Preview

Actual Problems of Russian Law

Advanced search

The Termination of Treaties: To the Origins of the Formation

https://doi.org/10.17803/1994-1471.2021.123.2.153-164

Abstract

Over a long historical period of development, the institution of the termination of treaties has reached a high degree of maturity. Many of the norms that form it, having arisen in the treaty practice of states in antiquity, not only reflected the needs of their era, but gradually, passing from generation to generation, have transformed. Some of them have become part of the modern system of international law, having been enshrined in the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties (1969). Since ancient times, treaties have been terminated as a result of armed conflicts between states. The punishments for non-compliance with obligations envisaged by ancient treaties, as well as the religious oath designed to serve as a guarantee of their observance, were an expression of the idea of the inviolability of treaties. At the same time, the possibility of their termination was provided for as a result of violation of the fixed conditions. The main reason for the termination of treaties of the feudal period, as in antiquity, was wars. At the end of the 18th — beginning of the 19th century the agreements began to include provisions regulating their revision and even the ability to declare a complete rejection of them, notifying the counterparties. This practice testifies to the emergence of one of the currently widespread methods of terminating treaties, i.e. denunciation. Consideration of the practice of terminating treaties of the Soviet state is carried out taking into account the impact of the 1917 Revolution on the further progressive development of the law of treaties.

About the Author

О. I. Ilinskaya
Kutafin Moscow State Law University (MSAL)
Russian Federation

Olga I. Ilinskaya, Cand. Sci. (Law), Associate Professor, Department of International Law

ul. Sadovaya-Kudrinskaya, d. 9, Moscow, 125993



References

1. Baskin Yu. Ya., Fel’dman D. I. Istoriya mezhdunarodnogo prava. — M. : Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya, 1990. — 204 s.

2. Bibikov P. Ocherk mezhdunarodnogo prava v Grecii. — M. : tip. V. Got’e, 1852. — 118 s.

3. Vattel’ E. Pravo narodov ili principy estestvennogo prava, primenyaemye k povedeniyu i delam nacij i suverenov. — M. : Gosyurizdat, 1960. — 719 s.

4. Klyuchnikov Yu. V., Sabanin A. Mezhdunarodnaya politika Novejshego vremeni v dogovorah, notah i deklaraciyah. — Ch. 1–3. — M., 1925.

5. Kozhevnikov F. I. Russkoe gosudarstvo i mezhdunarodnoe pravo do HH v. — M. : Yur. izd-vo, 1947. — 336 s.

6. Korovin E. A. Francuzskaya burzhuaznaya revolyuciya XVIII v. i mezhdunarodnoe pravo. Francuzskaya burzhuaznaya revolyuciya 1789–1794 gg. — M. : Socekgiz, 1941. — 104 s.

7. Krylov S. B. Mezhdunarodnyj Sud OON. — M. : Gosyurizdat, 1958. — 167 s.

8. Makiavelli N. Sochineniya. T. I. — M., L. : Academia, 1934. — 507 s.

9. Mihajlovskij G. I. Yuridicheskaya obyazatel’nost’ mezhdunarodnyh dogovorov // Izvestiya MID. — 1913. — Kn. 5.

10. Oppengejm L. Mezhdunarodnoe pravo : per. s angl. — M. : Gos. izd. inostr. lit., 1949. — T. 1, p/t. 2. — 408 s.

11. Talalaev A. N. Pravo mezhdunarodnyh dogovorov (istoriko-pravovoj ocherk) // Sovetskij ezhegodnik mezhdunarodnogo prava. 1972. — M., 1973.

12. Talalaev A. N. Pravo mezhdunarodnyh dogovorov. Obshchie voprosy. — M. : Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya, 1980. — 312 s.

13. Tunkin G. I. Teoriya mezhdunarodnogo prava. — M. : Zercalo, 2000. — 416 s.

14. Tunkin G. I. Teoriya mezhdunarodnogo prava. — M. : Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya, 1970. — 506 s.

15. Shurshalov V. M. Osnovaniya dejstvitel’nosti mezhdunarodnyh dogovorov. — M. : Izd-vo AN SSSR, 1957. — 232 s.

16. Yuzefovich T. Dogovory Rossii s Vostokom, politicheskie i torgovye. — SPb., 1869. — 296 s.

17. De Clercq M. Recueil des traites. — Paris, 1884. — T. I.

18. Frankowska M. Wypowiedzenie umowy miedzynarodowej. — Warszawa, 1976.

19. Nussbaum A. A Concise History of the Law of Nations. — N. Y., 1947.

20. Phillipson C. The International Law and Custom of Ancient Greece and Rome. — Vol. I. — London, 1911.

21. Przybylowski K. Klausula «rebus sic stantibus» w rozwoju historycznym // Pamietnik Historyczno-Prawny. — Lwow, 1927. — T. III.

22. Schwarzenberger G. A Manual of International Law. — London, 1947.

23. Stadtmuller G. Geschichte des Völkerrechts. — Hannover, 1951. — T. I.

24. Taube, bar. M. de. Linviolabilite des traites // Recueil des cours de l’Academie de droit international de La Haye. — 1930. — T. XXXII. — № 11.


Review

For citations:


Ilinskaya О.I. The Termination of Treaties: To the Origins of the Formation. Actual Problems of Russian Law. 2021;16(2):153-164. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17803/1994-1471.2021.123.2.153-164

Views: 1119


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1994-1471 (Print)
ISSN 2782-1862 (Online)