Cryptocurrency as a Digital Representation of Value: The Singapore Experience

In 2019, in order to create attractive conditions for the development of the Fintech sector in Singapore, the Payment Services Law was adopted, which consolidated the definition of cryptocurrency (digital payment tokens) and the procedure for its circulation. In addition, this Law established the criteria for distinguishing payment tokens from other virtual objects — securities tokens, utility tokens, game currencies. In the paper, the authors analyze the concept of digital payment tokens as a digital representation of value, consider the rules for transactions with them. It is concluded that the use of this approach makes it possible to minimize difficulties in regulating the turnover of, for example, bitcoins. Based on the Singapore experience, recommendations for the modernization of domestic legislation are proposed. The main difficulty seems to be that the use of the digital value representation mode in relation to cryptocurrency is associated with the need to either establish an extraterritorial regime of regulation in relation to cryptocurrency exchanges, or adopt an international agreement in this area.

tokens, digitalization, cryptocurrency, securities, investments, Singapore, foreign experience, digital payment instruments, bitcoin, cryptocurrency exchange, payment services

1. Belyh V. S., Bolobonova M. O. Kriptovalyutnye derivativy: problemy pravovogo regulirovaniya // Yurist. - 2019. - № 5. - S. 35-44.

2. Belyh V. S., Egorova M. A., Reshetnikova S. B. Bitkoin: ponyatie i tendencii pravovogo regulirovaniya // Yurist. - 2019. - № 3. - S. 4-11.

3. Belyh V. S., Stepanchenko A. V. K voprosu o ponyatii inostrannoj valyuty kak ob"ekta grazhdanskih prav // Grazhdanskoe pravo. - 2017. - № 5. - S. 3-6.

4. Egorova M. A., Efimova L. G. Ponyatie i osobennosti pravovogo regulirovaniya kriptovalyut // Predprinimatel’skoe pravo. - 2019. - № 3. - S. 11-16.

5. Efimova L. G. Nekotorye aspekty pravovoj prirody kriptovalyut // Yurist. - 2019. - № 3. - S. 12-19.

6. Arner D. W., Buckley R. P., Didenko A., et al. Distributed Ledger Technology and Digital Assets - Policy and Regulatory Challenges in Asia // Asian Development Bank Economics Research Report; UNSW Law Research Paper. - 2019. - № 19-60 ; University of Hong Kong Faculty of Law Research Paper № 2019/040. - URL: https://ssrn.com/abstract=341440816.

7. Blandin A., Cloots A. S., Hussain H., et al. Global Cryptoasset Regulatory Landscape Study // University of Cambridge Faculty of Law Research Paper № 23/2019. - URL: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3379219.

8. Chuen K., Lee D. Decentralization and Distributed Innovation: Fintech, bitcoin and ICO’s // Bitcoin and ICO’s. 2017. URL: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/322675411_Decentralization_and_Distributed_Innovation_FinTech_Bitcoin_and_ICO's_Stanford_Asia-Pacific_Innovation_Conference.

9. Koh J. Crypto Conundrum Part I: Navigating Singapore’s Regulatory Regime // Singapore Academy of Law Practitioner. - 2020. - Vol. 3. - URL: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3564935.

10. Koh J. Crypto Conundrum Part II: A Multi-Jurisdictional Uncertainty // Singapore Academy of Law Practitioner. - 2020. - Vol. 4. - URL: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3564972.

11. Lin Lin. Regulating FinTech: The Case of Singapore // Banking and Finance Law Abstract. Forthcoming; NUS Law Working Paper № 2019/028; NUS Centre for Banking & Finance Law Working Paper 19/04. - URL: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3481563.