Preview

Actual Problems of Russian Law

Advanced search

Application of Artificial Intelligence Technologies in the Creation of Vaccines and other Intellectual Property Objects (Legal Aspects)

https://doi.org/10.17803/1994-1471.2020.116.7.076-090

Abstract

The paper is devoted to the issues associated with the use of artificial intelligence (AI) technologies in intellectual property objects, in particular vaccines, in the context of fight against a pandemic. It is emphasized that AI technologies allow us to overcome similar problems at the national and international levels and to prevent their recurrence in the future. The author highlights that the most important requirements for observance of constitutional rights and freedoms of citizens consolidated in regulatory acts and impossibility of their restriction in AI technologies must be supplemented with clear rules regulating the legal framework of artificial intelligence, including intellectual activity, and responsibility of developers and AI users. At the same time, the AI legal personality also needs to be thoroughly elaborated with the focus on providing a reasonable balance of rights, responsibilities and eligibility among developers, AI users, and other addressees entering into legal relationships involving artificial intelligence. A key aspect in the context of the legal regulation of the results of intellectual activity created entirely or partially by artificial intelligence is represented by the balance between the interests of rights holders and the public interests. Possible restrictions of rights of copyright holders as established in international instruments (Para 31 of the 1994 Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights) should be accepted as a harmonizing basis and adopted in national legal systems. At the same time, rights holders must be provided with appropriate guarantees of respect for their rights (In particular, the non-exclusive nature of the use of intellectual rights in the context of such restrictions, payment of reasonable remuneration, etc.).

About the Author

B. A. Shakhnazarov
Kutafin Moscow State Law University (MSAL)
Russian Federation

Beniamin A. Shakhnazarov, Cand. Sci. (Law), Associate Professor, Department of Private International Law,

ul. Sadovaya-Kudrinskaya, d. 9, Moscow, 125993



References

1. Kalincheva M. V. O nekotoryh voprosah pravovoj ohrany izobretenij, sozdannyh iskusstvennym intellektom //URL: https://zakon.ru/blog/2020/2/25/o_nekotoryh_voprosah_pravovoj_ohrany_izobretenij_sozdannyh_iskusstvennym_intellektom (data obrashcheniya: 12.05.2020).

2. Kibal’nik A. G., Volosyuk P. V. Iskusstvennyj intellekt: voprosy ugolovno-pravovoj doktriny, ozhidayushchie otvetov // Yuridicheskaya nauka i praktika : Vestnik Nizhegorodskoj akademii MVD Rossii. — 2018. — № 4 (44).

3. Laptev V. A. Ponyatie iskusstvennogo intellekta i yuridicheskaya otvetstvennost’ za ego rabotu // Pravo. Zhurnal Vysshej shkoly ekonomiki. — 2019. — № 2.

4. Morhat P. M. Iskusstvennyj intellekt: pravovoj vzglyad. — M. : Buki Vedi, 2017.

5. Morhat P. M. K voprosu o specifike pravovogo regulirovaniya iskusstvennogo intellekta i o nekotoryh pravovyh problemah ego primeneniya v otdel’nyh sferah // Zakon i pravo. — 2018. — № 6.

6. Ponkin I. V., Red’kina A. I. Iskusstvennyj intellekt s tochki zreniya prava // Vestnik Rossijskogo universiteta druzhby narodov. Seriya : Yuridicheskie nauki. — 2018. — T. 22. — № 1.

7. Ebbot R. Proekt «Iskusstvennyj izobretatel’» // Zhurnal VOIS. — 2019. — № 6. — URL: https://www.wipo.int/wipo_magazine/ru/2019/06/article_0002.html (data obrashcheniya: 12.05.2020).

8. Eccleston-Turner M. The Economic Theory of Patent Protection and Pandemic Influenza Vaccines: Do Patents Really Incentivize Innovation in the Field? // American Journal of Law & Medicine. — Vol. 2. — Is. 2—3. — Pp. 572—597.

9. Etzioni O., DeCario N. AI Can Help Scientists Find a Covid-19 Vaccine // URL: https://www.wired.com/story/opinion-ai-can-help-find-scientists-find-a-covid-19-vaccine/ (data obrashcheniya: 02.05.2020).

10. Guihot M., Matthew A., Suzor N. Nudging robots: Innovative solutions to regulate artificial intelligence // Vanderbilt Journal of Entertainment and Technology Law. — 2017. — 20(2). — Pp. 385—456. — URL: https://eprints.qut.edu.au/109926/ (data obrashcheniya: 02.05.2020).

11. Habli I., Lawtonb T., Porterc Z. Artificial intelligence in health care: accountability and safety // Bulletin of the World Health Organization. — 2020. — № 98. — Pp. 251—252. — URL: https://www.who.int/bulletin/volumes/98/4/19-237487.pdf?ua=1 (data obrashcheniya: 02.05.2020).

12. Hallevy G. When Robots Kill: Artificial Intelligence under Criminal Law. — University Press of New England, 2013.

13. LeCun Y., Bengio Y., Hinton G. Deep learning // Nature. — 2015. — May 28. — № 521 (7553). — Pp. 436—444.


Review

For citations:


Shakhnazarov B.A. Application of Artificial Intelligence Technologies in the Creation of Vaccines and other Intellectual Property Objects (Legal Aspects). Actual Problems of Russian Law. 2020;15(7):76-90. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17803/1994-1471.2020.116.7.076-090

Views: 847


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1994-1471 (Print)
ISSN 2782-1862 (Online)