The Evolution of Liability Measures Applied in Bankruptcy to Creditors’ Property Rights Violators in Russia

One of the tasks the modern law in the field of insolvency of legal entities pursues is to ensure the maximum balance of the rules governing the measures of liability applied to managers, participants and other entities controlling the debtor. In this regard, the author applies historical and comparative method of studying the measures of responsibility applied during the development of domestic legal regulation of insolvency and the critical assessment method that forms the basis for the analysis of the current Russian legislation. The paper carries out a retrospective analysis of the form and degree of fault as an element of the offense that traditionally acted as one of the criteria for choosing the type of insolvency, as well as for imposing the measures of responsibility. A comparative analysis of the norms of the Russian bankrupt legislation in historical retrospect allowed raising problematic issues of the current legislation and making proposals aimed at their resolution. Currently, the rules of the current domestic insolvency legislation provide an equal amount of responsibility for both bad faith (intentional) and unreasonable (careless) actions of entities controlling the debtor. The normative consolidation of measures of responsibility dependent on the form of fault, namely, the separate qualification of intentional and careless offenses, will secure coherent application of the principle of justice. Modern Russian law contains the concepts of “insolvency” and “bankruptcy”, which in some cases creates legal uncertainty. Therefore, it is proposed to delineate these concepts by law, eliminate the term “objective bankruptcy” from the application, and shift its semantic burden to the concept of “insolvency”. Thereby, a separate category of insolvency will be included in the current legislation.

1. Belyavskij L.A., Rubinovskij A.L. Ulozheniye o nakazanijah ugolovnykh i ispravitelnykh v tolkovanii juristov. – SPb., 1902. – 408 s.

2. Vasilev I.I. Pskovskaja Sudnaja gramota (1397-1467) : Podlinnaja i v perevode na sovremennyj jazyk s primechanijami po ustanovleniju perevodnogo teksta / Sost. I.I.Vasilev i N.V.Kirpichnikov. – Pskov : Tipografija Gubernskogo Pravlenija, 1896. – 76 s.

3. Karamzin N.M. Istorija gosudarstva Rossijskogo. – SPb. : Medicinskaja tipografija, 1816. – 526 s.

4. Martysevich I.D. Pskovskaja sudnaja gramota: Istoriko-juridich. issledovanie [tekst i perevod]. – M. : Izd-vo MGU, 1951. – 208 s.

5. Sviridenko O.M. Institut nesostojatel’nosti (bankrotstva) v sisteme grazhdanskogo prava (V ezhegodnye nauchnye chtenija, posvjashhenye pamjati professor S.N. Bratusja) // Zhurnal Rossijskogo prava. – 2011. - № 1. – S. 39-46.

6. Titov U.P. Khrestomatija po istorii gosudarstva i prava Rossii. – M. : Prospekt, 2005. – 463 s.

7. Tikhomirov M.N., Epifanov P.P. Sobornoe ulozhenie 1649 goda. – M. : Izd-vo Mosk. Un-ta, 1961. – 444 s.

8. Tomsinov V.A. Sudebniki 1497 i 1550 godov kak pamjatniki jurispridencii Moskovskogo gosudarstva // problemy istorii gosudarstva i prava. Sbornik nauchnykh trudov; pod red.V.A.Tomsinova. M. : Zercalo-M, 2009. – 287 s.

9. Ustrjalov F.N. Issledovanie Pskovskoj Sudnoj Gramoty 1497 goda. – SPb.: Tipografija Appolona Fridrikhsona, 1855. – 192 s.

10. Fjodorov A.F. Veksel’noe parvo. S prilozheniem vysochajshe utverzhdjonnogo, 27 maja 1902 goda, Ustava o vekseljakh. – Odessa, 1906. – 721 s.

11. Fjodorov A.F. Istorija vekselja: Istoriko-juridicheskoe issledovanie. – Odessa: Tipografija Shtaba Odesskogo voennogo okruga, 1895. – 107 s.

12. Jushkov S.V. Russkaja Pravda: proiskhozhdenie, istochniki, ejo znachenie : nauch.-prakt. posobie. – M. : Zercalo-M, 2002. – 378 s.