Moral Philosophy as a Methodological Basis and Value of Professional Ethics in Law
https://doi.org/10.17803/1994-1471.2020.113.4.020-031
Abstract
On the basis of the finding of an obvious lack of morality in professional fields, where the threat is posed to the person himself and, consequently, to the society as a whole, the author justifies that it is moral philosophy that is destined to serve as a methodological basis and a value guide for the professional ethics in law at the center of which there is a person as a person rather than any external object as a formal value.The paper demonstrates the approach according to which training of modern lawyers assumes strengthening of morality in law by the forces of professional philosophers, primarily representing ethics, who are able to give knowledge about the origin and essence of morality, about the history of ethical teachings, about the content of categories and values; to carry out rather deep moral and philosophical examination of various ancillary problems, bearing in mind their intrinsic interconnection. All these make it possible to understand that a kind of a core in the professional activity of a lawyer is represented by the motivation to perform the necessary work important for the common cause necessary for preservation and improvement of the society towards the social ideal. Thus, the philosophical and legal club “Moral Dimension of Law” that has successfully operated under the auspices of the Department of Philosophy and Sociology for 18 years relies in its work on the concepts mentioned above. The combination of educational and research activities has serious educational significance, which in a certain sense, is redeeming for modern education as a whole.
Keywords
morality,
philosophy,
professional ethics,
man,
methodology,
ethical categories and values,
training of modern lawyers,
applied problems,
social ideal,
philosophical and legal club “Moral dimension of law”,
education,
moral and philosophical expertise,
society,
activity of the lawyer,
education
Supporting agencies: The reported study was funded by RFBR according to the research project No. 18-29-14002.
About the Author
V. M. Artemov
Kutafin Moscow State Law University (MSAL)
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Dr. Sci. (Law), Professor, Department of Philosophy and Sociology, Academic Director of “Moral Dimension of Law” Club
ul. Sadovaya-Kudrinskaya, d. 9, Moscow, Russia, 125993
References
1. Bauman Z., Donskis L. Tekuchee zlo: zhizn v mire, gde net alternativ. — SPb., 2019. — 296 s.
2. Vygorbina A. E. Etika socialnyx otnoshenij. Opyt filosofsko-sociologicheskogo issledovaniya nravstvennyx aspektov prava i socialnoj zhizni. — M., 2011. — 372 s.
3. Kant I. Osnovopolozhenie k metafizike nravov // Sochineniya = Werke : na nemeczkom i russkom yazykax : v 4 t. — M., 1997. — T. 3. — 784 s.
4. Koni A. F. Vospominaniya o pisatelyax : literaturnye ocherki. — SPb., 2010. — 352 s.
5. Losev A. F. Derzanie duxa. — M., 1988. — 366 s.
6. Nauchno-texnologicheskie transformacii v sovremennom obshhestve: nravstvenno-filosofskoe osmyslenie i osobennosti pravovogo regulirovaniya : sbornik nauchnyx trudov / otv. red. V. M. Artemov, O. Yu. Rybakov. — M. : Prospekt, 2019. — 408 s.
7. Sinyukov V. N. Sistemnyj poisk novoj paradigmy razvitiya prava kak socialnogo regulyatora i ego alternativy // Nravstvennost i pravo: realnost i perspektivy vzaimodejstviya : sbornik nauchnyx trudov / otv. red. V. M. Artemov, O. Yu. Rybakov — M. : Prospekt, 2019. — S. 11—13.
8. Uilson E. O. Biofiliya : Vrozhdennaya tyaga k zhivomu kak svyaz cheloveka s drugimi biologicheskimi vidami. — M., 2017. — 304 s.
9. Xyusman R., Xetfild D. Faktor spravedlivosti, ili «I eto posle togo, chto ya dlya tebya sdelal...». — M. : Znanie, 1992. — 96 s.
10. Czvyk V. A. Professionalnaya etika: osnovy obshhej teorii : ucheb. posobie. — Izd. 2-e. — M., 2012. — 288 s.
11. Yaspers K. Niczshe i xristianstvo. — M., 1994. — 114 s.
12.
Review
For citations:
Artemov V.M. Moral Philosophy as a Methodological Basis and Value of Professional Ethics in Law. Actual Problems of Russian Law. 2020;15(4):20-31. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17803/1994-1471.2020.113.4.020-031
Views:
566
Email this article 