. — № 3 (38). — S. 200—206.
16. Tejman S. Sdelki o priznanii viny ili sokrashhennye formy sudoproizvodstva: po kakomu puti pojdet Rossiya? // Rossijskaya yusticiya. — 1998. — № 10. — S. 35—37.
17. Filatova U. B., Arxipkina A. S., Nekrasov S. Yu., Arxipkin I. V. Mediaciya v ugolovnom processe: analiz pravovogo regulirovaniya v Federativnoj Respublike Germaniya // Vserossijskij kriminologicheskij zhurnal. — 2017. — T. 11. — № 4. — S. 824—832.
Review
For citations:
Kornakova S.V., Mishchenko E.V., Mishin V.V. Application of Mediation Procedures in the CIS Countries: Comparative Legal Analysis. Actual Problems of Russian Law. 2020;15(4):176-186. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17803/1994-1471.2020.113.4.176-186
Views:
550
Email this article 