A Factual Ground of a Cause of Action: A Concept and Elements
https://doi.org/10.17803/1994-1471.2020.113.4.074-082
Abstract
The factual basis of the claim consists of facts substantiating the plaintiff’s cause of action. The cause of action may include various facts of legal significance. These facts are classified into legal (right-initiating), rightobtrusive, right-changing and right-terminating. Some authors, as an independent type of facts that may be included in the cause of action, highlight the facts of violation or challenge of the right or legitimate interest. The paper substantiates the attribution of these facts to the right-creating ones. The paper subjects to criticism the views that claim that legal facts and the ability of the plaintiff to substantiate the cause of action by any facts including those of only informative significance are wrong. The author also expresses a negative attitude to the widespread division of the grounds of the cause of action into active and passive. Right-infringing factors included into the passive cause of action — often referred to as facts causing the action — are in fact right-generating factors. Thus, they must be referred to as the active cause of action. Distinguishing the facts of active and passive legitimation from the other facts superfluously and artificially complicates the structure of the cause of action. In procedural theory, it was suggested that the cause of action was not necessarily based on what the plaintiff had pointed out.
In this case, however, it is permissible to mix the concepts of “cause of action” and “cause of satisfaction”, and, therefore, this view cannot be considered correct. Thus, the doctrine on the actual basis of the cause of action contains a significant number of shortcomings that need to be eliminated.
In this case, however, it is permissible to mix the concepts of “cause of action” and “cause of satisfaction”, and, therefore, this view cannot be considered correct. Thus, the doctrine on the actual basis of the cause of action contains a significant number of shortcomings that need to be eliminated.
About the Author
V. N. Ivakin
Kutafin Moscow State Law University (MSAL)
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Cand. Sci. (Law), Associate Professor, Department of Civil and Administrative Procedure
ul. Sadovaya-Kudrinskaya, d. 9, Moscow, Russia, 125993
References
1. Avdeenko N. I. Isk // Sovetskij grazhdanskij process / pod red. N. A. Chechinoj i D. M. Chechota. — L. : Izd-vo LGU, 1984. — S. 108—128.
2. Vikut M. A. Isk kak element prava na sudebnuyu zashhitu, ego yuridicheskaya priroda i obosnovanie // Voprosy teorii i praktiki grazhdanskogo processa : mezhvuz. nauch. sbornik. — Vyp. I. — Saratov, 1976. — S. 47—62.
3. Gurvich M. A. Uchenie ob iske (sostav, vidy) : uchebnoe posobie. — M. : VYuZI, 1981. — 40 s.
4. Dobrovolskij A. A. Elementy iska kak ego sostavnye chasti // Dobrovolskij A. A., Ivanova S. A. Osnovnye problemy iskovoj formy zashhity prava. — M. : Izd-vo MGU, 1979. — S. 32—54.
5. Zejder N. B. Elementy iska v sovetskom grazhdanskom processe // Uch. zap. Saratov yurid. in-ta. — Vyp. IV. — Saratov, 1956. — S. 132—168.
6. Isaenkova O. V. Isk v grazhdanskom sudoproizvodstve : uchebnoe posobie / pod red. M. A. Vikut. — Saratov: SGAP, 1997. — 96 s.
7. Isaenkova O. V. Isk i iskovoe proizvodstvo // Grazhdanskoe processualnoe pravo Rossii : uchebnik dlya vuzov / S. F. Afanasev [i dr.] ; pod red. S. F. Afanaseva. — M. : Yurajt, 2013. — S. 321—341.
8. Krashenninikov E. A. Zametki po grazhdanskomu sudoproizvodstvu // Kategorialnyj apparat sovremennoj yuridicheskoj nauki : tezisy dokladov i soobshhenij itogovoj nauchno-prakticheskoj konferencii molodyx uchenyx «XXVI sezd KPSS i nekotorye aktualnye problemy sovremennogo nauchnogo znaniya». — Yaroslavl, 1984. — S. 13—19.
9. Maslennikova N. I. Isk // Grazhdanskij process : uchebnik dlya vuzov / otv. red. Yu. K. Osipov — M.: Bek, 1995. — S. 194—225.
10. Mixajlov S. M., Pyatiletov I. M. Isk // Grazhdanskij process : uchebnik dlya bakalavrov / otv. red. V. V. Blazheev, E. E. Uksusova. — M. : Prospekt, 2015. — S. 208—240.
11. Osokina G. L. Isk (teoriya i praktika). — M. : Gorodecz, 2000. — 192 s.
12. Osokina G. L. Problemy iska i prava na isk. — Tomsk : Izd-vo Tomsk. un-ta, 1989. — 196 s.
13. Pushkar E. G. Iskovoe proizvodstvo v sovetskom grazhdanskom processe (Processualnye posledstviya vozbuzhdeniya del). — Lvov : Vishha shkola, 1978. — 199 s.
14. Pushkar E. G. Pravo na obrashhenie v sud za sudebnoj zashhitoj : avtoref. dis. ... d-ra yurid. nauk. — Kiev, 1984. — 36 s.
15. Pyatiletov I. M. Isk // Grazhdanskoe processualnoe pravo Rossii : uchebnik dlya vuzov / pod red. M. S. Shakaryan. — M. : Bylina, 1996. — S. 118—144.
16. Semyonov V. M. Isk // Sovetskij grazhdanskij process / pod red. K. I. Komissarova i V. M. Semyonova. — 2-e izd., pererab. i dop. — M. : Yuridicheskaya literatura, 1988. — S. 228—251.
17. Fedina A. S. Isk // Grazhdanskij process : uchebnik / pod red. L. V. Tumanovoj. — M. : Prospekt, 2019. — S. 183—188.
18. Ferens-Soroczkij A. A. Isk // Grazhdanskij process / pod red. V. A. Musina, N. A. Chechinoj, D. M. Chechota. — Izd. 3, pererab. i dop. — M. : PBOYuL Grizhenko E. M., 2001. — S. 188—209.
19. Shheglov V. N. Isk i ego elementy // Problemy sovershenstvovaniya grazhdansko-pravovogo regulirovaniya — Tomsk, 1982. — S. 112—122.
20. Shheglov V. N. Isk o sudebnoj zashhite grazhdanskogo prava : lekcii dlya studentov. — Tomsk : Izd-vo Tomsk. un-ta, 1987. — 168 s.
21. Yudelson K. S. Sovetskij grazhdanskij process. — M. : Gosyurizdat, 1956. — 439 s.
22. Yarkov V. V. Isk // Grazhdanskij process : uchebnik dlya studentov vysshix yuridicheskix uchebnyx zavedenij / Uralskij gos. yurid. un-t ; otv. red. d-r yurid. nauk, prof. V. V. Yarkov. — 10-e izd., pererab. i dop. — M. : Statut, 2017. — S. 254—293.
Review
For citations:
Ivakin V.N. A Factual Ground of a Cause of Action: A Concept and Elements. Actual Problems of Russian Law. 2020;15(4):74-82. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17803/1994-1471.2020.113.4.074-082
Views:
3211
Email this article 