Forensic Investigation of Origin of Lies
https://doi.org/10.17803/10.17803/19941471.2021.124.3.133-142
Abstract
The genesis of the origin of lies in the paper is considered in two aspects: from the point of view of its socio-psychological nature (the reasons for the emergence of lies as a phenomenon of interpersonal communication in general) and from the point of view of its appearance in a criminal case (the reasons for the lies of participants in criminal proceedings). Through the prism of the historical development of a person as a biological species (phylogeny) and as a separate representative of this species (ontogeny), a lie is a person’s communication skill acquired in the process of socialization and demanded by society, a system of interactions of psychophysiological components of his body, functioning according to a certain, spontaneously formed in the process individual development patterns. The consequence of the individuality of a lie is the absence of its universal feature. The analysis of the motivating reasons for the lies of the participants in criminal proceedings was carried out on a comprehensive basis. The paper describes specific factors that determine the appearance of lies in a criminal investigation, such as the situation of interaction; peculiarities of relationships and communication between subjects of communication; the personality and activity of the person at whom the lie is directed; the personality of the subject of lies, his motivation, individual psychological, moral and other features, his assessment of the situation of interaction, etc. In a structured form, possible motives for the lies of participants in criminal proceedings are given.
About the Author
K. V. Podvoyskiy
Lomonosov Moscow State University; Moscow Lawyer’s Office Infralex
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Korney V. Podvoyskiy - Postgraduate student, Department of Criminalistics, Faculty of Law, Lomonosov MSU, Advocate for the Criminal Law and Procedure Practice, Moscow Lawyer’s Office Infralex
Leninskie Gory, d. 1, str. 13 (4th academic building), Moscow, 119991
References
1. Dospulov G. G. Psihologiya doprosa na predvaritel’nom sledstvii. — M., 1976. — 112 s.
2. Engalychev V. F., Kravcova G. K., Holopova E. N. Sudebnaya psihologicheskaya ekspertiza po vyyavleniyu priznakov dostovernosti/nedostovernosti informacii, soobshchaemoj uchastnikami ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva (po videozapisyam sledstvennyh dejstvij i operativno-razysknyh meropriyatij) : monografiya. — M., 2016. — 328 s.
3. Znakov V. V. Psihologiya ponimaniya pravdy. — SPb., 1999. — 281 s.
4. Isajchev E. S., Isajchev S. A., Nasonov A. V., Chernorizov A. M. Diagnostika skryvaemoj informacii na osnove analiza kognitivnyh vyzvannyh potencialov mozga cheloveka // Nacional’nyj psihologicheskij zhurnal. — 2011. — № 15. — S. 70–77.
5. Kertes I. Taktika i psihologicheskie osnovy doprosa. — M., 1965. — 165 s.
6. Krasnikov M. A. Regulyativnaya funkciya dezinformacii v processe mezhlichnostnogo obshcheniya : dis. ... kand. psih. nauk. — M., 2006. — 208 s.
7. Lipmann O. Psihologiya lzhi // Lozh’ v prave. — Har’kov, 1929. — 48 s.
8. Luriya A. R. Eksperimental’naya psihologiya v sudebno-sledstvennom dele // Sovetskoe pravo. — 1927. — № 1 (26). — S. 84–100.
9. Lyubimova N. G. Rekonstrukciya «implicitnyh teorij» lichnosti o lzhi i obmane : dis. ... kand. psih. nauk. — Habarovsk, 2003. — 199 s.
10. Maklakov A. G. Obshchaya psihologiya. — SPb., 2001. — 592 s.
11. Nikitina E. V. Vzaimosvyaz’ obraza situacii lzhi s povedeniem lichnosti (na primere predstavitelej socionomicheskogo tipa professij) : dis. ... kand. psih. nauk. — Kazan’, 2009. — 163 s.
12. Podvojskij K. V. Kriminalisticheskaya klassifikaciya lzhi // Zakonodatel’stvo. — 2019. — № 7. — S. 56–62.
13. Polstovalov O. V. Processual’nye, nravstvennye i psihologicheskie problemy kriminalisticheskoj taktiki na sovremennom etape : dis. ... d-ra yurid. nauk. — Ufa, 2009. — 642 s.
14. Porubov A. N. Lozh’ i bor’ba s nej na predvaritel’nom sledstvii / pod red. I. I. Baseckogo. — Minsk, 2002. — 176 s.
15. Psihofiziologiya : uchebnik / pod red. Yu. I. Aleksandrova. — SPb., 2014. — 496 s.
16. Ratinov A. R., Adamov Yu. P. Lzhesvidetel’stvo (proiskhozhdenie, predotvrashchenie i razoblachenie lozhnyh pokazanij). — M., 1976. — 135 s.
17. Ratinov A. R., Gavrilova N. I. Logiko-psihologicheskaya struktura lzhi i oshibki v svidetel’skih pokazaniyah // Voprosy bor’by s prestupnost’yu. — 1982. — № 37. — S. 44–57.
18. Ratinov A. R. Sudebnaya psihologiya dlya sledovatelej. — M., 2001. — 352 s.
19. Rubenshtejn S. L. Osnovy obshchej psihologii. — SPb., 2002. — 720 s.
20. Simonenko S. I. Psihologicheskie osnovaniya ocenki lozhnyh i pravdivyh soobshchenij : dis. ... kand. psih. nauk. — M., 1998. — 114 s.
21. Smirichinskaya V. V. Pedagogicheskie usloviya korrekcii detskoj lzhi : dis. ... kand. ped. nauk. — M., 1993. — 168 s.
22. Tarasov A. N. Sovremennye formy korporativnogo moshennichestva: prakticheskoe posobie. — M., 2015. — 320 s.
23. Ushakov O. M. Teoreticheskie i prakticheskie problemy taktiki doprosa lica, sklonnogo k dache lozhnyh pokazanij : dis. ... kand. yurid. nauk. — Vladivostok, 2004. — 189 s.
24. Fraj O. Lozh’. Tri sposoba vyyavleniya. Kak chitat’ mysli lzheca. Kak obmanut’ detektor lzhi. — SPb., 2006. — 284 s.
25. Centrov E. E. O suti sledstvennogo dejstviya «proverka pokazanij na meste» // Zakonnost’. — 2013. — № 10. — S. 50–55.
26. Vrij A. Detecting lies and deceit: pitfalls and opportunities. — Second edition. — West Sussex (England), 2008. — 488 p.
Supplementary files
Review
For citations:
Podvoyskiy K.V. Forensic Investigation of Origin of Lies. Actual Problems of Russian Law. 2021;16(3):133-142. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17803/10.17803/19941471.2021.124.3.133-142
Views:
576
Email this article 