The Formation of the Legal Status of Applied Genomic Research through the Formation of Self-Regulatory Professional Associations
https://doi.org/10.17803/1994-1471.2020.119.10.132-140
Abstract
The paper considers the most discussed areas of individual genomic data application. The authors note an increase in the volume of research on the individual genome decoding and the use of genomic data in the field of assisted reproductive technologies. The development of ethical principles, the development of national ethical requirements, and the formation of an ethical code are being discussed in the Russian Federation. The question is raised about the mechanisms for introducing the principles of self-regulation. A possible key to solving this issue is the creation of self-regulatory professional associations, as well as the improvement of the legislative framework of the Russian Federation in this area.
Keywords
individual genomic data,
self-regulation,
self-regulatory professional associations,
associations,
genetic testing,
testing
Supporting agencies: The reported study was funded by RFBR according to the research project № 18-29-14078
About the Authors
K. V. Mashkova
Kutafin Moscow State Law University (MSAL)
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Ksenia V. Mashkova - Cand. Sci. (Law), Associate Professor of the Department of Sports Law.
Ul. Sadovaya-Kudrinskaya, d. 9, Moscow, 125993
A. Yu. Shirokov
Academy of Postgraduate Education of the Federal Clinical Research Centre of Russia's Federal Medical-Biological Agency
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Aleksey Yu. Shirokov - Cand. Sci. (Medicine), Associate Professor, Professor of the Department of Hygiene, Epidemiology and Infectious Diseases.
Volokolamskoe sh., d. 91, Moscow, 125371
References
1. Bezrukova O. V., Romanovskaya O. V. Pravotvorcheskaya politika v oblasti biomediciny v Rossijskoj Federacii // Vektor nauki Tol'yattinskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. — 2014. — № 3. — S. 28—31.
2. Borisov D. A., Lazarev S. V., Misyulin S. S. Samoreguliruemye organizacii v zdravoohranenii // URL: https://www.remedium.ru/health/detail.php?ID=36183 (data obrashcheniya: 01.06.2020).
3. Ivanov V. I., Izhevskaya V. L. Etika genomiki. Eticheskie principy genomnyh issledovanij // Chelovek. — 1999. — № 4-5. — URL: http://vivovoco.ibmh.msk.su/VV/PAPERS/MEN/GEN_ETHICS.HTM (data obrashcheniya: 01.06.2020).
4. Labutin M. A. «Pravo na neznanie» v kontekste razvitiya sovremennyh medicinskih i geneticheskih tekhnologij // Pravo i sovremennye tekhnologii v medicine / otv. red. A. A. Mohov, O. V. Sushkova. — M. : Prospekt, 2019. — S. 53—56.
5. Medvedev M. V., Suvorov G. N., Osavelyuk A. M., Zenin S. S. Pravovye ogranicheniya pri provedenii procedury prenatal'nogo geneticheskogo skrininga v Rossii i zarubezhnyh stranah // Zdravoohranenie Rossijskoj Federacii. — 2019. — T. 63. — № 5. — S. 264—270.
6. Nedyuk M. Etika v genetike: uchenye razrabatyvayut kodeks genomnyh issledovanij. Dokument budet regulirovat' vse vazhnye voprosy, svyazannye s DNK-manipulyaciyami // Izvestiya. — 04.01.2019.
7. Nikiforov V. V., Suvorova E. I., Istomin N. P., Zenin S. S., Suvorov G. N. Problemy zakonodatel'nogo regulirovaniya ispol'zovaniya geneticheskoj informacii v sfere lichnogo strahovaniya v Rossii // Zakon i pravo. — 2019. — № 10. — S. 26—32.
8. Samoreguliruemye organizacii v medicine. Kto est' kto // URL: http://www.privatmed.ru/article/36/1247/2041/ (data obrashcheniya: 01.06.2020).
9. Troickij A. V., Suranova T. G., Suvorov G. N., Zenin S. S., Suvorova E. I. Analiz mezhdunarodnyh pravil hraneniya, dostupa i zashchity dannyh polnogenomnogo sekvenirovaniya // Problemy prava. — 2019. — № 3 (72). — S. 55—63.
10. Carson C., Hinton L., Kurinczuk J., Quigley M. 'I haven't met them, I don't have any trust in them. It just feels like a big unknown': A qualitative study exploring the determinants of consent to use Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority registry data in research // BMJ Open. — 2019. 9 (5), e026469.
11. Dekeuwer C. «Ostrich-like approach or rational idiot? About the wisest attitude towards predictive medicine» [«Faire l'autruche ou l'idiot rationnel? De l'attitude la plus sage a adopter face aux predictions proposees par la medecine genomique»] // Ethique et Sante. — 2018. — 15 (4). — Pp. 238—243.
12. DoD News Briefing Secretary of Defense William S. Cohen // URL: https://web.archive.org/web/20041118074748/http://www.defense.gov/transcripts/1997/t042897_t0428coh.html (data obrashcheniya: 01.06.2020).
13. Ioannidis J. P. A. (2005) Why Most Published Research Findings Are False // PLoS Med 2(8): e124. — URL: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.0020124 (data obrashcheniya: 01.06.2020).
14. Kaiser J. Biobanks. Population databases boom, from Iceland to the U. S. // Science. — 2002;298:1158—6.
15. Munnich A. Personalized genomic medicine: For the better or for the worse? [La medecine genomique personnalisee: predire ou medire?] // Bulletin de l'Academie Nationale de Medecine. — 2019. — 203 (6). — Pp. 409—412.
16. Sodeke S. O., Powell L. R. Paying Tribute to Henrietta Lacks at Tuskegee University and at the Virginia Henrietta Lacks Commission, Richmond, Virginia // Journal of Health Care for the Poor and Underserved. — 2019. — 30 (4). — Pp. 1—11.
17. Wouden C. H. van der, Cambon-Thomsen A., Cecchin E., Cheung K. C., Davila-Fajardo C. L., Deneer V. H., et al. Implementing pharmacogenomics in Europe: design and implementation strategy of the Ubiquitous Pharmacogenomics Consortium // Clin Pharmacol Ther. — 2017. — 101. — Pp. 341—358.
Review
For citations:
Mashkova K.V., Shirokov A.Yu. The Formation of the Legal Status of Applied Genomic Research through the Formation of Self-Regulatory Professional Associations. Actual Problems of Russian Law. 2020;15(10):132-140. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17803/1994-1471.2020.119.10.132-140
Views:
492
Email this article 