Preview

Actual Problems of Russian Law

Advanced search

Some Aspects of Interpretation and Application of Articles 35, 39, 45 of the Family Code of the Russian Federation in Court Proceedings

https://doi.org/10.17803/1994-1471.2020.113.4.063-073

Abstract

The paper analyzes the issues of court interpretation and application of certain provisions of Art. 35, 39, 45 of the Family Code of the Russian Federation. The author describes the norms devoted to the regulation of property relations in the family and responsibility of spouses for obligations. The paper also provides for the details of differnt types of obligations. The paper analyzes the concept of debt and the necessity of its inclusion in the family legislation. Particular attention is paid to the interpretation of the rules aimed at regulating the procedure for the implementation of transactions where the common property of spouses is involved, the procedure for the recovery of debts of spouses. Common features on the implementation of transactions with the common property of spouses and on transactions that can lead to the emergence of common debt obligations are elucidated. The paper carries out examination of the jurisprudence of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation with regard to the issues under consideration. The author focuses on practical problems in the field of application of these norms of law, as well as contradictions in approaches of the law-maker and courts to the regulation of homogeneous property relations in family law. The author gives suggestions on improvement of legislation.

About the Author

A. A. Dobrovinsky
"Alexander Dobrovinsky & Partners"
Russian Federation

Cand. Sci. (Law), Advocate at Moscow Bar Association, 

per. Posledniy, d. 7, Moscow, Russia, 107045



References

1. Antokolskaya M. V. Semejnoe pravo. — M. : Yurist, 2002.

2. Glinka V. I. K voprosu o ravnyx pravax suprugov na priobretennoe v brake imushhestvo // Nauchnyj podxod k obshhestvennomu razvitiyu. — 2016.

3. Grave K. A. Imushhestvennye otnoshenij suprugov. — M., 1960.

4. Vinichenko Yu. V. Ponyatie «oborot» v chastnom prave Rossii i Ukrainy // Uchenye zapiski Tavricheskogo nacionalnogo universiteta imeni V. I. Vernadskogo. Seriya : Yuridicheskie nauki. — 2013. — T. 26 (65). — № 2—2. — S. 90—97.

5. Eroxina E. V., Najdenova I. A. Semejnoe pravo. — Orenburg : OGU, 2014.

6. Ershova N. M. Imushhestvennye pravootnosheniya v seme. — M., 1979.

7. Ilina O. Yu. Problemy interesa v semejnom prave RF. — M. : Gorodecz, 2007. — 192 s.

8. Kanakov L. A. Obshhaya sobstvennost suprugov // Notarius. — 2008. — № 1. — S. 37—38.

9. Nechaeva A. M. Semejnoe pravo : kurs lekcij. — M., 2001

10. Ryasencev V. A. Sovetskoe semejnoe pravo. — M., 1982.

11. Tarxov V. A. Imushhestvennye otnosheniya suprugov. — Saratov, 1969.

12. Shershenevich G. F. Kurs grazhdanskogo prava. — Tula : Avtograf, 2001.

13. Ezrox Yu. S. Potrebitelskoe kreditovanie v Rossii i SSSR // Dengi i kredit. — 2013. — № 12. — S. 60—65.


Review

For citations:


Dobrovinsky A.A. Some Aspects of Interpretation and Application of Articles 35, 39, 45 of the Family Code of the Russian Federation in Court Proceedings. Actual Problems of Russian Law. 2020;15(4):63-73. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17803/1994-1471.2020.113.4.063-073

Views: 590


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1994-1471 (Print)
ISSN 2782-1862 (Online)